Ventilation Perfusion Mismatch
13
3
3
6
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 13 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
17%
1 of 6 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 6 completed trials
Clinical Trials (13)
Positional Effects on Lung Ventilation and Perfusion in Obesity
Evaluate the Effect of Prone Ventilation on Ventilated-blood Flow Ratio in Patients With ARDS by EIT
Ventilator Pressure and Optimization of Compliance and Hemodynamics
Vascular ARDS Recruitment After Inhaled Nitric Oxide
Nebulised Heparin to Reduce COVID-19 Induced Acute Lung Injury
Change in the Phase III Slope of the Volumetric Capnography by Prone Positioning in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
68Ga PET/CT Versus 99mTc SPECT/CT for Lung Perfusion and Ventilation Scintigraphy; a Technical and Practical Feasibility Study
Post-hoc Analysis of Regional Pulmonary Perfusion and Hemodynamic Parameters Measured by Electrical Impedance Tomography
Arterial and End-Tidal CO2 Gradient as a Mortality Predictor in Critical Care Patients
Prone Position Improves End-Expiratory Lung Volumes in COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Comparison of Extra Vascular Lung Water Index in Covid-19 ARDS and "Typical"ARDS Patients
Effect of Alveolar Minute Ventilation on Respiratory Gas Heat Content
Effect of Patient Position on Arterial, End-tidal and Transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide