Decompression vs. Fusion for Stable Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
Decompression Alone vs. Decompression and Instrumented Fusion for the Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Stable Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Pilot Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
8
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of a full-scale multicenter randomized, controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of two surgical treatments for a condition associated with lumbar spinal stenosis called degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Both treatments are currently used, but individual surgeons use different selection criteria for each treatment and use the procedures at different rates. The two procedures are decompression with fusion (the most common surgical procedure for spondylolisthesis) and midline-sparing decompression alone (which is also a standard treatment, but is not as widely used for treating spondylolisthesis). The investigators plan to collect the evidence on the following:
- 1.The feasibility of the trial protocol, and
- 2.Preliminary data on the effectiveness of each treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 9, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 28, 2015
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2023
CompletedNovember 9, 2022
November 1, 2022
7.9 years
September 9, 2014
November 4, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Number of patients recruited
1 year
Number of eligible patients
1 year
Reasons for refusal to consent
1 year
Proportion of patients who adhere to randomized allocation
2 years
Number of patients refusing to consent due to blinding
1 year
Blinding status
Patient's assessment of which treatment they received
1.5 months post-surgery
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
10-item patient-reported questionnaire measuring disability related to low back pain. Each item has six response options ranging from 0 to 5; the responses are summed and rescaled so 0 indicates no disability and 100 indicates extreme disability.
6-18 weeks, 6 months (optional), 12 months, and 24 months post-surgery
Proportion of patients who receive randomized allocation
2 years
Number of patients refusing to consent due to randomization
1 year
Number, type and severity of adverse events
End of hospital stay (average 6.5 days post-surgery)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Short-Form 12 scores: Physical Function, Bodily Pain, Physical Component Summary
Baseline; 6-18 weeks, 6 months (optional), 12 months, and 24 months post-surgery
Euro-QoL health utility index
Baseline; 6-18 weeks, 6 months (optional), 12 months, and 24 months post-surgery
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score
Baseline
Costs incurred by patients
monthly from 1.5 to 12 months post-surgery; 24 months post-surgery
Hospital cost
End of hospital stay (average 6.5 days post-surgery)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Decompression with fusion
ACTIVE COMPARATORSpinal decompression surgery with instrumented spinal fusion
Decompression alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORMidline-sparing spinal decompression alone
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients deemed to be surgical candidates with focal (1-2 level) lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and associated stable degenerative spondylolisthesis with the following characteristics:
- a clinical history of back, buttock and leg pain with walking or standing that is improved when lying, sitting or bending forward
- a clinical history of leg symptoms that are greater than or equal to back symptoms with walking or standing, and
- greater than 6 months of symptoms with failed conservative care
- aged 50 or over
- sufficient fluency in English or French to provide informed consent and complete questionnaires with or without the need of an interpreter
You may not qualify if:
- Greater than 25% listhesis or spinal instability as demonstrated by motion (\>5mm of translation) on flexion extension radiographs or non-loaded (MRI/CT or supine x-rays) to loaded imaging (standing radiograph)
- Presence of kyphosis (\>0 degrees at the affected level or globally), degenerative scoliosis (\>10 degree using the Cobb method) with rotatory or lateral listhesis on preoperative x-rays
- Clinical history of osteoporotic fracture or chronic oral steroid use
- Previous posterior lumbar spinal surgery (excluding prior microdiscectomy)
- Patients who have evidence of neurological disorders that affect physical function (e.g. peripheral neuropathy), neuromuscular disorders (e.g. multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's etc.) or systemic illness (e.g. inflammatory arthritis) that affects physical function
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (8)
Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2N9, Canada
Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada
Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9, Canada
London Health Sciences Centre - Victoria Hospital
London, Ontario, N6A 5W9, Canada
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, Canada
Montreal General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yoga Raja Rampersaud, MD FRCSC
University Health Network, Toronto
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anthony Perruccio, PhD
University Health Network, Toronto
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 9, 2014
First Posted
January 28, 2015
Study Start
July 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 1, 2023
Study Completion
September 1, 2023
Last Updated
November 9, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11