Comparison of AQUAVAN® Injection to DISOPRIVAN® Injectable Emulsion for Anesthesia During Coronary Artery Surgery
Phase 2, Randomized Study of AQUAVAN® Injection In Elective Coronary Artery Surgery With Comparison to DISOPRIVAN® Injectable Emulsion
1 other identifier
interventional
16
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This is an exploratory clinical trial designed to examine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of fospropofol (AQUAVAN) Injection compared to propofol (DISOPRIVAN) Injectable Emulsion when used to preoperatively sedate, induce, and maintain general anesthesia and to postoperatively sedate patients undergoing elective coronary artery surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Jun 2002
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2002
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2003
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 21, 2005
CompletedJune 11, 2010
June 1, 2010
1.1 years
September 13, 2005
June 10, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Median time (minutes) to loss of consciousness from induction start (reported as median and range).
Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Median time (minutes) to induction from start of infusion (reported as median and range).
Day 1
Time (minutes) to intubation from induction start (reported as median and range).
Day 1
Time (minutes) to extubation from end of infusion (reported as median and range).
Day 1
Time (minutes) to last suture from induction start (reported as median and range).
Day 1
Time (minutes) to full awareness from end of infusion (reported as median and range).
Day 1
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
fospropofol
EXPERIMENTALpropofol
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Using a Target Controlled Infusion (TCI) system, the target plasma concentrations of propofol to be administered from AQUAVAN were 0.7 μg/mL (sedation) and 2.5 μg/mL (maintain anesthesia).
Using a Target Controlled Infusion (TCI) system, the target plasma concentrations of propofol to be administered from Disoprivan were 1.0 μg/mL (sedation) and 3.0 μg/mL (maintain anesthesia).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients were between the ages of 21 and 70 years, inclusive.
- Patients were scheduled for first-time elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery, with 1 to 4 grafts planned.
- Patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Classification System status of II or III.
- Patients had a "good" left ventricular function as defined by a cardiac ejection fraction \>=50% measured by cardiac catheterization or other quantitative technique.
- Patients provided written Informed Consent after receiving a full explanation of the extent and nature of the study and were willing to comply with the study procedures.
- Patients, if female, were surgically sterile or postmenopausal.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient had prior coronary bypass grafting or other cardiac surgery.
- Patient had uncontrolled hypertension (diastolic \>110 mm Hg) or required additional intervention while hospitalized prior to surgery to control blood pressure.
- Patient had a medical history of renal disease or creatinine \>1.4 mg/dL.
- Patient had known hemodynamically significant valvular abnormalities, except Grade 1 tricuspid or mitral insufficiency.
- Patient had severe obesity, defined as a body mass index (BMI) \>35.
- Patient failed the Allen's Test to confirm the patency of the ulnar artery.
- Patient had severe or uncontrolled systemic illness (e.g., pulmonary disease, cancer, endocrine abnormalities).
- Patient had insulin-dependent diabetes.
- Patient had a history of stroke or current neurological disease (e.g., dementia, neuropathy), as determined by the Investigator.
- Patient had anticipated difficulties with intubation, in the judgment of the Investigator.
- Patient had a history of alcohol abuse, as determined by the Investigator;
- Patient had participated in an investigational drug study within 1 month prior to study start.
- Patient had donated \>300 mL of blood within 1 month prior to study start.
- Patient had a positive medical history for drug abuse.
- Patient had a known infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B, and/or Hepatitis C.
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Eisai Inc.lead
- PPD Development, LPcollaborator
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
James Vornov, PhD,MD
Eisai Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2005
First Posted
September 21, 2005
Study Start
June 1, 2002
Primary Completion
July 1, 2003
Study Completion
July 1, 2003
Last Updated
June 11, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-06