NCT00170105

Brief Summary

Study Objective:

  • To examine the perceptions of time spent at the bedside; perceptions of bedside manner; and patient perceptions of the provider-patient interaction offered by emergency providers when they sit versus when they stand during the initial evaluation. This project is clinically relevant research different from prior Emergency Department (ED) satisfaction studies since this study will contribute information about factors that could increase patient satisfaction with his/her provider in the ED setting. This research may guide specific guidelines for quality improvement efforts. The investigators hypothesize that patients will perceive that the emergency providers are at the bedside longer, demonstrate better bedside manner, and have better provider-patient interactions when they sit versus when they stand. Additionally, the investigators hypothesize that providers who sit will perceive that they are at the bedside longer than those who stand for the same period of time. Methods: A convenience sample of adult patients will complete a 5-item questionnaire concerning the perceived time spent with the emergency provider and the qualities of the provider-patient interaction. Emergency providers will be randomly assigned to either sit or stand during the initial evaluation. The providers will complete a 4-item questionnaire. These data will be compared to the actual time spent in the evaluation, measured in seconds, using a stopwatch. These data, combined with demographic data obtained from the patient chart, will be analyzed to examine whether there are statistically significant differences in patient perceptions and satisfaction.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
244

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2005

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2005

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 13, 2005

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 15, 2005

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2006

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2006

Completed
Last Updated

February 2, 2010

Status Verified

February 1, 2010

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

September 13, 2005

Last Update Submit

February 1, 2010

Conditions

Keywords

Age 18 years or olderNo cognitive impairment or altered mental statusStableNo aphasiaEnglish-speaking

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

•- The subject population represents a convenience sample of patients 18 years and older who give consent. * All English speaking individuals with adequate health status and cognitive function to communicate answers to the investigator. * There are no foreseen reasons to exclude pregnant women as they are not likely to be vulnerable in this study.

You may qualify if:

  • The subject population represents a convenience sample of patients 18 years and older who give consent.
  • All English speaking individuals with adequate health status and cognitive function to communicate answers to the investigator.
  • There are no foreseen reasons to exclude pregnant women as they are not likely to be vulnerable in this study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Unstable patients and patients seen in the critical care area will be excluded from study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

Location

Study Officials

  • Annie T. Sadosty, M.D.

    Mayo Clinic

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2005

First Posted

September 15, 2005

Study Start

August 1, 2005

Primary Completion

August 1, 2006

Study Completion

August 1, 2006

Last Updated

February 2, 2010

Record last verified: 2010-02

Locations