Comprehension and Evaluation of a Pictorial Action Plan for Those With Asthma or COPD
1 other identifier
interventional
69
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Some five million people in the United Kingdom (U.K.) have asthma. The British Guidelines on Asthma recommend self management education and the issuing of written personal asthma action plans. The use of such self management education has been shown to be associated with an up to 40% reduction in hospitalisation rates and a 20% reduction in Emergency Department attendances and similar benefits in terms of symptoms and time off work. In asthma, the results are best when the patients are provided with a personalised written action plan explaining how to alter their medications according to a variety of circumstances. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a major cause of hospitalisation in the U.K. and is the fourth biggest single cause of death. A recent Cochrane review regarding the value of self management education in COPD has led to equivocal results although it has shown that those with COPD are willing to take control of their own conditions. The reasons for the different outcomes in asthma and COPD may reflect an inadequate number of trials of the wrong type; interventions that were not appropriate or do not work; lack of the use of written action plans; or assessment of benefit using the wrong outcomes. Given the importance attached to the written action plan, it is essential that such advice is available to all. However, studies of outpatients attending hospitals in the U.K. have shown that 15% may be functionally illiterate and in studies of adults with asthma in the United States (U.S.), 13% have similarly shown to be functionally illiterate. Pictorial advice may therefore be advantageous and, when tested amongst those who are literate, it has been also shown to enhance the recall of spoken medical instructions. The investigators have therefore prepared some pictorial representations which are designed to give advice to those with asthma and COPD about how to recognise the worsening of their conditions and what treatments to alter or initiate as a result. The investigators now need to assess the comprehensibility of those materials amongst a selection of patients with asthma and COPD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable asthma
Started Jan 2005
Longer than P75 for not_applicable asthma
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 11, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 12, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2010
CompletedOctober 7, 2019
October 1, 2019
5 years
August 11, 2005
October 3, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Recall and understanding after pictorial self management education
information recall after education
Baseline only
Translucency and guessability scores comprehensibility
This outcome measure provides score for each image used in the plan
Baseline
Study Arms (1)
Intervention arm
EXPERIMENTALPictorial action plan
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Understanding of spoken English language
- Evidence of respiratory disease (either asthma or COPD)
You may not qualify if:
- Poor level of English language; English not first language
- Poor eyesight or literacy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
NHLI Imperial College
London, W6 8RF, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Roberts NJ, Evans G, Blenkhorn P, Partridge MR. Development of an electronic pictorial asthma action plan and its use in primary care. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul;80(1):141-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.040. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
PMID: 19879092RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Martyn R Partridge, MD FRCP
Imperial College London
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 11, 2005
First Posted
August 12, 2005
Study Start
January 1, 2005
Primary Completion
January 1, 2010
Study Completion
January 1, 2010
Last Updated
October 7, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share