Success Metrics

Clinical Success Rate
100.0%

Based on 2 completed trials

Completion Rate
100%(2/2)
Active Trials
0(0%)
Results Posted
0%(0 trials)

Phase Distribution

Ph not_applicable
2
67%

Phase Distribution

0

Early Stage

0

Mid Stage

0

Late Stage

Phase Distribution2 total trials
N/ANon-phased studies
2(100.0%)

Highest Phase Reached

Unknown

Trial Status & Enrollment

Completion Rate

100.0%

2 of 2 finished

Non-Completion Rate

0.0%

0 ended early

Currently Active

0

trials recruiting

Total Trials

3

all time

Status Distribution
Active(1)
Completed(2)

Detailed Status

Completed2
Not yet recruiting1

Development Timeline

Analytics

Development Status

Total Trials
3
Active
0
Success Rate
100.0%
Most Advanced
N/A

Trials by Phase

N/A2 (100.0%)

Trials by Status

completed267%
not_yet_recruiting133%

Recent Activity

0 active trials
Showing 3 of 3
completednot_applicable

A Comparative Study Between Effect Of Mini-gastric Bypass and Single Anastmosis Sleeve Jujenal Bypass On Levels Of GLP-1, GIP, PYY, Insulin Resistance and Type II DM Resolution

NCT07475143
completed

Outcomes of Single Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal Bypass (SAS-J) VS Sleeve Gastrectomy

NCT07413237
not_yet_recruitingnot_applicable

Single Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal Bypass Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in Management of Morbid Obese Patients: A Comparative Study

NCT06857097

Clinical Trials (3)

Showing 3 of 3 trials
NCT07475143Not Applicable

A Comparative Study Between Effect Of Mini-gastric Bypass and Single Anastmosis Sleeve Jujenal Bypass On Levels Of GLP-1, GIP, PYY, Insulin Resistance and Type II DM Resolution

Completed
NCT07413237

Outcomes of Single Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal Bypass (SAS-J) VS Sleeve Gastrectomy

Completed
NCT06857097Not Applicable

Single Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal Bypass Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in Management of Morbid Obese Patients: A Comparative Study

Not Yet Recruiting

All 3 trials loaded

Drug Details

Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Total Trials
3