Irinotecan in Treating Patients With Advanced Cancer of the Stomach
A Phase II Trial of CPT-11 in Patients With Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach or Gastroesophageal Junction Incorporating Pretreatment and Posttreatment Biopsies for Evaluation of Tumor Thymidylate Synthase, MIB-1, Topoisomerase I, and p53
2 other identifiers
interventional
70
2 countries
19
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of irinotecan in treating patients who have advanced cancer of the stomach.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Dec 1997
Longer than P75 for phase_2
19 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 1997
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 1, 1999
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2004
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2004
CompletedJuly 14, 2016
July 1, 2016
6.6 years
November 1, 1999
July 12, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
response rate
Up to 3 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
survival
Up to 3 years
Study Arms (1)
irinotecan
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive irinotecan (CPT-11) by IV over 90 minutes every 3 weeks. Dosage modifications are made based on toxicity. Retreatment may be delayed another 3 weeks (for a total of 6 weeks) to allow for recovery from toxic effects. Patient is taken off study if they do not recover from toxic effects, unless cause is documented to be unrelated to CPT-11. Patients with stable disease or partial response continue on treatment until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Patients with complete response continue on treatment for another 2 courses and then are observed. Patients are followed every 3 months for 3 years or until disease progression.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (19)
CCOP - Scottsdale Oncology Program
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259-5404, United States
Mayo Clinic Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States
CCOP - Illinois Oncology Research Association
Peoria, Illinois, 61602, United States
CCOP - Carle Cancer Center
Urbana, Illinois, 61801, United States
CCOP - Cedar Rapids Oncology Project
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 52403-1206, United States
CCOP - Iowa Oncology Research Association
Des Moines, Iowa, 50309-1016, United States
Siouxland Hematology-Oncology
Sioux City, Iowa, 51101-1733, United States
CCOP - Wichita
Wichita, Kansas, 67214-3882, United States
CCOP - Duluth
Duluth, Minnesota, 55805, United States
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
CentraCare Clinic
Saint Cloud, Minnesota, 56303, United States
CCOP - Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium
Omaha, Nebraska, 68131, United States
Medcenter One Health System
Bismarck, North Dakota, 58501, United States
CCOP - Merit Care Hospital
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122, United States
Altru Health Systems
Grand Forks, North Dakota, 58201, United States
CCOP - Geisinger Clinic and Medical Center
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822-2001, United States
Rapid City Regional Hospital
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57709, United States
CCOP - Sioux Community Cancer Consortium
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57104, United States
Allan Blair Cancer Centre
Regina, Saskatchewan, S4T 7T1, Canada
Related Publications (2)
Jatoi A, Foster NR, Egner JR, Burch PA, Stella PJ, Rubin J, Dakhil SR, Sargent DJ, Murphy BR, Alberts SR. Older versus younger patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, and stomach: a pooled analysis of eight consecutive North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) trials. Int J Oncol. 2010 Mar;36(3):601-6. doi: 10.3892/ijo_00000535.
PMID: 20126980BACKGROUNDErlichman C, Goldberg RM, Mahoney MR, et al.: A phase II trial of CPT-11 in patients (pts) with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal (GE) junction adenocarcinoma (ADCA): a clinical and pharmacodynamic evaluation. A North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) study. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 23 (Suppl 16): A-4026, 314s, 2005.
RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Richard M. Goldberg, MD
Mayo Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 1, 1999
First Posted
January 22, 2004
Study Start
December 1, 1997
Primary Completion
July 1, 2004
Study Completion
July 1, 2004
Last Updated
July 14, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-07