Alternative Dosing Regimens of Subcutaneous Azacitidine for Myelodysplastic Syndromes
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study Comparing Three Alternative Dosing Regimens of Subcutaneous Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive Care for the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes
1 other identifier
interventional
151
1 country
31
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if azacitidine, combined with Best Supportive Care (BSC), is effective in treating myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) when given according to a different doses and dosing schedules.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jan 2005
Typical duration for phase_2
31 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 31, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 1, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 28, 2010
CompletedNovember 22, 2019
November 1, 2019
3.6 years
January 31, 2005
May 3, 2010
November 7, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Number of Participants In Best Hematological Response Categories as Determined by the Investigator Using International Working Group 2000 (IWG 2000) Criteria For Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) During the Initial Study Period.
Participant counts by best hematological response; complete remission(CR) is better than a partial remission(PR) which is better than stable disease(SD). Investigator determined responses followed IWG 2000 criteria for MDS CR: repeat bone marrow show \<5% myeloblasts, and peripheral blood evaluations lasting \>=2 months of hemoglobin(\>110 g/L), neutrophils(\>=1.5x10\^9/L), platelets(\>=100x10\^9/L), blasts (0%) and no dysplasia PR is the same as CR for peripheral blood: bone marrow shows blasts decrease by \>=50% or a less advanced FAB classification from pretreatment (see Population Descrip)
Day 1 (randomization) to 6 months
Number of Participants With Best Hematological Improvement Derived Using International Working Group 2000 (IWG 2000) Criteria for MDS During the Initial Study Period.
IWG 2000 Criteria: Pretreatment=hemoglobin \<110g/L or RBC transfusion-dependence, platelet count \<100x10\^9/L or platelet transfusion dependence, absolute neutrophil count \<1.5x10\^9/L. Erythroid response: Major-\>20g/L increase in hemoglobin or transfusion independence. Minor- 10-20g/L increase in hemoglobin or \>=50% decrease in transfusion requirements. Platelet response: Major-absolute increase of platelet count by \>=30x10\^9/L or platelet transfusion independence. Minor-\>=50% increase in platelet count with net increase \>10x10\^9/L but \<30x10\^9/L. (continued in Population Description)
Day 1 (randomization) to 6 months
Number of Participants With Overall Best Hematologic Response and Hematologic Improvement Based on IWG 2000 Criteria For MDS During the Initial Study Period
Number of participants whose best hematological outcome was either complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR) (as determined by the investigator), or any hematologic improvement (based on the IWG 2000 criteria for MDS). See previous outcomes for detailed definitions.
Day 1 (randomization) to 6 months
Number of Participants Who Improved or Maintained The Hematologic Response From the Initial Study Period (Based on IWG 2000 Criteria For MDS) During the Maintenance Period
Hematologic response during the maintenance period are compared to the response in the initial study period. Initial response could have been a complete remission, a partial remission, stable disease or a hematologic improvement. Maintenance period best response is after randomization to a maintenance arm for those randomized, and is after the start of cycle 7 for those remaining on initial period treatment throughout the study.
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Baseline Hemoglobin Values
Day 1 (randomization)
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at End of Initial Study Period (6 Months)
6 months
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at the End of the Maintenance Study Period
24 months
Baseline Platelet Values
Day 1 (randomization)
Change From Baseline in Platelets at the End of Initial Study Period (6 Months)
6 months
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (5)
Aza-5
EXPERIMENTALAzacitidine administered subcutaneously at 75mg/m\^2 for 5 days on a 28 day cycle.
Aza-5-2-2
EXPERIMENTALAzacitidine administered subcutaneously at 75mg/m\^2 for 5days with 2 days off, then for an additional 2 days, on a 28 day cycle.
Aza-5-2-5
EXPERIMENTALAzacitidine administered subcutaneously at 50mg/m\^2 for 5 days with 2 days off, then for an additional 5 days, on a 28 day cycle.
Maintenance Aza 5 days q 4 weeks
EXPERIMENTALAzacitidine administered subcutaneously at 75mg/m\^2 for 5 days every 4 weeks.
Maintenance Aza 5 days q 6 weeks
EXPERIMENTALAzacitidine administered subcutaneously at 75mg/m\^2 for 5 days every 6 weeks.
Interventions
Azacitidine is administered subcutaneously Total of 18 cycles on treatment or early discontinuation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of refractory anemia, refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts and at least one of the following: a)Anemia with hemoglobin \<110g/L and requires at least 1 unit packed red blood cell transfusions every 28 days; b)Thrombocytopenia with platelet counts \<100 x 10\^9/L; or c)Neutropenia with absolute neutrophil count \<1.5 x 10\^9/L.
- OR, Refractory anemia with excess blasts or refractory anemia with excess blast in transformation, according to the French-American-British classification system for MDS.
- At least 18 years of age.
- Have a life expectancy of \>7 months.
- Unlikely to proceed to bone marrow or stem cell transplantation therapy following remission.
- Have serum bilirubin levels less than or equal to 1.5 times the upper limit of the normal (ULN) range for the laboratory.
- Have serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (aspartate aminotransferase) or serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (alanine aminotransferase) levels less than or equal to 2 x ULN.
- Have serum creatinine levels less than or equal to 1.5 x ULN.
You may not qualify if:
- Secondary MDS.
- Prior treatment with azacitidine.
- Any prior history of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML).
- Malignant or metastatic disease within the previous 12 months.
- Uncorrected red cell folate deficiency or vitamin B12 deficiency.
- Hepatic tumors.
- Radiation, chemotherapy, or cytotoxic therapy for non-MDS conditions in the previous 12 months.
- Known or suspected hypersensitivity to azacitidine or mannitol.
- Prior transplantation or cytotoxic therapy to treat MDS. Prior use of Revlimid and Thalomid allowed after 30 day washout.
- Serious medical illness likely to limit survival to less than or equal to 7 months.
- Treatment with androgenic hormones during the previous 14 days
- Active viral infection with known human immunodeficiency virus or vial hepatitis Type B or C.
- Treatment with other investigational drugs with the previous 30 days.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Celgenelead
Study Sites (31)
Comprehensive Blood and Cancer Center, Research Department
Bakersfield, California, 93309, United States
Tower Cancer Research Foundation
Beverly Hills, California, 90211, United States
Cancer Center of Colorado Springs, The Oncology Clinic, PC
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80907, United States
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, LLP
Denver, Colorado, 80218, United States
Washington Cancer Institute
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States
Florida Cancer Institute
New Port Richey, Florida, 34652, United States
Cancer Centers of Florida, P.A.
Ocoee, Florida, 34761, United States
Joliet Oncology-Hematology Associates, Ltd.
Joliet, Illinois, 60435, United States
Oncology/Hematology Associates of Central Illinois, PC
Peoria, Illinois, 61615-7828, United States
Central Indiana Cancer Centers
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46227, United States
Hematology & Oncology Specialists LLC
Metairie, Louisiana, 70115, United States
Great Lakes Cancer Institute Breslin Cancer Center
Lansing, Michigan, 48910, United States
The Center for Cancer Care and Research
St Louis, Missouri, 63141, United States
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601, United States
Greater Dayton Cancer Center
Kettering, Ohio, 45409, United States
Western Pennsylvania Cancer Institute
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224, United States
Oncology Services of Aberdeen
Aberdeen, South Dakota, 57401, United States
Avera Cancer Institute Leukemia-Bone Marrow Transplant Center
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57105, United States
McLeod Cancer and Blood Center
Johnson City, Tennessee, 37604, United States
The Sarah Cannon Research Institute
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States
Texas Oncology, P.A.
Bedford, Texas, 76022, United States
Texas Cancer Center at Medical City
Dallas, Texas, 75230, United States
Texas Oncology, PA
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104, United States
San Antonio Tumor & Blood Clinic
Fredericksburg, Texas, 78624, United States
Cancer Care Centers of South Texas - HOAST
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
Virginia Oncology Associates - Lake Wright Cancer Center
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502, United States
Highline Medical Oncology
Burien, Washington, 98166, United States
Puget Sound Cancer Center
Edmonds, Washington, 98026, United States
Puget Sound Cancer Center
Seattle, Washington, 98133, United States
Cancer Care Northwest
Spokane, Washington, 99218, United States
Northwest Cancer Specialists, P.C.
Vancouver, Washington, 98684, United States
Related Publications (3)
R. Lyons, et al. Rapid onset of effectiveness with three alternative azacitidine (aza) dosing regimens in patients (pts) with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Haematologica 2008;93(suppl 1):Abs.0232.
BACKGROUNDLyons R, et al. Tolerability and hematologic improvement assessed using three alternative dosing schedules of azacitidine in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Presented at the 2007 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 1-5, 2007, Chicago, IL. Abstract No. 7083
BACKGROUNDKomrokji R, Swern AS, Grinblatt D, Lyons RM, Tobiasson M, Silverman LR, Sayar H, Vij R, Fliss A, Tu N, Sugrue MM. Azacitidine in Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes: A Meta-Analysis of Data from Prospective Studies. Oncologist. 2018 Feb;23(2):159-170. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0215. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
PMID: 29118268BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- CL Beach
- Organization
- Celgene Corporation
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
CL Beach
Celgene Corporation
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 31, 2005
First Posted
February 1, 2005
Study Start
January 1, 2005
Primary Completion
August 1, 2008
Study Completion
August 1, 2008
Last Updated
November 22, 2019
Results First Posted
May 28, 2010
Record last verified: 2019-11