Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid (Vorinostat, MK-0683) Versus Placebo in Advanced Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MK-0683-014)
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Oral Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid (Vorinostat, MK-0683) in Patients With Advanced Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Previously Treated With Systemic Chemotherapy
4 other identifiers
interventional
661
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of an oral investigational drug suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (vorinostat, MK-0683) compared to placebo, in the treatment of participants with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma who have failed at least one prior chemotherapy regimen. The primary hypotheses are the following: (1) vorinostat improves overall survival (OS) compared to placebo (2) vorinostat is generally safe and well tolerated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Jun 2005
Longer than P75 for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 30, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 9, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 15, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 21, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 26, 2020
CompletedOctober 26, 2020
October 1, 2020
6 years
August 5, 2005
October 1, 2020
October 1, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow up. The final analysis for OS was planned and performed at the time of the protocol pre-specified final statistical analysis with a data cut-off of 15-July-2011. OS analysis is reported here for all randomized participants.
Up to ~72 months (through pre-specified final statistical analysis cut-off date of 15-July-2011)
Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events (AEs) Characterized as Grade 3 or Grade 4 According to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition which is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE. Reporting of AEs per NCI CTCAE is based on 5 grades of severity; Grade 1 (mild; no treatment needed), Grade 2 (moderate; minimal treatment needed), Grade 3 (severe, not life threatening; hospitalization needed), Grade 4 (life threatening; urgent treatment needed) and Grade 5 (death).The final analysis for Grade 3 or 4 AEs was planned and performed at the time of the protocol pre-specified final statistical analysis with a data cut-off of 15-July-2011. Per protocol number of participants who experienced Grade 3/4 AEs per NCI CTCAE is reported here for all randomized participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment.
Up to ~72 months (through pre-specified final statistical analysis cut-off date of 15-July-2011)
Number of Participants Who Experienced an AE
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition which is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE. The final analysis for participants who experienced an AE was planned and performed at the time of the protocol pre-specified final statistical analysis with a data cut-off of 15-July-2011. Per protocol number of participants who experienced an AE is reported here for all randomized participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment.
Up to ~72 months (through pre-specified final statistical analysis cut-off date of 15-July-2011)
Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE
An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product whether or not considered related to the use of the product. Any worsening of a pre-existing condition which is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product is also an AE. The final analysis for participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE was planned and performed at the time of the protocol pre-specified final statistical analysis with a data cut-off of 15-July-2011. Per protocol number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is reported here for all randomized participants who received ≥1 dose of study treatment. As specified by the protocol, participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE remained on study until investigator notification to discontinue.
Up to ~72 months (through pre-specified final statistical analysis cut-off date of 15-July-2011)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Up to ~72 months (through pre-specified final statistical analysis cut-off date of 15-July-2011)
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Up to ~72 months (through pre-specified final statistical analysis cut-off date of 15-July-2011)
Percent Change From Baseline in Lung Cancer Symptom Scale, Modified for Mesothelioma (LCSS-Meso) Dyspnea Score at Week 12
Baseline, Week 12
Percentage of Participants With ≥50% Change Together With a >10 mm Change From Baseline in the LCSS-Meso Dyspnea Score at Week 12
Baseline, Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 12
Baseline, Week 12
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Vorinostat
EXPERIMENTALVorinostat three 100 mg capsules twice daily for 3 consecutive days of treatment followed by 4 days of rest repeated weekly, in 21-day cycles. Treatment will continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo capsules twice daily for 3 consecutive days of treatment followed by 4 days of rest repeated weekly, in 21-day cycles. Treatment will continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years or older with confirmed diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma
- In countries where pemetrexed is an approved mesothelioma treatment, the participant's disease has progressed or relapsed following treatment with at least one prior chemotherapy regimen with pemetrexed and either cisplatin or carboplatin OR in countries where pemetrexed is not approved for mesothelioma, the participant's disease has progressed or relapsed following treatment with at least one prior chemotherapy regimen OR pemetrexed is not the preferred therapy for the participant and the participant's disease has progressed or relapsed following treatment with at least one prior chemotherapy regimen
- Received no more than 2 prior systemic therapy regimens
- Karnofsky performance scale status of ≥70
- Has adequate bone marrow, liver, and kidney function and adequate coagulation (per prespecified laboratory values)
- Participants who are receiving treatment with vorinostat and have not experienced progression of mesothelioma
- Randomized to the placebo arm and: 1) have a Karnofsky performance scale status of ≥70; and 2) have adequate bone marrow, liver, and kidney function and adequate coagulation (per prespecified laboratory values)
- Randomized to vorinostat and have discontinued study therapy for reasons other than progression of mesothelioma, if the investigator is of the opinion that the potential benefit outweighs potential risks associated with using vorinostat
You may not qualify if:
- Has an active infection for which they received treatment with intravenous antibiotic, antiviral, or antifungal medications within 2 weeks of the start of study drug.
- Has a "currently active" second malignancy; a malignancy is not considered "currently active" if participants have completed therapy for the second malignancy and are disease free from prior malignancies for \>5 years
- Has uncontrolled brain metastases
- Has a known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or HIV-related malignancy
- Is pregnant or breast feeding
- Has a history of gastrointestinal surgery or other procedures that might interfere with the absorption or swallowing of the study drug
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Krug LM, Kindler HL, Calvert H, Manegold C, Tsao AS, Fennell D, Ohman R, Plummer R, Eberhardt WE, Fukuoka K, Gaafar RM, Lafitte JJ, Hillerdal G, Chu Q, Buikhuisen WA, Lubiniecki GM, Sun X, Smith M, Baas P. Vorinostat in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma who have progressed on previous chemotherapy (VANTAGE-014): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Apr;16(4):447-56. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70056-2. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
PMID: 25800891RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
- Organization
- Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Director
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2005
First Posted
August 9, 2005
Study Start
June 30, 2005
Primary Completion
July 15, 2011
Study Completion
November 21, 2011
Last Updated
October 26, 2020
Results First Posted
October 26, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf