NCT07853196

Brief Summary

This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the effects of a hyaluronic acid complex and dexamethasone on postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus following mandibular third molar surgery, compared with a control group. Participants were evaluated in three groups: a hyaluronic acid complex group, a dexamethasone group, and a control group. Postoperative pain, facial swelling, and limitation of mouth opening were assessed during the postoperative follow-up period to compare postoperative outcomes among the groups.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
45

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 5, 2026

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 25, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 25, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 26, 2026

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

October 1, 2026

Status Verified

September 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

September 26, 2026

Last Update Submit

September 26, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Mandibular Third Molar Surgery Hyaluronic Acid Dexamethasone Postoperative Pain Facial Swelling Trismus

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Postoperative Pain Assessed Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Postoperative pain was assessed using a patient-reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicated unbearable/worst pain. Participants indicated their perceived pain intensity on the scale. No preoperative VAS measurement was performed

    Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7

  • Facial Swelling Assessed Using Facial Measurements

    Facial swelling was assessed in millimeters (mm) using a flexible measuring tape. Three anatomical distances were measured: tragus to labial commissure, tragus to pogonion, and mandibular angle to lateral canthus. The arithmetic mean of the three measurements was calculated for each participant. Postoperative percentage change from the preoperative baseline was calculated as \[(postoperative mean - preoperative mean) / \|preoperative mean\|\] × 100. Positive values indicated an increase in facial measurements.

    Preoperatively and on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7

  • Trismus Assessed by Maximum Interincisal Mouth Opening

    Trismus was assessed by measuring maximum interincisal mouth opening in millimeters (mm) using a digital caliper. The distance between the incisal edges of the maxillary and mandibular central incisors was measured once at each assessment. Postoperative percentage change from the preoperative baseline was calculated as \[(postoperative value - preoperative value) / \|preoperative value\|\] × 100. Negative values indicated a reduction in maximum mouth opening.

    Preoperatively and on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7

Study Arms (3)

Control Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Following mandibular third molar extraction, SPONGOSTAN™ Dental absorbable hemostatic gelatin sponge (MS0005; 1 × 1 × 1 cm; Ethicon, Johnson \& Johnson) was placed into the extraction socket. No hyaluronic acid complex or dexamethasone was administered. The surgical site was primarily closed with 3/0 silk sutures, which were removed on postoperative day 7.

Device: Absorbable Hemostatic Gelatin Sponge (SPONGOSTAN™ Dental)

Hyaluronic Acid Complex Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Following mandibular third molar extraction, 0.2 mL of Monovisc® (22 mg/mL cross-linked high-molecular-weight sodium hyaluronate; Anika Therapeutics, Inc., Bedford, MA, USA), corresponding to 4.4 mg of sodium hyaluronate, was applied directly into the extraction socket. SPONGOSTAN™ Dental was subsequently placed to enhance retention within the socket. The surgical site was primarily closed with 3/0 silk sutures, which were removed on postoperative day 7.

Drug: Hyaluronic Acid ComplexDevice: Absorbable Hemostatic Gelatin Sponge (SPONGOSTAN™ Dental)

Dexamethasone Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Following mandibular third molar extraction, 1.5 mL of DEKORT® 8 mg/2 mL I.M./I.V. solution for injection (DEVA Holding A.Ş., Türkiye), corresponding to 6 mg of dexamethasone, was absorbed into SPONGOSTAN™ Dental and placed into the extraction socket. The surgical site was primarily closed with 3/0 silk sutures, which were removed on postoperative day 7.

Drug: DexamethasoneDevice: Absorbable Hemostatic Gelatin Sponge (SPONGOSTAN™ Dental)

Interventions

Monovisc® (Anika Therapeutics, Inc., Bedford, MA, USA), containing 22 mg/mL cross-linked, high-molecular-weight sodium hyaluronate, was used. A 0.2 mL volume of the preparation (equivalent to 4.4 mg sodium hyaluronate) was applied directly into the extraction socket using a sterile applicator. SPONGOSTAN™ Dental absorbable hemostatic gelatin sponge was subsequently placed into the socket to enhance retention of the preparation.

Hyaluronic Acid Complex Group

DEKORT® 8 mg/2 mL solution for I.M./I.V. injection (DEVA Holding A.Ş., Türkiye) was used. A 1.5 mL volume of the solution, corresponding to 6 mg dexamethasone, was absorbed into a SPONGOSTAN™ Dental absorbable hemostatic gelatin sponge and placed directly into the extraction socket.

Dexamethasone Group

SPONGOSTAN™ Dental absorbable hemostatic gelatin sponge (MS0005; 1 × 1 × 1 cm; Ethicon, Johnson \& Johnson) was placed directly into the extraction socket. In the control group, the gelatin sponge was used without hyaluronic acid or dexamethasone.

Control GroupDexamethasone GroupHyaluronic Acid Complex Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 35 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

NEW Cyprus Health and Social Sciences University

Mórfou, Guzelyurt, 99750, Cyprus

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Dexamethasone

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PregnadienetriolsPregnadienesPregnanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic CompoundsSteroids, Fluorinated

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research Assistant/PhD Student

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2026

First Posted

October 1, 2026

Study Start

March 5, 2026

Primary Completion

July 25, 2026

Study Completion

July 25, 2026

Last Updated

October 1, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will not be shared, as no IPD sharing plan was established for this study.

Locations