A Randomised Trial of Rapid Diagnostic Tests in the Diagnosis of Malaria in Tanzania
1 other identifier
interventional
2,400
1 country
1
Brief Summary
There is clear evidence diagnosis of malaria in much of Africa is sub-optimal and this has a negative impact on patient care. Many of those treated for malaria do not have it. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are dipsticks which diagnose malaria rapidly and accurately. The main objective of this trial is to determine by means of a randomised trial the impact of introducing RDTs into a standard outpatient setting in Tanzania has on the appropriate prescription of antimalarials. Other objectives are:
- 1.To compare at high, moderate and low P.falciparum transmission intensity the sensitivity and specificity of malaria diagnosis using hospital slide results and RDTs, using research quality slides as the reference.
- 2.To estimate the specificity of clinical diagnosis of malaria at high, moderate and low transmission intensity of P. falciparum.
- 3.To compare the proportion of cases reported as slide-negative who are treated for malaria with the proportion of RDT-negative cases treated for malaria.
- 4.To evaluate the cost effectiveness of introducing RDTs compared to current diagnostic practice in facilities with microscopic diagnosis of malaria at different levels of transmission of P.falciparum.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jan 2005
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 5, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 7, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2005
CompletedJanuary 12, 2017
January 1, 2017
September 5, 2005
January 11, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcomes (5)
The proportion of slide negative cases given an antimalarial (overprescription of antimalarials) in the RDT arm compared to the standard care arm.
The proportion of slide positives not given an antimalarial who are slide positive (underprescription of antimalarials).
Proportion of cases who are treated for malaria on clinical grounds alone
Sensitivity and specificity of RDT and hospital malaria slide compared to double read research slide results.
The proportion of patients receiving additional or alternative treatments to antimalarials following a negative blood slide or RDT result. This will inform cost-effectiveness models
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients of any age attending the outpatient facility will be eligible to be considered for the trial
- A clinician decision to request a malaria test.
You may not qualify if:
- Where a clinician decides that they would prefer a hospital slide to the patient entering the trial- these cases will be noted but excluded from the trial.
- Patients are admitted from outpatients to the ward Those who appear to the study clinical officer to be too distressed or ill to participate.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kilimanjaro Christian Medical College
Moshi, Moshi, Private Bag, Tanzania
Related Publications (2)
Reyburn H, Mbatia R, Drakeley C, Carneiro I, Mwakasungula E, Mwerinde O, Saganda K, Shao J, Kitua A, Olomi R, Greenwood BM, Whitty CJ. Overdiagnosis of malaria in patients with severe febrile illness in Tanzania: a prospective study. BMJ. 2004 Nov 20;329(7476):1212. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38251.658229.55. Epub 2004 Nov 12.
PMID: 15542534BACKGROUNDReyburn H, Mbakilwa H, Mwangi R, Mwerinde O, Olomi R, Drakeley C, Whitty CJ. Rapid diagnostic tests compared with malaria microscopy for guiding outpatient treatment of febrile illness in Tanzania: randomised trial. BMJ. 2007 Feb 24;334(7590):403. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39073.496829.AE. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
PMID: 17259188RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christopher Whitty, FRCP
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 5, 2005
First Posted
September 7, 2005
Study Start
January 1, 2005
Study Completion
November 1, 2005
Last Updated
January 12, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01