NCT07886762

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial was to compare two ways of placing and restoring dental implants in adults missing one or more back teeth. The main question it aimed to answer was: does a bone-level implant placed 2 mm below the bone crest, with a final abutment that is never removed, preserve more of the bone around the implant than a tissue-level implant placed at the level of the bone crest? Each implant was randomly assigned by coin toss to one of the two treatments. Researchers measured the bone level around the implants on dental X-rays at crown placement, 6 months after loading, and at a final visit 12 to 24 months after loading. They also measured two markers of inflammation (IL-1β and MMP-8) in the fluid around the implants 6 months after loading.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 2, 2022

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 6, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 6, 2024

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 14, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 21, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

October 21, 2026

Status Verified

October 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

October 14, 2026

Last Update Submit

October 14, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

bone-level implanttissue-level implantsubcrestal placementmarginal bone lossone-abutment one-timeplatform switchingperi-implant crevicular fluidIL-1 betaMMP-8

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change From Baseline in Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Level at Final Follow-up

    Vertical distance (mm) from the bone crest to the first implant thread, measured at the mesial and distal sites on standardized periapical radiographs (long-cone paralleling technique) with calibrated ImageJ software by two blinded examiners. Change is calculated as the baseline value minus the follow-up value; positive values indicate bone loss.

    Baseline (prosthesis delivery), 6 months after loading, and final follow-up (12 to 24 months after loading)

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Interleukin-1β Concentration in Peri-Implant Crevicular Fluid

    12 months after loading

  • Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 Concentration in Peri-Implant Crevicular Fluid

    12 months after loading

Study Arms (2)

Tissue-level implant, crestal placement

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Klockner Essential Cone tissue-level implants (1.5 mm machined transmucosal collar, conical connection) placed with the treated surface at the crestal level and restored with monolithic zirconia single crowns.

Device: issue-level implant placed at crestal level (Klockner Essential Cone)

Bone-level implant, 2 mm subcrestal placement

EXPERIMENTAL

Klockner Vega bone-level implants (internal hexagon with 10° conical interface and platform switching) placed 2 mm subcrestally. A definitive 2 mm transepithelial abutment was connected 2 months after surgery and was never removed (one-abutment-one-time protocol). Restored with monolithic zirconia single crowns.

Device: Bone-level implant placed 2 mm subcrestally with one-abutment-one-time protocol (Klockner Vega)

Interventions

Tissue-level dental implant with a 1.5 mm machined transmucosal collar and conical connection, placed with the treated surface at the level of the bone crest after flap elevation.

Tissue-level implant, crestal placement

Bone-level dental implant with an internal hexagonal connection, 10° conical interface and platform switching, placed 2 mm below the bone crest. A definitive 2 mm transepithelial abutment was connected 2 months after surgery and never removed.

Bone-level implant, 2 mm subcrestal placement

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults in good general health
  • Missing one or more back teeth that can be replaced with a dental implant
  • Healthy gums, with no active gum disease
  • Good oral hygiene (plaque and gum bleeding scores below 20%)
  • Enough jawbone to place an implant at least 4 mm wide and 8 mm long, with at least 1.5 mm of bone around the implant, as confirmed by a 3D dental scan (CBCT)

You may not qualify if:

  • Smoking
  • Uncontrolled diabetes
  • Treatment with intravenous bisphosphonates (bone-strengthening drugs given by injection)
  • Weakened immune system or treatment with immunosuppressive drugs
  • Active cancer
  • Previous radiotherapy to the head or neck
  • Pregnancy
  • Untreated gum disease (periodontitis)
  • Insufficient jawbone quality or quantity

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Clinica Dental MD

Bilbao, Bizkaia, 48012, Spain

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Alveolar Bone Loss

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bone ResorptionBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesPeriodontal AtrophyPeriodontal DiseasesMouth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The two radiographic outcome assessors and the laboratory staff who performed the ELISA analyses were blinded to group allocation. The surgeon was aware of the allocation, as the implant type was assigned at the surgical planning stage, and blinding of the care provider was not possible because the implants differ visibly in design and placement depth.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Parallel-group design with randomization at the implant level (coin toss). Patients receiving more than one implant could receive implants of both configurations.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
DDS, PhD; Collaborating Professor, Master's Degree in Prostodhontics, Oral Implantology and Periodontology, Universidad Europea Miguel de Cervantes

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 14, 2026

First Posted

October 21, 2026

Study Start

May 2, 2022

Primary Completion

November 6, 2024

Study Completion

November 6, 2024

Last Updated

October 21, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-10

Locations