Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM)
2 other identifiers
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
To determine whether electrophysiologic study (EPS) or Holter monitoring (HM) was the better method for selecting effective long-term antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or an episode of aborted sudden death.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jul 1985
Longer than P75 for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 1985
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 1992
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 27, 1999
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 28, 1999
CompletedJanuary 21, 2016
January 1, 2016
October 27, 1999
January 19, 2016
Conditions
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (43)
The ESVEM trial. Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring for selection of antiarrhythmic therapy of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The ESVEM Investigators. Circulation. 1989 Jun;79(6):1354-60. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.79.6.1354.
PMID: 2655967BACKGROUNDFreedman RA, Steinberg JS. Selective prolongation of QRS late potentials by sodium channel blocking antiarrhythmic drugs: relation to slowing of ventricular tachycardia. Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring Trial (ESVEM) Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Apr;17(5):1017-25. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90824-s.
PMID: 1848871BACKGROUNDBigger JT Jr, Fleiss JL, Rolnitzky LM, Steinman RC. Stability over time of heart period variability in patients with previous myocardial infarction and ventricular arrhythmias. The CAPS and ESVEM investigators. Am J Cardiol. 1992 Mar 15;69(8):718-23. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90493-i.
PMID: 1546643BACKGROUNDDeterminants of predicted efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs in the electrophysiologic study versus electrocardiographic monitoring trial. The ESVEM Investigators. Circulation. 1993 Feb;87(2):323-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.87.2.323.
PMID: 8425281BACKGROUNDMason JW. A comparison of electrophysiologic testing with Holter monitoring to predict antiarrhythmic-drug efficacy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Electrophysiologic Study versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1993 Aug 12;329(7):445-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199308123290701.
PMID: 8332149BACKGROUNDMason JW. A comparison of seven antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Electrophysiologic Study versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1993 Aug 12;329(7):452-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199308123290702.
PMID: 8332150BACKGROUNDLazzara R. Results of Holter ECG guided therapy for ventricular arrhythmias: the ESVEM trial. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1994 Mar;17(3 Pt 2):473-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb01415.x.
PMID: 7513876BACKGROUNDMason JW. Implications of the ESVEM trial for use of antiarrhythmic drugs that prolong cardiac repolarization. Am J Cardiol. 1993 Nov 26;72(16):59F-61F. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90964-e.
PMID: 8237831BACKGROUNDOmoigui NA, Marcus FI, Mason JW, Hahn EA, Hartz VL, Hlatky MA. Cost of initial therapy in the Electrophysiological Study Versus ECG Monitoring trial (ESVEM). Circulation. 1995 Feb 15;91(4):1070-6. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.4.1070.
PMID: 7850943BACKGROUNDBiblo LA, Carlson MD, Waldo AL. Insights into the Electrophysiology Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring Trial: its programmed stimulation protocol may introduce bias when assessing long-term antiarrhythmic drug therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Jun;25(7):1601-4. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00087-k.
PMID: 7759711BACKGROUNDAnderson KP, Walker R, Dustman T, Fuller M, Mori M. Spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia in the Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Aug;26(2):489-96. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)80027-e.
PMID: 7541813BACKGROUNDMonograph on Lessons Learned from ESVEM.II -- Mason JW, Guest Editor.
BACKGROUNDSteinbeck G, Greene HL. Management of patients with life-threatening sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias--the role of guided antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1996 May-Jun;38(6):419-28. doi: 10.1016/s0033-0620(96)80006-5.
PMID: 8638023BACKGROUNDSaksena S, Breithardt G, Dorian P, Greene HL, Madan N, Block M. Nonpharmacological therapy for malignant ventricular arrhythmias: implantable defibrillator trials. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1996 May-Jun;38(6):429-44. doi: 10.1016/s0033-0620(96)80007-7.
PMID: 8638024BACKGROUNDSaksena S, Madan N, Lewis C. Implanted cardioverter-defibrillators are preferable to drugs as primary therapy in sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1996 May-Jun;38(6):445-54. doi: 10.1016/s0033-0620(96)80008-9.
PMID: 8638025BACKGROUNDGaran H. A perspective on the ESVEM trial current knowledge: sotalol should not be the first-line agent in the management of ventricular arrhythmias. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1996 May-Jun;38(6):455-6. doi: 10.1016/s0033-0620(96)80009-0.
PMID: 8638026BACKGROUNDGaran H. A perspective on the ESVEM trial and current knowledge: catheter ablation for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1996 May-Jun;38(6):457-62. doi: 10.1016/s0033-0620(96)80010-7.
PMID: 8638027BACKGROUNDAnderson KP, Bigger JT Jr, Freedman RA. Electrocardiographic predictors in the ESVEM trial: unsustained ventricular tachycardia, heart period variability, and the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1996 May-Jun;38(6):463-88. doi: 10.1016/s0033-0620(96)80011-9.
PMID: 8638028BACKGROUNDAnderson KP, Hartz VL, Hahn EA, Moon TE. Design and analysis of the ESVEM Trial. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1996 May-Jun;38(6):489-502. doi: 10.1016/s0033-0620(96)80012-0.
PMID: 8638029BACKGROUNDWinters SL, Curwin JH. Sotalol and the management of ventricular arrhythmias: implications of ESVEM. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995 Mar;18(3 Pt 1):377-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb02534.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 7770355BACKGROUNDReiter MJ, Mann DE, Reiffel JE, Hahn E, Hartz V. Significance and incidence of concordance of drug efficacy predictions by Holter monitoring and electrophysiological study in the ESVEM Trial. Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring. Circulation. 1995 Apr 1;91(7):1988-95. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.7.1988.
PMID: 7895357BACKGROUNDGettes LS. ESVEM and the hazards of clinical trials. Circulation. 1995 Apr 1;91(7):1908-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.7.1908. No abstract available.
PMID: 7895345BACKGROUNDCampbell RW. Interpretation of the results of the Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) study: impact on algorithm for drug selection. Coron Artery Dis. 1994 Aug;5(8):682-5. doi: 10.1097/00019501-199408000-00006. No abstract available.
PMID: 8000621BACKGROUNDd'Avila A, Fenelon G, Nellens P, Brugada P. Interpretation of the results of the Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) study: electrocardiographic monitoring advocates' view. Coron Artery Dis. 1994 Aug;5(8):677-81. doi: 10.1097/00019501-199408000-00005. No abstract available.
PMID: 8000620BACKGROUNDMitchell LB, Wyse DG. Interpretation of the results of the Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) study: programmed ventricular stimulation advocates view. Coron Artery Dis. 1994 Aug;5(8):671-6. doi: 10.1097/00019501-199408000-00004. No abstract available.
PMID: 8000619BACKGROUNDKlein RC. Comparative efficacy of sotalol and class I antiarrhythmic agents in patients with ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation: results of the Electrophysiology Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) Trial. Eur Heart J. 1993 Nov;14 Suppl H:78-84. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/14.suppl_h.78.
PMID: 8293756BACKGROUNDMonograph on Lessons Learned from ESVEM I. Mason JW, Guest Editor. Publications in the monograph are the results of a meeting in August 1995 of the ESVEM investigators and a number of non-ESVEM investigators prominent in the field of electrophysiology. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the impact of ESVEM and developments in the field.
BACKGROUNDMason JW, Marcus FI, Bigger JT, Lazzara R, Reiffel JA, Reiter MJ, Mann D. A summary and assessment of the findings and conclusions of the ESVEM trial. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1996 Mar-Apr;38(5):347-58. doi: 10.1016/s0033-0620(96)80028-4.
PMID: 8604439BACKGROUNDReiffel JA, Reiter MJ, Freedman RA, Mann D, Huang SK, Hahn E, Hartz V, Mason J; ESVEM Investigators. Influence of Holter monitor and electrophysiologic study methods and efficacy criteria on the outcome of patients with ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation in the ESVEM trial. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1996 Mar-Apr;38(5):359-70. doi: 10.1016/s0033-0620(96)80029-6.
PMID: 8604440BACKGROUNDHlatky MA. Cost and efficacy analysis in the ESVEM trial: implications for diagnosis and therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1996 Mar-Apr;38(5):371-6. doi: 10.1016/s0033-0620(96)80030-2.
PMID: 8604441BACKGROUNDMitchell LB, Duff HJ, Gillis AM, Ramadan D, Wyse DG. A randomized clinical trial of the noninvasive and invasive approaches to drug therapy for ventricular tachycardia: long-term follow-up of the Calgary trial. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1996 Mar-Apr;38(5):377-84. doi: 10.1016/s0033-0620(96)80031-4.
PMID: 8604442BACKGROUNDTakami Y, Ohtsuka G, Mueller J, Ebner M, Tayama E, Ohashi Y, Taylor D, Fernandes J, Schima H, Schmallegger H, Wolner E, Nose Y. Current progress in the development of a totally implantable Gyro centrifugal artificial heart. ASAIO J. 1998 May-Jun;44(3):207-11. doi: 10.1097/00002480-199805000-00016.
PMID: 9617953BACKGROUNDAnderson J. Implantable defibrillators are preferable to pharmacologic therapy for patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias: an antagonist's viewpoint. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1996 Mar-Apr;38(5):393-400. doi: 10.1016/s0033-0620(96)80033-8.
PMID: 8604444BACKGROUNDCannom DS, Ruggio J. Specialty care at the crossroads: electrophysiology practice in the managed-care era. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1996 Mar-Apr;38(5):401-6. doi: 10.1016/s0033-0620(96)80034-x.
PMID: 8604445BACKGROUNDReiter MJ, Karagounis LA, Mann DE, Reiffel JA, Hahn E, Hartz V. Reproducibility of drug efficacy predictions by Holter monitoring in the electrophysiologic study versus electrocardiographic monitoring (ESVEM) trial. ESVEM Investigators. Am J Cardiol. 1997 Feb 1;79(3):315-22. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00754-0.
PMID: 9036751BACKGROUNDPrystowsky EN. Electrophysiologic Study versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM): a critical appraisal. Control Clin Trials. 1996 Jun;17(3 Suppl):28S-36S. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(96)00042-6.
PMID: 8877265BACKGROUNDReiffel JA. Implications of the Electrophysiologic Study versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring trial for controlling ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 1996 Aug 29;78(4A):34-40. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00451-1.
PMID: 8780327BACKGROUNDKaragounis LA, Stein KM, Bair T, Albright D, Anderson JL. Fractal dimension predicts arrhythmia recurrence in patients being treated for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. ESVEM Investigators. J Electrocardiol. 1995;28 Suppl:71-3. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(95)80019-0. No abstract available.
PMID: 8656133BACKGROUNDReiffel JA, Hahn E, Hartz V, Reiter MJ. Sotalol for ventricular tachyarrhythmias: beta-blocking and class III contributions, and relative efficacy versus class I drugs after prior drug failure. ESVEM Investigators. Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring. Am J Cardiol. 1997 Apr 15;79(8):1048-53. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00045-3.
PMID: 9114762BACKGROUNDCaruso AC, Marcus FI, Hahn EA, Hartz VL, Mason JW. Predictors of arrhythmic death and cardiac arrest in the ESVEM trial. Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electromagnetic Monitoring. Circulation. 1997 Sep 16;96(6):1888-92. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.6.1888.
PMID: 9323077BACKGROUNDMann DE, Hartz V, Hahn EA, Reiter MJ. Effect of reproducibility of baseline arrhythmia induction on drug efficacy predictions and outcome in the Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring (ESVEM) trial. Am J Cardiol. 1997 Dec 1;80(11):1448-52. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00729-7.
PMID: 9399720BACKGROUNDOlshansky B, Hartz V, Hahn E, Mason J, Weaver MD; ESVEM Investigators. Location of death (in-hospital or out-of-hospital) and type of death (arrhythmic, nonarrhythmic, noncardiac) after inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias after syncope, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or nonfatal cardiac arrest (the ESVEM trial). Am J Cardiol. 2000 Oct 15;86(8):846-51. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01104-8.
PMID: 11024399BACKGROUNDOlshansky B, Hahn EA, Hartz VL, Prater SP, Mason JW. Clinical significance of syncope in the electrophysiologic study versus electrocardiographic monitoring (ESVEM) trial. The ESVEM Investigators. Am Heart J. 1999 May;137(5):878-86. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70412-6.
PMID: 10220637BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 27, 1999
First Posted
October 28, 1999
Study Start
July 1, 1985
Study Completion
December 1, 1992
Last Updated
January 21, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-01