Greenwich Lumbar Stenosis SLIP Study
SLIP
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine the proper use of lower back screws and rods (instrumentation) and bony fusion in subjects with one level of degenerative spinal narrowing (stenosis) compressing nerves to the legs with one spinal bone slipping forward on another (spondylolisthesis). There are two types of operations that surgeons perform for this problem. Some spinal surgeons remove some bone in the back (laminectomy) to decompress the nerves. Other surgeons perform a laminectomy (decompression) as above, but feel that it is also important to strengthen the back by placing screws and rods into the spine and adding more bone to obtain a new bridge of bone away from the nerves (decompression with instrumented fusion). This study aims to test the hypothesis that adding instrumented fusion to a decompression for this spinal problem will improve long term patient outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started May 2002
Longer than P75 for phase_3
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2002
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 26, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 26, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2014
CompletedDecember 3, 2015
December 1, 2015
7.3 years
April 26, 2005
December 2, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
SF-36 (physical component summary score)
2 year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Oswestry Disability Index
2 year, 3 year, 4 year
Major Complication rate
30 days
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORLumbar Laminectomy without Fusion
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORLumbar Laminectomy with Pedicle Screw Instrumented Fusion
Interventions
Removal of bone to decompress spinal nerves with placement of spinal screws and extra bone to strengthen the spine
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis and single level grade I spondylolisthesis (3-14 mm)
You may not qualify if:
- History of previous lumbar spinal surgery in region of stenosis
- Gross spinal instability (defined as greater than 3 mm motion on flexion/extension studies)
- Serious medical illness (ASA Class III or higher)
- Spondylolisthesis greater than 14 mm or associated with spondylolysis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
Greenwich Hospital
Greenwich, Connecticut, 06830, United States
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Lahey Clinic
Burlington, Massachusetts, 01805, United States
Cleveland Clinic Spine Institute
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, United States
Related Publications (6)
Ghogawala Z, Benzel EC, Amin-Hanjani S, Barker FG 2nd, Harrington JF, Magge SN, Strugar J, Coumans JV, Borges LF. Prospective outcomes evaluation after decompression with or without instrumented fusion for lumbar stenosis and degenerative Grade I spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004 Oct;1(3):267-72. doi: 10.3171/spi.2004.1.3.0267.
PMID: 15478364BACKGROUNDFischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN, Brower R, Montgomery DM, Kurz LT. 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Dec 15;22(24):2807-12. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199712150-00003.
PMID: 9431616BACKGROUNDHerkowitz HN, Kurz LT. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Jul;73(6):802-8.
PMID: 2071615BACKGROUNDGhogawala Z, Dziura J, Butler WE, Dai F, Terrin N, Magge SN, Coumans JV, Harrington JF, Amin-Hanjani S, Schwartz JS, Sonntag VK, Barker FG 2nd, Benzel EC. Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1424-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1508788.
PMID: 27074067DERIVEDGhogawala Z, Schwartz JS, Benzel EC, Magge SN, Coumans JV, Harrington JF, Gelbs JC, Whitmore RG, Butler WE, Barker FG 2nd. Increased Patient Enrollment to a Randomized Surgical Trial Through Equipoise Polling of an Expert Surgeon Panel. Ann Surg. 2016 Jul;264(1):81-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001483.
PMID: 26501698DERIVEDBlumenthal C, Curran J, Benzel EC, Potter R, Magge SN, Harrington JF Jr, Coumans JV, Ghogawala Z. Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Apr;18(4):340-6. doi: 10.3171/2013.1.SPINE12537. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
PMID: 23373567DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Zoher Ghogawala, MD
Yale University School of Medicine (Greenwich Hospital)
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Edward C Benzel, MD
Cleveland Clinic Spine Institute (Cleveland Clinic Foundation)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 26, 2005
First Posted
April 26, 2005
Study Start
May 1, 2002
Primary Completion
September 1, 2009
Study Completion
October 1, 2014
Last Updated
December 3, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-12