NCT06379477

Brief Summary

A refractive surprise can be defined as the failure to achieve the intended postoperative refractive target or the presentation of unexpected and, unwanted post-operative refractive error. It can cause anisometropia or dominance switch and is a source of patient dissatisfaction due to unmet expectations.The best way to manage refractive surprise is to prevent it. The 2017 NICE guidelines on the management of cataracts provide advice on prevention of refractive surprise through accurate biometry, A-constant optimisation, intraocular lens (IOL) formula selection and avoiding wrong lens implant errors.Benchmark standards for NHS cataract surgery dictate that 85% of eyes should be within 1 dioptre (D) and 55% within 0.5D of target spherical equivalent refraction following surgery.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
63

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2024

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 22, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 23, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2024

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 31, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

April 23, 2024

Status Verified

April 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

March 22, 2024

Last Update Submit

April 22, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

refractive error surprises

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Diagnosis and treatment of the resulting refractive error surprises

    Rate of refractive error surprises

    Baseline

Study Arms (3)

Corneal refractive surgery

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Among patients scheduled for cataract surgery, Group I; will undergo Corneal refractive surgery to correct any post-operative refractive surprises.

Procedure: Refractive surgeries

IOL exchange

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Among patients scheduled for cataract surgery, Group II; will undergo IOL exchange to correct any post-operative refractive surprises.

Procedure: Refractive surgeries

Piggyback sulcus IOL

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Among patients scheduled for cataract surgery, Group III; will undergo Piggyback sulcus IOL to correct any post-operative refractive surprises.

Procedure: Refractive surgeries

Interventions

after primary phacoemulsification surgery any resulting refractive error surprises will be corrected with different refractive surgery options

Corneal refractive surgeryIOL exchangePiggyback sulcus IOL

Eligibility Criteria

Age55 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All adult patients scheduled for cataract surgery with:
  • Symptomatizing patients with postoperative spherical error of more than 1 diopters.
  • Symptomatizing patients with postoperative cylindrical error of more than 1 diopters.
  • Symptomatizing patients with uncorrected distant visual acuity less than 6/24
  • Symptomatizing patients with corrected distant visual acuity of less than 6/12
  • Clear cornea. 6. Uneventful surgery.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with complicated cataract.
  • Raised intraocular pressure (IOP).
  • Patients with pathologies of the posterior segment of the eye.
  • Other causes of diminution of vision.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (7)

  • Abdelghany AA, Alio JL. Surgical options for correction of refractive error following cataract surgery. Eye Vis (Lond). 2014 Oct 16;1:2. doi: 10.1186/s40662-014-0002-2. eCollection 2014.

    PMID: 26605349BACKGROUND
  • Day AC, Donachie PH, Sparrow JM, Johnston RL; Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists' National Ophthalmology Database study of cataract surgery: report 1, visual outcomes and complications. Eye (Lond). 2015 Apr;29(4):552-60. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.3. Epub 2015 Feb 13.

  • Gale RP, Saldana M, Johnston RL, Zuberbuhler B, McKibbin M. Benchmark standards for refractive outcomes after NHS cataract surgery. Eye (Lond). 2009 Jan;23(1):149-52. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702954. Epub 2007 Aug 24.

  • Khoramnia R, Auffarth G, Labuz G, Pettit G, Suryakumar R. Refractive Outcomes after Cataract Surgery. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jan 19;12(2):243. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020243.

  • Moshirfar M, Thomson AC, Thomson RJ, Martheswaran T, McCabe SE. Refractive enhancements for residual refractive error after cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan;32(1):54-61. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000717.

  • Ladas JG, Stark WJ. Improving cataract surgery refractive outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2011 Sep;118(9):1699-700. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.05.038. No abstract available.

  • Iwase T, Tanaka N, Sugiyama K. Postoperative refraction changes in phacoemulsification cataract surgery with implantation of different types of intraocular lens. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2008 May-Jun;18(3):371-6. doi: 10.1177/112067210801800310.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Refractive Errors

Interventions

Refractive Surgical Procedures

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Eye Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ophthalmologic Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • Magdy M Mostafa, MD

    Assiut University

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Mohamed S Hussien, MD

    Assiut University

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Ali N Ryad, MD

    Assiut University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Abdelrahman M Saad, MSC

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
ophthalmology specialist at ophthalmology department Assiut University hospital

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2024

First Posted

April 23, 2024

Study Start

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion

May 31, 2025

Study Completion

June 30, 2025

Last Updated

April 23, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-04