Comparison of the Effectiveness of Midpoint Transverse Process to Pleura (MTP) Block and Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) at RS Ngoerah
MESA-VATS
A Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Midpoint Transverse Process to Pleura (MTP) Block and Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) at RS Ngoerah
2 other identifiers
interventional
51
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized, double-blind controlled trial compares two ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks, the midpoint transverse process to pleura (MTP) block and the erector spinae plane (ESP) block, for postoperative analgesia in adults undergoing elective video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) at RS Ngoerah, Denpasar, Indonesia. Both blocks are performed at the T4-T5 level after induction of general anesthesia and before skin incision, with a single injection of 20 mL ropivacaine 0.375%. Participants are randomly allocated, using block randomization and sealed opaque envelopes, to the MTP block group or the ESP block group. All participants receive the same general anesthesia, the same multimodal analgesia, and the same fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) after surgery. The primary outcome is total fentanyl consumption via PCA in the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes are numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 hours, time to first rescue analgesia, and Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at 24 hours. All outcomes are assessed by the Acute Pain Service team, who are blinded to group allocation. The study tests whether the MTP block, which places local anesthetic closer to the thoracic paravertebral space, differs from the ESP block in these outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable pain
Started Jun 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 4, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 3, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 4, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 5, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 9, 2026
CompletedOctober 9, 2026
October 1, 2026
3 months
October 5, 2026
October 5, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Total fentanyl consumption via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in the first 24 hours after surgery
Cumulative fentanyl dose delivered through the PCA pump over the first 24 hours after surgery, read from the cumulative PCA pump log at 24 hours and expressed in mcg per kg body weight. PCA settings: fentanyl 10 mcg/mL, demand only, demand dose 20 mcg, lockout interval 10 minutes, maximum 200 mcg per 4 hours, no background infusion, identical in both groups.
24 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Postoperative pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale, 0-10)
Self-reported pain intensity on the Numerical Rating Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable), obtained by guided interview by a blinded Acute Pain Service assessor.
Time to first rescue analgesia
Up to 24 hours after surgery
Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score
24 +/- 2 hours after surgery
Study Arms (2)
MTP block
EXPERIMENTALUltrasound-guided MTP block with ropivacaine 0.375% 20 mL single injection at T4-T5, performed under general anesthesia in the lateral decubitus position at least 15 minutes before incision. All participants also receive the same general anesthesia, ibuprofen 400 mg IV and paracetamol 1 g IV 30 minutes before wound closure, and postoperative fentanyl PCA (10 mcg/mL, demand dose 20 mcg, lockout 10 minutes, no background infusion).
ESP block
EXPERIMENTALUltrasound-guided ESP block with ropivacaine 0.375% 20 mL single injection at T4-T5, performed under general anesthesia in the lateral decubitus position at least 15 minutes before incision. All participants also receive the same general anesthesia, ibuprofen 400 mg IV and paracetamol 1 g IV 30 minutes before wound closure, and postoperative fentanyl PCA (10 mcg/mL, demand dose 20 mcg, lockout 10 minutes, no background infusion).
Interventions
Performed under general anesthesia in the lateral decubitus position, at least 15 minutes before surgical incision. A linear transducer (10-15 MHz) is placed parasagittally 3 cm lateral to the midline at T4-T5, and the transverse process and pleura are identified. The midpoint between the posterior edge of the transverse process and the pleura is determined. A 22G echogenic needle is advanced in-plane from cranial to caudal until the tip reaches the midpoint. After 1 mL normal saline confirms fascial separation, ropivacaine 0.375% 20 mL is injected in increments with intermittent aspiration every 5 mL. Correct placement is confirmed by fascial spread and pleural displacement on real-time ultrasound. Performed by a consultant anesthesiologist (regional analgesia).
Performed under general anesthesia in the lateral decubitus position, at least 15 minutes before surgical incision. A linear transducer (10-15 MHz) is placed parasagittally 3 cm lateral to the midline at T4-T5, and the transverse process and the erector spinae muscle are identified. A 22G echogenic needle is advanced in-plane from caudal to cranial until the tip lies beneath the erector spinae muscle, just above the surface of the transverse process. A 1 mL normal saline injection produces the lift sign (erector spinae muscle lifted off the transverse process), then ropivacaine 0.375% 20 mL is injected gradually. Performed by a consultant anesthesiologist (regional analgesia).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients scheduled for elective video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) at RS Ngoerah
- Age 18-65 years
- ASA physical status I-III
- Body mass index 18-30 kg/m2
- Able to communicate well in Indonesian, understand the use of the Numerical Rating Scale, and complete the QoR-15 questionnaire
- Willing to participate and has signed written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindication to regional anesthesia
- Allergy to the drugs used (ropivacaine, fentanyl, paracetamol and/or ibuprofen)
- Chronic chest pain for more than 2 months before surgery
- Unable to be assessed with the Numerical Rating Scale and unable to operate the PCA device
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
RS Ngoerah
Denpasar, Bali, 80113, Indonesia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Tjokorda Gde Agung Senapathi, Professor
Udayana University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Putu Herdita Sudiantara, Sp.An-TI
Udayana University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants receive the block after induction of general anesthesia and are unaware of the block type. All outcomes are assessed by the Acute Pain Service team, who are blinded to allocation. The block operator (consultant anesthesiologist) opens the sealed opaque randomization envelope and performs the block according to allocation, but does not assess outcomes. The block operator is not masked.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident Physician, Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 5, 2026
First Posted
October 9, 2026
Study Start
June 4, 2026
Primary Completion
September 3, 2026
Study Completion
October 4, 2026
Last Updated
October 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared with other researchers. The written informed consent given to participants states that their identity and medical data are kept confidential and can only be accessed by the research team and authorized parties for ethics audit. Aggregate results will be reported in the thesis and publications without participant identities.