The Role of Simulation Fidelity in Early Surgical Skills Education
STITCHING
STITCHING
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
131
1 country
3
Study Start
May 20, 2025
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
November 14, 2025
Actual (reported)Study Completion
November 14, 2025
Actual (reported)The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of teaching surgical suturing techniques using various materials (e.g., banana peel, orange peel, pork, chicken, and silicone pads). The study results will help identify the most effective teaching materials and methods, which will contribute to optimizing educational programs and improving the quality of training for future surgeons.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
November 14, 2025
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
May 20, 2025
Actual (reported)November 14, 2025
Actual (reported)November 14, 2025
Actual (reported)October 9, 2026
Actual (reported)October 27, 2026
Actual (reported)Trainee-reported outcomes
Immediately after practice, trainees complete a questionnaire rating the training material and the learning experience. Four items are measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1-5): material comfort/usability, perceived realism (similarity to human skin), perceived understanding of basic suturing principles, and perceived development of practical skills. Additionally, trainees rate their confidence in placing sutures on a 0-10 numeric scale.
1 day
Expert-rated technical outcomes
Experienced surgeons evaluate students' sutures across multiple domains, each scored on a 1-5 scale (1 = worst, 5 = best). For students who do not complete the task, a score of "0" is recorded, and the result is excluded from the qualitative analysis. Technical endpoints are analysed separately for simple interrupted domains, vertical mattress domains, and global composite scores, defined as the mean across available domains within a suture type. Composite scores will first be calculated at the participant level as the mean across available domains. Group-level summaries will be presented as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR) due to the non-normal distribution of scores.
Medical students with no prior suturing experience and no known allergies to the materials used who are willing to participate in suturing on porcine skin, banana, chicken, or orange in Round 1, then on silicone model in Round 2.
Medical students with no prior suturing experience and no known allergies to the materials used who are willing to participate in suturing on a silicone model in Round 1, then on a silicone model in Round 2.
Medical students with no prior formal experience in surgical suturing are randomly assigned to practice on one of five training materials using computer-generated randomisation: silicone pad, porcine skin, chicken tissue, banana peel or orange peel (study arm). All participants attend a lecture led by an experienced surgeon (academic teacher). After this, in Round 1, they practise suturing using a standardised protocol, supervised by experienced surgeons (four per group). In Round 2, trainees from all groups (silicone, porcine, chicken, banana, and orange) perform suturing on silicone pads (standardised material exposure, control arm). A pre-specified random subsample from each Round 1 arm are invited to Round 2 due to logistical constraints; selection is not performance-based. Consequently, if Round 2 has a smaller sample size than Round 1, and paired analyses of Round 1 and Round 2 would be performed only for participants with data available at both time points.
Department of General and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, 22 Kopcińskiego St., 90-153 Łódź
Lodz, PL, 90-153, Poland
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Lodz
Lodz, PL, Poland
Department of Vascular, General, and Transplant Surgery, Wrocław Medical University
Wroclaw, PL, Poland
131 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
October 9, 2026
First Posted
October 27, 2026
Study Start
May 20, 2025
Actual (reported)Feedback Given by an Automatic and Objective System in Simulated Colonoscopy Increase Learning and Time Spent Practicing
1 day
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
November 14, 2025
Actual (reported)Study Completion
November 14, 2025
Actual (reported)Last Updated
October 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-10
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: