NCT00187213

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that biventricular pacing (BiV) and left univentricular (left ventricular \[LV\] only) pacing are safe and effective for cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) device. The hypothesis to be tested by this clinical investigation is that patients indicated for an ICD with cardiac resynchronization therapy respond as well to LV only pacing as to BiV pacing.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2004

Typical duration for not_applicable heart-failure

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2004

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 13, 2005

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 16, 2005

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2007

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2008

Completed
Last Updated

February 4, 2019

Status Verified

February 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

September 13, 2005

Last Update Submit

February 1, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Ventricular Dyssynchrony

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The primary objective is to demonstrate that left univentricular pacing is equivalent to biventricular pacing in improving the functional capacity and inducing reverse remodeling.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • The secondary objective of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the proportion of improved patients in each group, using the Heart Failure Clinical Composite Response.

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Have an approved indication for implantation of an ICD for treatment of a life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmia(s)
  • Have advanced heart failure with a New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification of III or IV, despite receiving a minimum of 30 days of stable optimal pharmacological therapy
  • Have a ventricular conduction delay manifested as a QRS width \>= 130 ms
  • Have a left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) \>= 55 mm
  • Have a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<= 35%

You may not qualify if:

  • Have a CRT device already implanted
  • Have a standard indication for bradycardia pacing
  • Have a history of chronic atrial fibrillation \[AF\] (continuous AF lasting \> 1 month) within 1 year prior to enrollment or have undergone cardioversion for AF in the past month)
  • Have the ability to walk \> 450 meters during the 6-minute walk test
  • Have uncorrected primary valvular disease
  • Have had a recent myocardial infarction, unstable angina or cardiac revascularization (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty \[PTCA\] or coronary artery bypass graft \[CABG\]) within 1 month of enrollment
  • Have had cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 3 months of enrollment
  • Have a life expectancy of less than one year
  • Are unable to comply with the follow-up schedule and tests
  • Are minors (age below 18 years)
  • Are pregnant or are planning for pregnancy in the next 6 months

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Cardiology - CHU Pontchaillou

Rennes, 35011, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Boriani G, Kranig W, Donal E, Calo L, Casella M, Delarche N, Lozano IF, Ansalone G, Biffi M, Boulogne E, Leclercq C; B-LEFT HF study group. A randomized double-blind comparison of biventricular versus left ventricular stimulation for cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Biventricular versus Left Univentricular Pacing with ICD Back-up in Heart Failure Patients (B-LEFT HF) trial. Am Heart J. 2010 Jun;159(6):1052-1058.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.03.008.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Heart FailureVentricular DysfunctionHeart Diseases

Interventions

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cardiac Pacing, ArtificialElectric Stimulation TherapyTherapeutics

Study Officials

  • Christophe Leclercq, MD, PhD

    CHU Pontchaillou Rennes France

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2005

First Posted

September 16, 2005

Study Start

December 1, 2004

Primary Completion

July 1, 2007

Study Completion

January 1, 2008

Last Updated

February 4, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-02

Locations