NCT06821932

Brief Summary

Bacground: Implant failure may necessitate the need for another surgical procedure to improve implant survival. Photofunctionalization with UV is a practice that can positively affect dental implant success and osseointegration. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of the photofunctionalization process on the bone quality around the implant. Methods: In the study, 42 implants were evaluated using the Fractal Analysis method from the panoramic radiographs taken before and after the implant. The analysis of the data was done with the SPSS 26 program and worked with a 95% confidence level. In the test group, there was a statistically significant difference between the 1st panoramic measurement and the 2nd panoramic measurement (p=0.044\<0.05) and the bone fractal score increased.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
21

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 15, 2021

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 10, 2022

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 22, 2022

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 3, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 12, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

February 12, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

January 3, 2025

Last Update Submit

February 11, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

PhotofunctionalizationUltraviyolet LightDental implant

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Bone fractal analysis

    The bone fractal dimension (FB) values were determined by sizing the ROI to 25x25 pixels using the box counting method. The area of interest to be examined in the image was cropped and saved in 8-bit format. Different image processing methods were applied. For the fractal dimension calculation the box counting method was used. The number of squares containing trabeculae and the total number of squares in the image were determined for various pixel sizes. These values were plotted on a logarithmic scale, and the slope of the line that best fit the points on the graph determined the bone FB.

    1 month

Study Arms (2)

Experimental: photofunctionalized implant inserted

EXPERIMENTAL

Dental implants were subjected to the photofunctionalization process and then immediately inserted into the bone on the experimental side of the mouth

Procedure: Photofunctionalized dental implant surgery

Control: Dental implant placement without photofunctionalization process

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Dental implants were inserted in the bone on the contralateral side of the mouth without photofunctionalization

Procedure: Dental implant surgery

Interventions

Dental implants subjected to photofunctionalization were placed in the experimental area of the mouth.

Experimental: photofunctionalized implant inserted

Dental implants not subjected to photofunctionalization were placed in the bone on the contralateral side of the mouth

Control: Dental implant placement without photofunctionalization process

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Being over the age of 18
  • Having bilateral edentulous areas in the posterior mandibular region

You may not qualify if:

  • Individuals with any systemic disease,
  • Individuals using drugs that affect bone metabolism,
  • Patients with findings that could affect the study results such as bone cysts, tumors, lesions or fractures

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ankara University, Faculty of Dentistry

Ankara, Yenimahalle, 06500, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Choi B, Lee YC, Oh KC, Lee JH. Effects of photofunctionalization on early osseointegration of titanium dental implants in the maxillary posterior region: a randomized double-blinded clinical trial. Int J Implant Dent. 2021 May 10;7(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00318-x.

    PMID: 33969450BACKGROUND
  • Hirota M, Ozawa T, Iwai T, Ogawa T, Tohnai I. Effect of Photofunctionalization on Early Implant Failure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Sep/Oct;33(5):1098-1102. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6541.

    PMID: 30231097BACKGROUND
  • Farsiani H, Bagis N, Balkan EP, Karacaoglu F, Guner ZD, Orhan K. Evaluation of the bone structure surrounding photofunctionalized implants using the fractal analysis method: a split-mouth randomized clinical study. BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):964. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06330-6.

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Splith mouth
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assoc. Prof.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2025

First Posted

February 12, 2025

Study Start

May 15, 2021

Primary Completion

June 10, 2022

Study Completion

October 22, 2022

Last Updated

February 12, 2025

Record last verified: 2021-04

Locations