A Study of Bonviva (Ibandronate) Once Monthly in Post-Menopausal Women With Osteopenia
Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Ibandronate Once Monthly in Postmenopausal Women With Osteopenia
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
12
Brief Summary
This 2 arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral Bonviva 150mg once monthly compared with placebo in post-menopausal women with osteopenia. Patients will be randomized to receive either Bonviva 150mg po monthly, or placebo monthly. The anticipated time on study treatment is 1-2 years, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Dec 2005
12 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 11, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 12, 2005
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2007
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 11, 2016
CompletedJanuary 11, 2016
December 1, 2015
2 years
August 11, 2005
December 5, 2015
December 5, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Relative Change From Baseline in Mean Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the Lumbar Spine (L2 to L4) at Month 12
BMD was measured by a single dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan of the lumbar spine at the time of screening and at Month 12. A BMD measurement was considered unsuitable in case of detection of a fracture, an osteoarthritic process, or a scanning artifact that could not be removed to such a degree that accurate measurement of BMD would be considered jeopardized by the central reading center. The change in BMD was defined as the relative difference between the last individual measurement available at 12 months and Baseline, using the following formula: Relative change = 100 x (BMD at 1 year - BMD at baseline) / (BMD at baseline)
Baseline and Month 12
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Absolute Change From Baseline in Mean Lumbar Spine BMD at Month 12
Baseline and Month 12
Relative Change From Baseline in Mean Proximal Femur BMD at Month 12
Baseline and Month 12
Absolute Change From Baseline in BMD of the Proximal Femur at Month 12
Baseline and Month 12
Relative Change From Baseline in Serum C-telopeptide Crosslinks of Type 1 Collagen (CTX)
Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months
Absolute Change From Baseline in sCTX
Baseline and 3, 6, 12 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTAL2
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- women 45-60 years of age;
- post-menopausal;
- ambulatory.
You may not qualify if:
- vertebral fracture (except traumatic fracture such as in a motor vehicle accident);
- low-trauma osteoporotic fracture in any other bone;
- breast cancer diagnosed within last 20 years;
- other malignancy diagnosed within last 10 years, except successfully resected basal cell cancer;
- treatment with any bisphosphonate within last 2 years;
- treatment with other drugs affecting bone metabolism within last 6 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (12)
Unknown Facility
Lakewood, Colorado, 80227, United States
Unknown Facility
Stuart, Florida, 34996, United States
Unknown Facility
Bethesda, Maryland, 20817, United States
Unknown Facility
Detroit, Michigan, 48236, United States
Unknown Facility
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Unknown Facility
Omaha, Nebraska, 68131, United States
Unknown Facility
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106, United States
Unknown Facility
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45224, United States
Unknown Facility
Portland, Oregon, 97213, United States
Unknown Facility
Amarillo, Texas, 79124, United States
Unknown Facility
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502, United States
Unknown Facility
Richmond, Virginia, 23294, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Roche Trial Information Hotline
- Organization
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Clinical Trials
Hoffmann-La Roche
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 11, 2005
First Posted
August 12, 2005
Study Start
December 1, 2005
Primary Completion
December 1, 2007
Study Completion
December 1, 2007
Last Updated
January 11, 2016
Results First Posted
January 11, 2016
Record last verified: 2015-12