A Study of Thalidomide Plus Dexamethasone (Thal-Dex) Versus DOXIL plusThalidomide Plus Dexamethasone (DOXIL -Thal-Dex) in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
A Randomized, Open-Label, Multi-Center Trial Comparing Thalidomide Plus Dexamethasone (Thal-Dex) Versus DOXIL plusThalidomide Plus Dexamethasone (DOXIL -Thal-Dex) in Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
2 other identifiers
interventional
225
1 country
58
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if Thalidomide + Dexamethasone or DOXIL (doxorubicin HCl liposome injection) + Thalidomide + Dexamethasone is more effective in treating newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma. The number of patients whose multiple myeloma disappears for a period of time (complete Response) will be studied to make the determination of which treatment is more effective.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 multiple-myeloma
Started Jan 2005
58 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 2, 2004
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2007
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 27, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2009
CompletedApril 7, 2017
February 1, 2017
2.7 years
December 1, 2004
October 2, 2008
February 20, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Complete Response Rate: Number of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response
Complete response rate to study medication is defined as number of participants who acheived complete response by the local investigator according to the current European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) criteria. According to EBMT criteria, CR is defined as the absence of serum and urine monoclonal paraprotein + plus no increase in size or number of lytic bone lesions. Complete response was assessed at the beginning of every treatment cycle prior to treatment, starting at Cycle 2.
From Cycle 2 until 28 days following completion of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Overall Response: Number of Participants Who Achieved a Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)
From Cycle 2 until 28 days following completion of treatment
Time to 1st Response
From Cycle 2 until 28 days following completion of treatment
Time to Progression
From randomization until death or as assessed up to 2 years post last participant last treatment visit
Overall Survival: Number of Participants Died Due to Any Cause
From randomization until death or as assessed up to 2 years post last participant last treatment visit
Transplantation: Number of Participants Who Underwent Transplantation (Peripheral Stem Cell / Bone Marrow)
From randomization until death or as assessed up to 2 years post last participant last treatment visit
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Thalidomide + dexamethasone
ACTIVE COMPARATORThalidomide + dexamethasone + DOXIL
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Participants will receive thalidomide orally every night (at bedtime) without food on days 1-28 and dosing will gradually increase during Cycle 1 starting at 50 mg on 1 to 7 days, 100 mg on 8 to 14 days, 150 mg on 15 to 21 days, and 200 mg 22 to 28 days. Thalidomide 200 mg per day will be administered for subsequent cycles. Participants will receive thalidomide for minimum of 4 cycles and a maximum of 12 cycles.
Participants will receive dexamethasone 40 mg orally on Days 1 to 4, 9 to 12 and 17 to 20.
DOXIL 40 mg/m2 will be administered iintravenously (into a vein) on Day 1.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Previously untreated, histologically confirmed multiple myeloma (per International Myeloma Working Group \[IMWG\] criteria
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status 0-2
- Adequate absolute neutrophil count (ANC), platelet count and hemoglobin
- Adequate serum calcium
- Enrollment in System for Thalidomide Education and Prescribing Safety Program (S.T.E.P.S.)
You may not qualify if:
- No treatment with dexamethasone for multiple myeloma
- No peripheral neuropathy of Grade 2 or higher
- No Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) of less than 45 percentage
- No history of life-threatening thromboembolic events of any kind (ie, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, stroke or others), within 1 year before enrollment in the study
- No deep vein thrombosis (DVT) within 1 year of enrollment
- No current anticoagulation for DVT
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (58)
Unknown Facility
Fountain Valley, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Greenbrae, California, United States
Unknown Facility
La Verne, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Los Angeles, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Denver, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
New London, Connecticut, United States
Unknown Facility
Boca Raton, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Orange City, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Ormond Beach, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Lawrenceville, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Wichita, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Unknown Facility
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States
Unknown Facility
Columbia, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Unknown Facility
Englewood, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Jersey City, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Voorhees Township, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Albany, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Armonk, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Box 302, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Brooklyn, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Nyack, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
The Bronx, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Valhalla, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Eugene, Oregon, United States
Unknown Facility
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Easley, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Sumter, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Bedford, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Dallas, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Fredericksburg, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Burlington, Vermont, United States
Unknown Facility
Fairfax, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Spokane, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Vancouver, Washington, United States
Unknown Facility
Yakima, Washington, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Director
- Organization
- Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L. C. Clinical Trial
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2004
First Posted
December 2, 2004
Study Start
January 1, 2005
Primary Completion
October 1, 2007
Study Completion
October 1, 2009
Last Updated
April 7, 2017
Results First Posted
November 27, 2008
Record last verified: 2017-02