NCT00002893

Brief Summary

RATIONALE: Palliative chemotherapy may help patients with advanced colorectal cancer live longer and more comfortably. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of and quality of life following three different palliative chemotherapy regimens in treating patients with advanced metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
900

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3 colorectal-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 1995

Completed
4.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 1, 1999

Completed
4.5 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 13, 2004

Completed
Last Updated

December 19, 2013

Status Verified

May 1, 2007

First QC Date

November 1, 1999

Last Update Submit

December 18, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

stage III colon cancerstage IV colon cancerstage III rectal cancerstage IV rectal cancerrecurrent colon cancerrecurrent rectal canceradenocarcinoma of the colonadenocarcinoma of the rectum

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum in one of the following categories: Locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent disease suitable only for palliative chemotherapy Evaluable disease outside prior radiotherapy field Patients with disease confined to the liver are referred to protocol MRC-CR05 PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: Not specified Performance status: WHO 0-2 Life expectancy: Greater than 3 months Hematopoietic: WBC at least 4,000 ANC at least 2,000 Platelets at least 100,000 Hepatic: Not specified Renal: Creatinine no greater than 1.25 times normal OR Creatinine clearance greater than 65 mL/min Cardiovascular: No uncontrolled heart failure No uncontrolled angina Other: No uncontrolled medical illness (including infection) Able and willing to complete quality-of-life questionnaires No prior or concurrent malignancy likely to interfere with protocol treatment or evaluation PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: No prior systemic chemotherapy except fluorouracil-based adjuvant regimen (e.g., QUASAR) At least 6 months since chemotherapy

Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Velindre Hospital

Cardiff, Wales, CF4 7XL, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Hale JP, Cohen DR, Maughan TS, Stephens RJ. Costs and consequences of different chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2002 Jun 5;86(11):1684-90. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600273.

    PMID: 12087450BACKGROUND
  • Hale JP, Cohen DR, Maughan TS, et al.: Comparative total societal costs of 3 alternative chemotherapy treatments for patients with advanced colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Br J Cancer 80 (suppl 2): A-P111, 56, 1999.

    BACKGROUND
  • Maughan TS, James RD, Kerr DJ, Ledermann JA, McArdle C, Seymour MT, Cohen D, Hopwood P, Johnston C, Stephens RJ; British MRC Colorectal Cancer Working Party. Comparison of survival, palliation, and quality of life with three chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2002 May 4;359(9317):1555-63. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08514-8.

  • Maughan T: Continous versus intermittent chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: preliminary results of the MRC CR06b randomised trial. [Abstract] Br J Cancer 85 (suppl 1): A-CT1, 1, 2001.

    RESULT
  • Maughan TS, James RD, Kerr DJ, et al.: Continous vs intermittant chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: preliminary results of the MRC Cr06b randomised trial. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 20: A-498, 2001.

    RESULT
  • Maughan TS, James RJ, Kerr DJ, et al.: Continous versus intermittent chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: preliminary results of the MRC CR06B randomised trial. [Abstract] Eur J Cancer 37 (suppl 6): A-1001, s271, 2001.

    RESULT
  • Maughan T, James R, Kerr D, et al.: Excess treatment related deaths and impaired quality of life show raltitrexed is inferior to infusional 5FU regimens in the palliative chemotherapy of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC): final analysis of the MRC CR06. [Abstract] Ann Oncol 11 (suppl 4): A-185o, 43, 2000.

    RESULT
  • Lederman JA, Maughan TS, James RD, et al.: Preliminary results of a multicentre randomised trial comparing 3 chemotherapy regimens (de Gramont, Lokich and Raltitrexed) in metastatic colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Br J Cancer 80 (suppl 2): A-4.10, 20, 1999.

    RESULT
  • Maughan TS, James RD, Kerr D, et al.: Preliminary results of a multicentre randomised trial comparing three chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 18: A1007, 1999.

    RESULT
  • Maughan TS, Robbe IJ, Parsons C: Outcomes regarding patient needs in comparing infusional 5FU regimens versus raltitrexed in a MRC multicenter randomised trial of advanced colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Br J Cancer 80 (suppl 2): A-P112, 56, 1999.

    RESULT
  • Maughan TS, Stephens RJ, Hopwood P, et al.: The value of quality of life outcomes in comparing 3 chemotherapy regimens (de Gramont. Lokich and Raltitrexed) in a multicentre randomised trial of metastatic colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Br J Cancer 80 (suppl 2): A-P113, 57, 1999.

    RESULT
  • Maughan TS, Stephens RJ, Hopwood T, et al.: The value of quality of life in comparing 3 chemotherapy regimens (de Gramont, Lokich & Raltitrexed) in a multicentre randomised trial of metastatic colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Br J Cancer 80 (suppl 2): A-P113, 57, 1999.

    RESULT
  • Stephens RJ, Hopwood P, Johnston C, et al.: The value of quality of life (QL) outcomes in comparing 3 chemotherapy regimens (de Gramont, Lokich, and Raltitrexed) in a multicentre randomised trial of metastatic colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 18: A2220, 1999.

    RESULT

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colorectal NeoplasmsColonic NeoplasmsRectal Neoplasms

Interventions

FluorouracilLeucovorinraltitrexed

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

UracilPyrimidinonesPyrimidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsFormyltetrahydrofolatesTetrahydrofolatesFolic AcidPterinsPteridinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingCoenzymesEnzymes and Coenzymes

Study Officials

  • Timothy Maughan, MD

    Velindre NHS Trust

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 1, 1999

First Posted

May 13, 2004

Study Start

June 1, 1995

Last Updated

December 19, 2013

Record last verified: 2007-05

Locations