Gemcitabine in Combination With Either Cisplatin or Carboplatin in Treating Patients With Stage III or Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
A British Thoracic Oncology Group Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin at 80mg/m Versus Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin At 50 mg/m Versus Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin AUC 6 in Stage IIIB/IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
3 other identifiers
interventional
1,350
1 country
2
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine, cisplatin, and carboplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether giving gemcitabine together with cisplatin is more effective than giving gemcitabine together with carboplatin in treating non-small cell lung cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying gemcitabine and cisplatin to see how well they work compared to gemcitabine and carboplatin in treating patients with stage III or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 lung-cancer
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 2, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 3, 2005
CompletedAugust 26, 2013
May 1, 2007
June 2, 2005
August 23, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Length of survival
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Symptom control and quality of life as measured by the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 Items and Lung Cancer supplement 13 together with EuroQol-5 domain questionnaire
Treatment response as measured by RECIST criteria
Dose intensity of chemotherapy
Ratio of treatment courses given as in-patient versus out-patient
Toxicity as measured by CTCAE v3.0
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Institute of Clinical Research - Birmingham
Birmingham, England, B15 2TT, United Kingdom
Birmingham Heartlands Hospital
Birmingham, England, B9 5SS, United Kingdom
Related Publications (2)
Gijtenbeek RG, de Jong K, Venmans BJ, van Vollenhoven FH, Ten Brinke A, Van der Wekken AJ, van Geffen WH. Best first-line therapy for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 7;7(7):CD013382. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013382.pub2.
PMID: 37419867DERIVEDFerry D, Billingham L, Jarrett H, Dunlop D, Woll PJ, Nicolson M, Shah R, Thompson J, Spicer J, Muthukumar D, Skailes G, Leonard P, Chetiyawardana AD, Wells P, Lewanski C, Crosse B, Hill M, Gaunt P, O'Byrne K. Carboplatin versus two doses of cisplatin in combination with gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Results from a British Thoracic Oncology Group randomised phase III trial. Eur J Cancer. 2017 Sep;83:302-312. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.05.037. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
PMID: 28780466DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Hugh Jarrett
Institute of Clinical Research - Birmingham
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 2, 2005
First Posted
June 3, 2005
Study Start
March 1, 2005
Last Updated
August 26, 2013
Record last verified: 2007-05