Erlotinib Compared With Temozolomide or Carmustine in Treating Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme
Randomized Phase II of TARCEVA™ (Erlotinib) Versus Temozolomide Or BCNU in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme
1 other identifier
interventional
110
5 countries
10
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Erlotinib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking the enzymes necessary for their growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as temozolomide and carmustine, work in different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known whether erlotinib is more effective than temozolomide or carmustine in treating recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying erlotinib to see how well it works compared to temozolomide or carmustine in treating patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started May 2004
Longer than P75 for phase_2
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2004
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 12, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2011
CompletedJuly 27, 2017
July 1, 2017
1.8 years
July 8, 2004
July 26, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Progression-free survival at 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Response (complete [CR] or partial response [PR]) measured by McDonald's criteria at least 4 weeks after first documented response and every 8 weeks until disease progression or until start of another treatment
Severe toxic events assessed by CTCAE v3.0 at the end of each course
Progression-free survival at 1 year
Overall survival at 6 months and 1 year
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
U.Z. Gasthuisberg
Leuven, B-3000, Belgium
Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Georges-Francois Leclerc
Dijon, 21079, France
Centre Regional Rene Gauducheau
Nantes-Saint Herblain, 44805, France
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
Nice, 06189, France
CHU Pitie-Salpetriere
Paris, 75651, France
Institut Gustave Roussy
Villejuif, F-94805, France
Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova
Padua, 35128, Italy
University Medical Center Rotterdam at Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, 3000 CA, Netherlands
Medisch Centrum Haaglanden
The Hague, 2501 CK, Netherlands
Western Infirmary
Glasgow, Scotland, G11 6NT, United Kingdom
Related Publications (2)
van den Bent MJ, Brandes AA, Rampling R, Kouwenhoven MC, Kros JM, Carpentier AF, Clement PM, Frenay M, Campone M, Baurain JF, Armand JP, Taphoorn MJ, Tosoni A, Kletzl H, Klughammer B, Lacombe D, Gorlia T. Randomized phase II trial of erlotinib versus temozolomide or carmustine in recurrent glioblastoma: EORTC brain tumor group study 26034. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Mar 10;27(8):1268-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.5984. Epub 2009 Feb 9.
PMID: 19204207RESULTvan den Bent MJ, Brandes A, Rampling R, et al.: Randomized phase II trial of erlotinib (E) versus temozolomide (TMZ) or BCNU in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM): EORTC 26034. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-2005, 2007.
RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Martin J. van Den Bent, MD
Daniel Den Hoed Cancer Center at Erasmus Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2004
First Posted
July 12, 2004
Study Start
May 1, 2004
Primary Completion
March 1, 2006
Study Completion
March 1, 2011
Last Updated
July 27, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07