Evaluation of the Agreement Between Automated Program-Operated Phoropter Subjective Refraction and Optometrist-Performed Subjective Refraction
1 other identifier
interventional
508
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate the performance of an automated subjective refraction system that operates a digital phoropter. By comparing its results with those obtained through conventional subjective refraction performed by an optometrist, the study will assess the agreement in refractive prescriptions and examine examination efficiency, repeatability, and participant experience, thereby providing evidence for the further application of automated subjective refraction technology.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 11, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 23, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2027
October 23, 2026
September 1, 2026
2 months
October 11, 2026
October 17, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Agreement in refractive prescriptions between automated and optometrist-performed subjective refraction
Agreement between automated subjective refraction and optometrist-performed subjective refraction will be evaluated using measurements from the right eye as the primary analysis eye. The paired differences in spherical power and cylindrical power, measured in diopters (D), and cylinder axis, measured in degrees, will be analyzed using Bland-Altman analysis to estimate the mean difference (bias) and 95% limits of agreement. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) will also be calculated. The prespecified clinically acceptable limits are ±0.25 D for spherical and cylindrical power and ±5 degrees for cylinder axis.
Day 1, after completion of both subjective refraction examinations.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Examination time for each subjective refraction method
Day 1, during each subjective refraction examination.
Repeatability of the automated subjective refraction system
Day 1, after completion of both automated subjective refraction measurements
Agreement between the two subjective refraction methods under cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic conditions
Day 1, after completion of both subjective refraction examinations.
Participant acceptance, comfort, and satisfaction with the automated refraction procedure
Day 1, immediately after completion of both subjective refraction examinations.
Study Arms (2)
Automated Refraction First
EXPERIMENTALParticipants first undergo subjective refraction using the automated program-controlled refraction system, followed by a rest interval of at least 20 minutes and then subjective refraction performed by an optometrist. Pediatric participants undergo cycloplegia before both examinations. The first 50 adult participants undergo an additional automated refraction examination for repeatability assessment.
Optometrist Refraction First
EXPERIMENTALParticipants first undergo subjective refraction performed by an optometrist, followed by a rest interval of at least 20 minutes and then subjective refraction using the automated program-controlled refraction system. Pediatric participants undergo cycloplegia before both examinations. The first 50 adult participants undergo an additional automated refraction examination for repeatability assessment.
Interventions
Subjective refraction is performed using an automated program operating a standard phoropter to determine sphere, cylinder, and axis. The system incorporates an in-house AI algorithm that has not been registered as a medical device. Its results are used for research purposes only and do not guide spectacle prescription or other clinical decisions. The first 50 adult participants undergo a second automated measurement for repeatability assessment.
Subjective refraction is independently performed by a qualified optometrist according to a standardized operating procedure to determine sphere, cylinder, and axis. The optometrist is unaware of the results generated by the automated refraction system when performing the examination.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children aged 7-16 years or adults aged 18 years or older, of either sex.
- Astigmatism magnitude of 1.50 D or less. ③ Children must be able to undergo cycloplegia. ④ Voluntary participation in the study with written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Concomitant ocular diseases causing opacity of the ocular media, such as cataract, glaucoma, or fundus disease.
- History of ocular trauma or intraocular surgery.
- Manifest strabismus or significant binocular vision dysfunction.
- Inability to follow and respond to system instructions. ⑤ Only one eye meeting the eligibility criteria.
- Considered unsuitable for participation by the investigator.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 11, 2026
First Posted
October 23, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 28, 2027
Last Updated
October 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No external sharing of individual participant data is currently planned.