NCT00128102

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of an oral investigational drug suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (vorinostat, MK-0683) compared to placebo, in the treatment of participants with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma who have failed at least one prior chemotherapy regimen. The primary hypotheses are the following: (1) vorinostat improves overall survival (OS) compared to placebo (2) vorinostat is generally safe and well tolerated.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
661

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2005

Longer than P75 for phase_3

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 30, 2005

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 5, 2005

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 9, 2005

Completed
5.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 15, 2011

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 21, 2011

Completed
8.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

October 26, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

October 26, 2020

Status Verified

October 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

6 years

First QC Date

August 5, 2005

Results QC Date

October 1, 2020

Last Update Submit

October 1, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Overall Survival (OS)

    OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow up. The final analysis for OS was planned and performed at the time of the protocol pre-specified final statistical analysis with a data cut-off of 15-July-2011. OS analysis is reported here for all randomized participants.

    Up to ~72 months (through pre-specified final statistical analysis cut-off date of 15-July-2011)

  • Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events (AEs) Characterized as Grade 3 or Grade 4 According to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)

    An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition which is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE. Reporting of AEs per NCI CTCAE is based on 5 grades of severity; Grade 1 (mild; no treatment needed), Grade 2 (moderate; minimal treatment needed), Grade 3 (severe, not life threatening; hospitalization needed), Grade 4 (life threatening; urgent treatment needed) and Grade 5 (death).The final analysis for Grade 3 or 4 AEs was planned and performed at the time of the protocol pre-specified final statistical analysis with a data cut-off of 15-July-2011. Per protocol number of participants who experienced Grade 3/4 AEs per NCI CTCAE is reported here for all randomized participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment.

    Up to ~72 months (through pre-specified final statistical analysis cut-off date of 15-July-2011)

  • Number of Participants Who Experienced an AE

    An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition which is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE. The final analysis for participants who experienced an AE was planned and performed at the time of the protocol pre-specified final statistical analysis with a data cut-off of 15-July-2011. Per protocol number of participants who experienced an AE is reported here for all randomized participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment.

    Up to ~72 months (through pre-specified final statistical analysis cut-off date of 15-July-2011)

  • Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE

    An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition which is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE. The final analysis for participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE was planned and performed at the time of the protocol pre-specified final statistical analysis with a data cut-off of 15-July-2011. Per protocol number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is reported here for all randomized participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment. As specified by the protocol, participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE remained on study until investigator notification to discontinue.

    Up to ~72 months (through pre-specified final statistical analysis cut-off date of 15-July-2011)

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Up to ~72 months (through pre-specified final statistical analysis cut-off date of 15-July-2011)

  • Objective Response Rate (ORR)

    Up to ~72 months (through pre-specified final statistical analysis cut-off date of 15-July-2011)

  • Percent Change From Baseline in Lung Cancer Symptom Scale, Modified for Mesothelioma (LCSS-Meso) Dyspnea Score at Week 12

    Baseline, Week 12

  • Percentage of Participants With ≥50% Change Together With a >10 mm Change From Baseline in the LCSS-Meso Dyspnea Score at Week 12

    Baseline, Week 12

  • Percent Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 12

    Baseline, Week 12

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Vorinostat

EXPERIMENTAL

Vorinostat three 100 mg capsules twice daily for 3 consecutive days of treatment followed by 4 days of rest repeated weekly, in 21-day cycles. Treatment will continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Drug: Vorinostat

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Placebo capsules twice daily for 3 consecutive days of treatment followed by 4 days of rest repeated weekly, in 21-day cycles. Treatment will continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Drug: Placebo

Interventions

Vorinostat 100 mg oral capsules

Also known as: MK-0683, Zolinza
Vorinostat

Vorinostat-matching placebo oral capsules

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years or older with confirmed diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma
  • In countries where pemetrexed is an approved mesothelioma treatment, the participant's disease has progressed or relapsed following treatment with at least one prior chemotherapy regimen with pemetrexed and either cisplatin or carboplatin OR in countries where pemetrexed is not approved for mesothelioma, the participant's disease has progressed or relapsed following treatment with at least one prior chemotherapy regimen OR pemetrexed is not the preferred therapy for the participant and the participant's disease has progressed or relapsed following treatment with at least one prior chemotherapy regimen
  • Received no more than 2 prior systemic therapy regimens
  • Karnofsky performance scale status of ≥70
  • Has adequate bone marrow, liver, and kidney function and adequate coagulation (per prespecified laboratory values)
  • Participants who are receiving treatment with vorinostat and have not experienced progression of mesothelioma
  • Randomized to the placebo arm and: 1) have a Karnofsky performance scale status of ≥70; and 2) have adequate bone marrow, liver, and kidney function and adequate coagulation (per prespecified laboratory values)
  • Randomized to vorinostat and have discontinued study therapy for reasons other than progression of mesothelioma, if the investigator is of the opinion that the potential benefit outweighs potential risks associated with using vorinostat

You may not qualify if:

  • Has an active infection for which they received treatment with intravenous antibiotic, antiviral, or antifungal medications within 2 weeks of the start of study drug.
  • Has a "currently active" second malignancy; a malignancy is not considered "currently active" if participants have completed therapy for the second malignancy and are disease free from prior malignancies for \>5 years
  • Has uncontrolled brain metastases
  • Has a known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or HIV-related malignancy
  • Is pregnant or breast feeding
  • Has a history of gastrointestinal surgery or other procedures that might interfere with the absorption or swallowing of the study drug

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Krug LM, Kindler HL, Calvert H, Manegold C, Tsao AS, Fennell D, Ohman R, Plummer R, Eberhardt WE, Fukuoka K, Gaafar RM, Lafitte JJ, Hillerdal G, Chu Q, Buikhuisen WA, Lubiniecki GM, Sun X, Smith M, Baas P. Vorinostat in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma who have progressed on previous chemotherapy (VANTAGE-014): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Apr;16(4):447-56. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70056-2. Epub 2015 Mar 20.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

MesotheliomaLung Neoplasms

Interventions

Vorinostat

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AdenomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsNeoplasms, MesothelialRespiratory Tract NeoplasmsThoracic NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesHydroxamic AcidsHydroxylaminesHydroxy AcidsCarboxylic Acids

Results Point of Contact

Title
Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
Organization
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp

Study Officials

  • Medical Director

    Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2005

First Posted

August 9, 2005

Study Start

June 30, 2005

Primary Completion

July 15, 2011

Study Completion

November 21, 2011

Last Updated

October 26, 2020

Results First Posted

October 26, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf

More information