NCT07867015

Brief Summary

Upper extremity weakness, impaired coordination, reduced dexterity, and limited arm and hand use may continue after TBI. Repetitive, task-specific rehabilitation may improve function, but recovery can remain incomplete. taVNS is a non-invasive form of electrical stimulation delivered to part of the outer ear. The stimulation is intended to activate nerve pathways involved in learning and brain plasticity while you practice upper extremity tasks. This pilot study will evaluate safety, tolerability, feasibility, and preliminary effects on upper extremity function and cognition. Up to 40 people will take part at Craig Hospital.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
18mo left

Started Nov 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 2, 2026

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 9, 2026

Completed
23 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2026

Expected
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2027

6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2028

Last Updated

October 9, 2026

Status Verified

October 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

October 2, 2026

Last Update Submit

October 2, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulationFunctional task-specific practiceTraumatic brain injuryUpper extremity function

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Safety of intervention

    Number, type, severity, study-relatedness, action taken, and outcome of adverse events.

    From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

  • Tolerability of intervention

    Stimulation-related discomfort using a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale during sessions; reasons for pauses or discontinuation.

    From enrollment to end of treatment at 4 weeks

  • Feasibility of intervention

    Recruitment, retention, session attendance, proportion completing at least 80% of sessions, dropout attributable to taVNS, and protocol deviations.

    From enrollment to end of treatment at 4 weeks

  • Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)

    A standardized clinical assessment used to evaluate motor impairment and recovery of the arm and hand following neurological injury. The upper extremity portion assesses movement, coordination, reflex activity, and hand function. During the assessment, participants are asked to perform a series of arm, wrist, and hand movements while a trained examiner observes and scores performance. Tasks include movements such as shoulder elevation, elbow flexion and extension, wrist motion, grasping objects, and finger movements. Scores are based on the participant's ability to successfully complete each movement. The assessment is commonly used in rehabilitation research to quantify upper extremity motor impairment and recovery. Administration typically requires approximately 20-30 minutes.

    Baseline and 4 weeks

  • Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)

    A standardized assessment of upper extremity functional ability. It evaluates a participant's capacity to perform tasks involving grasp, grip, pinch, and gross arm movement. Participants are asked to manipulate a variety of commonly used objects of different sizes, shapes, and weights, such as blocks, balls, and tubes. Tasks include picking up, moving, and placing objects as well as performing gross reaching movements. Performance is scored according to the participant's ability to complete each task within specified time limits. The ARAT provides an objective measure of upper extremity functional performance and is widely used in neurological rehabilitation research. Administration typically requires approximately 10-20 minutes.

    Baseline and 4 weeks

  • Box and Block Test (BBT)

    A standardized measure of manual dexterity and gross hand function. During the test, participants sit in front of a box divided into two compartments containing small wooden blocks. Participants are instructed to move as many blocks as possible, one at a time, from one compartment to the other using one hand during a 60-second period. The test is completed separately for each hand. The primary outcome is the number of blocks successfully transferred within the allotted time. The BBT is commonly used to assess hand dexterity and upper extremity function in individuals with neurological and musculoskeletal conditions. Administration typically requires approximately 5 minutes.

    Baseline and 4 weeks

  • Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    A patient-reported outcome measure used to assess an individual's perceived change in upper extremity function following treatment. At the post-treatment assessment, participants will be asked to rate how their arm and hand function has changed since the start of the study using a 7-point scale. Response options range from "very much worse" to "very much improved." The PGIC captures the participant's overall perception of meaningful functional change and complements objective clinical measures of upper extremity performance. The assessment consists of a single question, requires approximately 1 minute to complete, and poses minimal risk to participants.

    End of treatment at 4 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Brief Assessment of Cognition and Treatment (BTACT)

    Baseline and 4 weeks

  • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)

    Baseline and 4 weeks

  • Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)

    Baseline and 4 weeks

  • Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18)

    Baseline and 4 weeks

  • DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure (Adult)

    Baseline and 4 weeks

Study Arms (2)

taVNS + FTP

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants assigned to active taVNS will perform upper extremity FTP while receiving stimulation through an earbud electrode positioned on the auricular concha. Current intensity will be individually adjusted to a tolerable level. Stimulation may be reduced, paused, or stopped for discomfort or safety concerns.

Device: taVNS + FTP

sham taVNS + FTP

SHAM COMPARATOR

Participants assigned to sham taVNS will complete the identical rehabilitation schedule and activities using identical device placement at the left auricular concha; however, no active stimulation will be delivered. Device setup and study interactions will otherwise be kept as similar as practical between groups.

Other: FTP + sham taVNS

Interventions

Both groups will receive the same structured upper extremity rehabilitation program. Each 60-minute session will include approximately 40 minutes of upper extremity FTP and 10 minutes of functional carryover activities in a real-world or simulated context, with remaining time used for setup, monitoring, and transition. Training will target gross upper extremity movement, bilateral pinch, bilateral grasp, unilateral grasp, complex or unilateral pinch, and finger isolation. Progression may include increased repetitions or speed, resistance, reduced therapist assistance, and varied task contexts using common objects. Participants assigned to active taVNS will perform upper extremity FTP while receiving stimulation through an earbud electrode positioned on the auricular concha. Current intensity will be individually adjusted to a tolerable level. Stimulation may be reduced, paused, or stopped for discomfort or safety concerns.

taVNS + FTP

Both groups will receive the same structured upper extremity rehabilitation program. Each 60-minute session will include approximately 40 minutes of upper extremity FTP and 10 minutes of functional carryover activities in a real-world or simulated context, with remaining time used for setup, monitoring, and transition. Training will target gross upper extremity movement, bilateral pinch, bilateral grasp, unilateral grasp, complex or unilateral pinch, and finger isolation. Progression may include increased repetitions or speed, resistance, reduced therapist assistance, and varied task contexts using common objects. Participants assigned to sham taVNS will complete the identical rehabilitation schedule and activities using identical device placement at the left auricular concha; however, no active stimulation will be delivered. Device setup and study interactions will otherwise be kept as similar as practical between groups.

sham taVNS + FTP

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • History of TBI requiring inpatient rehabilitation, with resulting upper extremity impairment in at least one limb
  • Passive range of motion within functional limits at the wrists, shoulders, and elbows.
  • Able to attend on-site training at Craig Hospital three times per week for four weeks.
  • No complicating physical or cognitive condition, as determined by the physician or study investigator, that would preclude safe use of taVNS.
  • If taking prescribed antispasticity medication, dose stable for at least four weeks before study procedures.
  • Able to provide informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Recent fracture or contracture that could interfere with the intervention.
  • Botulinum toxin injections to the upper extremity or hand within the previous three months.
  • Pregnant, planning pregnancy, or breastfeeding.
  • Concurrent participation in another drug or device trial that may interfere with this study.
  • Implanted pacemaker, spinal cord stimulator, ventriculoperitoneal shunt, deep brain stimulator, or intrathecal pump.
  • Any condition or circumstance that, in the investigator's judgment, makes participation unsafe or inappropriate.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Craig Hospital

Englewood, Colorado, 80113, United States

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Stephens J, Hays K, Winden H, Busch B, Tefertiller C. Assessing Task-Dependent Neurophysiology During Virtual Reality Treadmill Training in Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Feasibility Study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2026 Jan-Feb 01;41(1):E59-E67. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000001057. Epub 2025 Dec 29.

    PMID: 40203004BACKGROUND
  • DiBlasio CA, Novack TA, Cook EW 3rd, Dams-O'Connor K, Kennedy RE. Convergent Validity of In-Person Assessment of Inpatients With Traumatic Brain Injury Using the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT). J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2021 Jul-Aug 01;36(4):E226-E232. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000677.

    PMID: 33656489BACKGROUND
  • Wang L, Gao F, Dai Y, Wang Z, Liang F, Wu J, Wang M, Wang L. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on upper limb motor function with stroke: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy pilot study. Front Neurosci. 2023 Nov 21;17:1297887. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1297887. eCollection 2023.

    PMID: 38075278BACKGROUND
  • Yan L, Qian Y, Li H. Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Combined with Rehabilitation Training in the Intervention of Upper Limb Movement Disorders After Stroke: A Systematic Review. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2022 Sep 16;18:2095-2106. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S376399. eCollection 2022.

    PMID: 36147448BACKGROUND
  • Wu D, Ma J, Zhang L, Wang S, Tan B, Jia G. Effect and Safety of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Recovery of Upper Limb Motor Function in Subacute Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Randomized Pilot Study. Neural Plast. 2020 Aug 1;2020:8841752. doi: 10.1155/2020/8841752. eCollection 2020.

    PMID: 32802039BACKGROUND
  • Frangos E, Ellrich J, Komisaruk BR. Non-invasive Access to the Vagus Nerve Central Projections via Electrical Stimulation of the External Ear: fMRI Evidence in Humans. Brain Stimul. 2015 May-Jun;8(3):624-36. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.11.018. Epub 2014 Dec 6.

    PMID: 25573069BACKGROUND
  • Yakunina N, Kim SS, Nam EC. Optimization of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Using Functional MRI. Neuromodulation. 2017 Apr;20(3):290-300. doi: 10.1111/ner.12541. Epub 2016 Nov 29.

    PMID: 27898202BACKGROUND
  • Redgrave JN, Moore L, Oyekunle T, Ebrahim M, Falidas K, Snowdon N, Ali A, Majid A. Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation with Concurrent Upper Limb Repetitive Task Practice for Poststroke Motor Recovery: A Pilot Study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Jul;27(7):1998-2005. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.02.056. Epub 2018 Mar 23.

    PMID: 29580658BACKGROUND
  • Redgrave J, Day D, Leung H, Laud PJ, Ali A, Lindert R, Majid A. Safety and tolerability of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve stimulation in humans; a systematic review. Brain Stimul. 2018 Nov-Dec;11(6):1225-1238. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 23.

    PMID: 30217648BACKGROUND
  • Dawson J, Liu CY, Francisco GE, Cramer SC, Wolf SL, Dixit A, Alexander J, Ali R, Brown BL, Feng W, DeMark L, Hochberg LR, Kautz SA, Majid A, O'Dell MW, Pierce D, Prudente CN, Redgrave J, Turner DL, Engineer ND, Kimberley TJ. Vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation for upper limb motor function after ischaemic stroke (VNS-REHAB): a randomised, blinded, pivotal, device trial. Lancet. 2021 Apr 24;397(10284):1545-1553. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00475-X.

    PMID: 33894832BACKGROUND
  • Bayona NA, Bitensky J, Salter K, Teasell R. The role of task-specific training in rehabilitation therapies. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2005 Summer;12(3):58-65. doi: 10.1310/BQM5-6YGB-MVJ5-WVCR.

    PMID: 16110428BACKGROUND
  • Subramanian SK, Fountain MK, Hood AF, Verduzco-Gutierrez M. Upper Limb Motor Improvement after Traumatic Brain Injury: Systematic Review of Interventions. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022 Jan;36(1):17-37. doi: 10.1177/15459683211056662. Epub 2021 Nov 12.

    PMID: 34766518BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Brain Injuries, Traumatic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain InjuriesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesCraniocerebral TraumaTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and Injuries

Central Study Contacts

Candy Tefertiller, PT, DPT, PhD, NCS

CONTACT

Mackenzie Peckham, MPH

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This is a single-site, pilot, randomized, sham-controlled, assessor-masked trial. Up to 40 participants will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to active taVNS plus FTP or sham taVNS plus FTP.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 2, 2026

First Posted

October 9, 2026

Study Start (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2028

Last Updated

October 9, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-10

Locations