Supporting Athletes' Return to Sports After ACL Reconstruction: A Study of a Psychological Readiness Program
UnbrokenACL
EVALUATING A COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL READINESS PROGRAM TO SUPPORT RETURN TO SPORT AFTER ACL RECONSTRUCTION: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED PILOT STUDY
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether an online mental and emotional support program called ACL Unbroken can help people recovering from ACL reconstruction surgery feel more confident and ready to return to sports when used alongside standard physical therapy. The main questions this study aims to answer are:
- Does the ACL Unbroken program help people feel more mentally prepared and confident to return to sports after ACL surgery?
- Does the ACL Unbroken program improve recovery outcomes, such as physical performance, return to sports participation, satisfaction with recovery, and reducing the risk of another ACL injury? Participants in the study will:
- Continue to receive their usual physical therapy and medical care prescribed by their healthcare providers.
- Complete surveys and assessments about their recovery, confidence, readiness to return to sports, and overall recovery experience.
- Be assigned to one of two groups by chance.
- If assigned to the intervention group, receive access to the ACL Unbroken online program, which includes educational lessons and activities focused on goal setting, confidence building, coping with fear of re-injury, stress management, motivation, mindfulness, meditation, visualization, and resilience during recovery.
- If assigned to the comparison group, not receive access to the ACL Unbroken program during the study period. If there is a comparison group, researchers will compare participants who receive the ACL Unbroken program with participants who receive standard care alone to see whether the program improves psychological readiness, recovery outcomes, and return-to-sport success after ACL reconstruction surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 25, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2028
October 1, 2026
September 1, 2026
2.1 years
September 25, 2026
September 25, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport Following ACL Reconstruction at 12 Months
Psychological readiness will be assessed using the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) Scale. The ACL-RSI is a 12-item patient-reported outcome measure evaluating emotions, confidence, and risk appraisal related to returning to sport after ACL reconstruction. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater psychological readiness to return to sport. The mean ACL-RSI score at 12 months post-operatively will be reported.
1 Year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Patient-Reported Knee Function and Quality of Life Following ACL Reconstruction at 12 Months
1 year
Return to Pre-Injury Level of Sport Participation at 12 Months Following ACL Reconstruction
1 Year
Study Arms (2)
Standard of Care
NO INTERVENTIONSubjects in this arm will be randomized. They will not receive the Unbroken Athlete Program. Subjects will follow the standard of care treatment from their care team.
ACL Unbroken Athlete Program
EXPERIMENTALSubjects in this arm will be randomized. They will receive the Unbroken Athlete Program. Subjects will follow the standard of care treatment from their care team and complete scheduled online modules as part of the intervention.
Interventions
The Unbroken Comeback is an online modular recovery program designed for athletes recovering from injury or surgery that focuses on the mental and emotional aspects of rehabilitation, not just the physical recovery. The program aims to help athletes rebuild confidence, resilience, and mindset so they can return to sport or activity stronger and more prepared.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 15 to 25 years
- Athlete planning to return to sport after surgery
- Undergoing primary ACL reconstruction with (BTB) Patellar tendon autograft
You may not qualify if:
- Undergoing primary ACL Reconstruction with a graft source other than (BTB) Patellar tendon autograft
- Multi-ligamentous knee injury requiring repair or reconstruction
- Previous ACL Reconstruction on affected or non-affected lower extremity
- Concomitant articular cartilage procedures
- Patients not planning to return to sport(s) after surgery
- Unable to consistently access wifi or a device to complete the Unbroken Athlete online modular program
- Undergoing 1-1 coaching with a behavioral psychotherapist
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Inova Health System: Orthopedic, Sports Medicine
Fairfax, Virginia, 22031, United States
Related Publications (13)
Dai W, Leng X, Wang J, Cheng J, Hu X, Ao Y. Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2022 Oct;50(12):3425-3439. doi: 10.1177/03635465211030259. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
PMID: 34494906BACKGROUNDBarie A, Sprinckstub T, Huber J, Jaber A. Quadriceps tendon vs. patellar tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction using a hardware-free press-fit fixation technique: comparable stability, function and return-to-sport level but less donor site morbidity in athletes after 10 years. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Oct;140(10):1465-1474. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03508-1. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
PMID: 32504178BACKGROUNDBelk JW, Kraeutler MJ, Carver TJ, McCarty EC. Knee Osteoarthritis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Arthroscopy. 2018 Apr;34(4):1358-1365. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.11.032. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
PMID: 29366740BACKGROUNDShani RH, Umpierez E, Nasert M, Hiza EA, Xerogeanes J. Biomechanical Comparison of Quadriceps and Patellar Tendon Grafts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2016 Jan;32(1):71-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.051. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
PMID: 26382635BACKGROUNDBuller LT, Best MJ, Baraga MG, Kaplan LD. Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the United States. Orthop J Sports Med. 2014 Dec 26;3(1):2325967114563664. doi: 10.1177/2325967114563664. eCollection 2015 Jan.
PMID: 26535368BACKGROUNDSanders TL, Maradit Kremers H, Bryan AJ, Larson DR, Dahm DL, Levy BA, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ. Incidence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears and Reconstruction: A 21-Year Population-Based Study. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Jun;44(6):1502-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546516629944. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
PMID: 26920430BACKGROUNDMurray MM. Optimizing outcomes of ACL surgery-Is autograft reconstruction the only reasonable option? J Orthop Res. 2021 Sep;39(9):1843-1850. doi: 10.1002/jor.25128. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
PMID: 34191344BACKGROUNDEggeling L, Breer S, Drenck TC, Frosch KH, Akoto R. Double-Layered Quadriceps Tendon Autografts Provide Lower Failure Rates and Improved Clinical Results Compared With Hamstring Tendon Grafts in Revision ACL Reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Dec 5;9(12):23259671211046929. doi: 10.1177/23259671211046929. eCollection 2021 Dec.
PMID: 34901287BACKGROUNDGeib TM, Shelton WR, Phelps RA, Clark L. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps tendon autograft: intermediate-term outcome. Arthroscopy. 2009 Dec;25(12):1408-14. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.06.004.
PMID: 19962067BACKGROUNDSmith PA, Stannard JP, Pfeiffer FM, Kuroki K, Bozynski CC, Cook JL. Suspensory Versus Interference Screw Fixation for Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in a Translational Large-Animal Model. Arthroscopy. 2016 Jun;32(6):1086-97. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.11.026. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
PMID: 26853947BACKGROUNDDebarre L, Daxhelet J, DE Lavigne C, Parmentier C. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus graft, comparative study of two tibial fixation devices. Acta Orthop Belg. 2024 Dec;90(4):595-601. doi: 10.52628/90.4.12152.
PMID: 39869862BACKGROUNDKaeding CC, Leger-St-Jean B, Magnussen RA. Epidemiology and Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries. Clin Sports Med. 2017 Jan;36(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
PMID: 27871652RESULTWinkler PW, Vivacqua T, Thomassen S, Lovse L, Lesniak BP, Getgood AMJ, Musahl V. Quadriceps tendon autograft is becoming increasingly popular in revision ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jan;30(1):149-160. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06478-y. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
PMID: 33591370RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Edward S Chang, MD
Inova Health Care Services
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Not Applicable. This is an open label study.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 25, 2026
First Posted
October 1, 2026
Study Start
October 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 31, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2028
Last Updated
October 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The study team does not currently plan to share individual participant data, as preparing datasets for external distribution would require substantial administrative and resource commitments. If data sharing is pursued in the future, appropriate data-sharing mechanisms, such as a Data Use Agreement (DUA) or Collaborative Agreement, will be implemented before any data are disclosed to external parties.