Comparison of Two Versus Four Weeks of Ureteral Stenting Prior to Ureteroscopy After Failed Primary Ureteral Access
1 other identifier
interventional
198
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study proposes a non-randomized controlled trial comparing 2 weeks versus 4 weeks of DJ ureteral stenting in patients whose primary ureteral access failed during an initial attempt at FURS. The purpose is to determine whether a longer stenting period improves subsequent ureteral access. Participants: Adults aged 18-65 years with renal/upper ureteric stones ≤20 mm and failed primary access. Sample size: 198 patients - 99 in each group. Group A: Repeat FURS after 2 weeks of DJ stenting. Group B: Repeat FURS after 4 weeks of DJ stenting. Primary outcome: Successful placement of a 10/12-Fr ureteral access sheath during repeat FURS without additional dilation. Secondary outcomes: Stone-free rate and USSQ score. Stone-free definition: No residual stone fragment ≥4 mm on NCCT at 4 weeks after FURS. Analysis: t-test/Mann-Whitney U for numerical variables and Chi-square/Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, with p \< 0.05 considered significant.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 4, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 9, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2027
October 9, 2026
October 1, 2026
6 months
October 4, 2026
October 7, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Successful ureteral access during repeat flexible ureteroscopy
Successful ureteral access will be defined as successful advancement and placement of a predetermined 10/12-Fr ureteral access sheath during repeat flexible ureteroscopy without requiring additional preoperative ureteral dilatation or abandoning the procedure. The outcome will be recorded as Yes/No.
At repeat flexible ureteroscopy, approximately 2 or 4 weeks after initial failed ureteral access.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) score
At repeat FURS, approximately 2 or 4 weeks after DJ stent placement
Study Arms (2)
2-Week Stenting Group
EXPERIMENTALPatients with failed primary ureteral access who undergo repeat flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) after approximately two weeks of preoperative DJ ureteral stenting.
4-Week Stenting Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients with failed primary ureteral access who undergo repeat flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) after approximately four weeks of preoperative DJ ureteral stenting.
Interventions
Placement of a double-J (DJ) ureteral stent following failed primary ureteral access to allow passive ureteral dilatation before repeat flexible ureteroscopy. The duration of preoperative stenting will be approximately two weeks in Group 1 and four weeks in Group 2.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 18-65 years of either gender presenting with renal and/or upper ureteric calculi ≤20 mm requiring flexible ureteroscopy (FURS).
- Patients in whom primary ureteral access has failed because of a tight or tortuous ureter.
- Patients in whom a DJ ureteral stent has been placed following failed primary ureteral access.
- Patients willing to undergo repeat FURS after two or four weeks of preoperative ureteral stenting.
- Patients who provide written informed consent to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with lower ureteric stones or renal/upper ureteric stones \>20 mm.
- Patients with active urinary tract infection, defined as urine culture showing ≥10⁵ CFU/mL of a pathogenic organism or body temperature ≥38°C at the time of repeat FURS.
- Patients with uncorrected coagulopathy, defined as INR \>1.5, platelet count \<50,000/µL, or aPTT \>1.5 times the laboratory upper limit of normal.
- Patients with significant renal impairment, defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<30 mL/min/1.73 m².
- Patients with a history of major ureteric surgery or ureteral reconstruction on the affected side.
- Patients requiring emergency intervention because of obstructed infected urinary tract, defined by fever ≥38°C with radiological evidence of urinary obstruction.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
PAEC General Hospital Islamabad
Islamabad, Fedral, 44000, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 4, 2026
First Posted
October 9, 2026
Study Start
October 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 31, 2027
Last Updated
October 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-10