Ventilation Perfusion Mismatch
13
4
4
6
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 13 trials
100.0%
+13.4% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
17%
1 of 6 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.6%
Based on 6 completed trials
Clinical Trials (13)
Vascular ARDS Recruitment After Inhaled Nitric Oxide
Ventilator Pressure and Optimization of Compliance and Hemodynamics
Positional Effects on Lung Ventilation and Perfusion in Obesity
Evaluate the Effect of Prone Ventilation on Ventilated-blood Flow Ratio in Patients With ARDS by EIT
Nebulised Heparin to Reduce COVID-19 Induced Acute Lung Injury
Change in the Phase III Slope of the Volumetric Capnography by Prone Positioning in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
68Ga PET/CT Versus 99mTc SPECT/CT for Lung Perfusion and Ventilation Scintigraphy; a Technical and Practical Feasibility Study
Post-hoc Analysis of Regional Pulmonary Perfusion and Hemodynamic Parameters Measured by Electrical Impedance Tomography
Arterial and End-Tidal CO2 Gradient as a Mortality Predictor in Critical Care Patients
Prone Position Improves End-Expiratory Lung Volumes in COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Comparison of Extra Vascular Lung Water Index in Covid-19 ARDS and "Typical"ARDS Patients
Effect of Alveolar Minute Ventilation on Respiratory Gas Heat Content
Effect of Patient Position on Arterial, End-tidal and Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide