Reliability of Standardized IQ Testing Under Modafinil, Racetam-Class Compounds, Sleep Restriction and Daily Activity
Testing the Reliability of IQ Tests in Various Populations As a Result of Fluctuating Brain Plasticity, Administered Racetam-Class Drugs, Intelligence Placebos, Daily Energy Levels, and Modafinil
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study examined whether standardized IQ test scores in healthy adults aged 18-35 are stable measures of cognitive ability and evaluated whether standardized cognitive-test performance and response-initiation measures vary across pharmacological and sleep conditions. Seventy healthy volunteers were assessed at seven in-person timepoints over six months, with 25 participants receiving an inert matched preparation and 45 receiving modafinil or one of four racetam-class compounds (oxiracetam, pramiracetam, phenylpiracetam, aniracetam) administered orally before testing. A different standardized instrument was administered at each timepoint to limit item-level recall and practice effects, and change in the placebo group was used as the reference for estimating practice effects. Participants were assessed under both rested and sleep-restricted conditions, two psychologists were present at every administration to code response initiation (hesitation), and physiological state was monitored using a consumer wearable. Psychometric changes were evaluated relative to the standard error of measurement of the instruments and the study's prespecified minimum detectable effect. Response-initiation measures were analysed separately from psychometric scores to evaluate potential effects on response initiation and execution time.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1 healthy
Started Mar 2026
Typical duration for phase_1 healthy
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 9, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 9, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 12, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 15, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 1, 2026
CompletedOctober 1, 2026
September 1, 2026
6 months
September 15, 2026
September 25, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Response initiation latency measured by psychologist-coded stimulus-to-committed-response interval
Mean response initiation latency, measured as the interval between presentation of the decision stimulus and initiation of the participant's committed response. Latency will be coded by two psychologists from multiple valid trials under standardized testing conditions and aggregated to a participant-level mean.
Baseline (month 0), monthly interim assessments (months 1-5), and endpoint (month 6).
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Observer-coded hesitation (response initiation interval)
At each of seven in-person assessment sessions over six months, under rested and sleep-restricted conditions
Total response latency
At each of seven in-person assessment sessions over six months, under rested and sleep-restricted conditions
Post-initiation execution time
At each of seven in-person assessment sessions over six months, under rested and sleep-restricted conditions
Other Outcomes (1)
Association between wearable-derived daily activity and standardized cognitive test performance
Continuously across the six-month study period
Study Arms (6)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORTwenty-five participants received an inert matched preparation orally before each assessment. Change observed in this group served as the practice-effect reference for all treatment comparisons.
Modafinil
EXPERIMENTALOral modafinil administered pre-test at each assessment session. The dose administered and the number of participants allocated to this condition are outstanding data items in the source report.
Oxiracetam
EXPERIMENTALOral oxiracetam 100, 200 or 300 mg/day administered pre-test. This range is approximately 8 to 20 times below published human dosing regimens, so results in this condition do not constitute a test of the compound's cognitive efficacy.
Pramiracetam
EXPERIMENTALOral pramiracetam 100, 200 or 300 mg/day administered pre-test. This range is approximately 4 to 12 times below published human dosing regimens, so results in this condition do not constitute a test of the compound's cognitive efficacy.
Phenylpiracetam
EXPERIMENTALOral phenylpiracetam 100, 200 or 300 mg/day administered pre-test. This is the only racetam condition dosed within the published human range (50 to 200 mg/day, typically 100 mg once or twice daily), and therefore the only racetam condition with plausibly meaningful exposure.
Aniracetam
EXPERIMENTALOral aniracetam 100, 200 or 300 mg/day administered pre-test. This range is approximately 5 to 15 times below published human dosing regimens, so results in this condition do not constitute a test of the compound's cognitive efficacy.
Interventions
Administered orally, pre-test, at each of seven assessment sessions over six months. Dose not recorded in the source report.
Administered orally, pre-test, at 100, 200 or 300 mg/day across the six-month study period.
Administered orally, pre-test, at 100, 200 or 300 mg/day across the six-month study period.
Administered orally, pre-test, at 100, 200 or 300 mg/day across the six-month study period.
Administered orally, pre-test, at 100, 200 or 300 mg/day across the six-month study period.
Inert matched preparation administered orally, pre-test, at each assessment session.
Participants were assessed under both rested and sleep-restricted conditions. Sessions were classified against a predefined sleep-duration threshold, and sleep duration was recorded before each cognitive assessment. The numerical threshold is an outstanding data item in the source report.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy adult volunteer
- Aged 18 to 35 years
- Able to attend seven in-person assessment sessions over six months
- Willing to wear a consumer wearable device continuously across the study period
- In relatively good general health
You may not qualify if:
- Current illness at the time of assessment
- Any illness or medical condition disclosed at screening
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Reserology Research Foundation
London, United Kingdom
Related Publications (12)
Roberts CA, Jones A, Sumnall H, Gage SH, Montgomery C. How effective are pharmaceuticals for cognitive enhancement in healthy adults? A series of meta-analyses of cognitive performance during acute administration of modafinil, methylphenidate and D-amphetamine. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020 Sep;38:40-62. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2020.07.002. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
PMID: 32709551BACKGROUNDKredlow MA, Keshishian A, Oppenheimer S, Otto MW. The Efficacy of Modafinil as a Cognitive Enhancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2019 Sep/Oct;39(5):455-461. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001085.
PMID: 31433334BACKGROUNDTurner DC, Robbins TW, Clark L, Aron AR, Dowson J, Sahakian BJ. Cognitive enhancing effects of modafinil in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003 Jan;165(3):260-9. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1250-8. Epub 2002 Nov 1.
PMID: 12417966BACKGROUNDMuller U, Steffenhagen N, Regenthal R, Bublak P. Effects of modafinil on working memory processes in humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004 Dec;177(1-2):161-9. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-1926-3. Epub 2004 Jun 24.
PMID: 15221200BACKGROUNDRepantis D, Schlattmann P, Laisney O, Heuser I. Modafinil and methylphenidate for neuroenhancement in healthy individuals: A systematic review. Pharmacol Res. 2010 Sep;62(3):187-206. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2010.04.002. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
PMID: 20416377BACKGROUNDRandall DC, Shneerson JM, File SE. Cognitive effects of modafinil in student volunteers may depend on IQ. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2005 Sep;82(1):133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2005.07.019. Epub 2005 Sep 2.
PMID: 16140369BACKGROUNDGouhie FA, Barbosa KO, Cruz ABR, Wellichan MM, Zampolli TM. Cognitive effects of piracetam in adults with memory impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Aug;243:108358. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108358. Epub 2024 May 31.
PMID: 38878641BACKGROUNDZhang T, Tao Y, Pu J, Zhu M, Wan L, Tang C. Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of oral (S)-oxiracetam in Chinese healthy volunteers: A randomized, double-blind, controlled phase I study. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2024 Jan 1;192:106621. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2023.106621. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
PMID: 37898393BACKGROUNDMcLean A Jr, Cardenas DD, Burgess D, Gamzu E. Placebo-controlled study of pramiracetam in young males with memory and cognitive problems resulting from head injury and anoxia. Brain Inj. 1991 Oct-Dec;5(4):375-80. doi: 10.3109/02699059109008110.
PMID: 1786500BACKGROUNDGarrett J, Chak C, Bullock T, Giesbrecht B. A systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis provide evidence for an effect of acute physical activity on cognition in young adults. Commun Psychol. 2024 Aug 28;2(1):82. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00124-2.
PMID: 39242965BACKGROUNDEstevis E, Basso MR, Combs D. Effects of practice on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV across 3- and 6-month intervals. Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;26(2):239-54. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2012.659219. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
PMID: 22353021BACKGROUNDBasso MR, Carona FD, Lowery N, Axelrod BN. Practice effects on the WAIS-III across 3- and 6-month intervals. Clin Neuropsychol. 2002 Feb;16(1):57-63. doi: 10.1076/clin.16.1.57.8329.
PMID: 11992227BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rashed
Reserology Research Foundation
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Placebo participants received an inert matched preparation. Participants and assessors were blinded to treatment assignment where operationally feasible, and treatment identity was not disclosed during cognitive scoring. The circumstances in which blinding was not maintained are not specified in the source report, and modafinil produces noticeable subjective alerting effects, so the study is described as placebo-controlled and partially blinded rather than double-blind.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lead Researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 15, 2026
First Posted
October 1, 2026
Study Start
March 9, 2026
Primary Completion
September 9, 2026
Study Completion
September 12, 2026
Last Updated
October 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No repository, access mechanism or data use agreement process exists for this cohort.