Comparison Between Combined ALLR With Single Bundle and Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
ALLR
Clinical Comparison and Motion Analysis of Sports Function Between Combined Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction With Single Bundle and Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to test and compare different surgical techniques in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- What are the optimal criteria for selecting between single-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with ALL reconstruction?
- How do these two surgical techniques compare in terms of post-operative knee stability, functional outcomes, and reducing re-tear rates? Participants will:
- Undergo pre-operative MRI imaging, ligament stability testing, and motion analysis evaluations
- Be randomly assigned to either:
- Single-bundle ACL + ALL reconstruction
- Double-bundle ACL + ALL reconstruction
- Receive the assigned surgical procedure
- Participate in post-operative follow-ups, ligament stability testing, and motion analysis at 6 months and 1 year Researchers will compare the single-bundle ACL + ALL group and the double-bundle ACL + ALL group to see if one technique demonstrates superior knee stability, functional outcomes (e.g. return to sport ability), and lower ACL re-tear rates.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 18, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 2, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 26, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2026
September 25, 2025
January 1, 2025
2.2 years
March 18, 2024
September 24, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (11)
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score. The IKDC is a patient-completed tool, which contains sections on knee symptoms (7 items), function (2 items), and sports activities (2 items). Scores range from 0 points (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms).
Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
Marx's activity score;The Marx Scale consists of four questions concerning four activities or actions: running, cutting, deceleration, and pivoting. The patient or survey respondent is asked to report on the frequency with which they performed the activity in their healthiest state within the past year. From 0 point(the worst) to 16 points(the best).
Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
SANE score, The Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) is a patient rating from 0-100. Patients rate their current illness score in relation to their pre-injury baseline
Preoperative, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year
Knee ligament stability:
Anterior tibial translation measured using a ligament arthrometer (GNRB) to objectively quantify anteroposterior knee laxity
Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year
Knee ligament stability clinical evaluation
Lachman test
Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year
Knee ligament stability clinical evaluation
pivot shift test
Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year
Knee ligament stability clinical evaluation
Anterior drawer test
Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year
Functional performance and return to sport
Lower limb muscle strength
Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year
Functional performance and return to sport
Lower limb symmetry index
Preoperative, 6 months, 1 year
Imaging
Pre- and post-operative X-ray analysis to assess bone tunnels position
Preoperative, 1 year
Imaging
Pre- and post-operative MRI analysis to assess graft ligamentization.
Preoperative, 1 year
Study Arms (2)
Double bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction
EXPERIMENTALACL reconstruction with triple folded semitendinosus and non folded gracilis and fibertape
Single bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction
EXPERIMENTALSingle bundle ACL combined anterolateral ligament reconstruction
Interventions
Single-Bundle ACL + ALL Reconstruction Group: Patients in this group will undergo reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using a single-bundle graft technique. In addition, they will have the anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstructed using a portion of the same graft material. The single ACL bundle is typically positioned to replicate the anatomic footprint of the native ACL. For the ALL reconstruction, a commonly used technique is the Sonnery-Cottet ALL reconstruction using a gracilis tendon graft. This combines an intra-articular ACL reconstruction with an extra-articular lateral tenodesis to improve rotational instability.
Double-Bundle ACL + ALL Reconstruction Group: Patients in this group will undergo anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction using two graft bundles to more anatomically replicate the native ACL\'s anteromedial and posterolateral bundles. Like the single-bundle group, they will also have supplemental ALL reconstruction performed using a portion of the graft material. The double-bundle ACL reconstruction aims to better restore the ACL\'s complex anatomic footprint and bundles\' tension patterns.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients plan to receive ACL surgery
- at least 18 years old
You may not qualify if:
- Presented history of the injured leg or congenital abnormality
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Chang Gung memorial hospital
Taoyuan District, taoyuan, 333, Taiwan
Related Publications (5)
Cameron KL, Peck KY, Davi SM, Owens CRBD, Svoboda CRSJ, DiStefano LJ, Marshall SW, de la Motte SJ, Beutler CRAI, Padua DA. Association Between Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) Items and the Incidence Rate of Lower Extremity Stress Fracture. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Jun 9;10(6):23259671221100790. doi: 10.1177/23259671221100790. eCollection 2022 Jun.
PMID: 35706554BACKGROUNDHelito CP, Helito PVP, Costa HP, Demange MK, Bordalo-Rodrigues M. Assessment of the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Acute Injuries of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament. Arthroscopy. 2017 Jan;33(1):140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
PMID: 27324971BACKGROUNDSonnery-Cottet B, Thaunat M, Freychet B, Pupim BH, Murphy CG, Claes S. Outcome of a Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Technique With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1598-605. doi: 10.1177/0363546515571571. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
PMID: 25740835BACKGROUNDBatty LM, Firth A, Moatshe G, Bryant DM, Heard M, McCormack RG, Rezansoff A, Peterson DC, Bardana D, MacDonald PB, Verdonk PCM, Spalding T, Getgood AMJ; STABILITY Study Group; Willits K, Birmingham T, Hewison C, Wanlin S, Firth A, Pinto R, Martindale A, O'Neill L, Jennings M, Daniluk M, Boyer D, Zomar M, Moon K, Pritchett R, Payne K, Fan B, Mohan B, Buchko GM, Hiemstra LA, Kerslake S, Tynedal J, Stranges G, Mcrae S, Gullett L, Brown H, Legary A, Longo A, Christian M, Ferguson C, Mohtadi N, Barber R, Chan D, Campbell C, Garven A, Pulsifer K, Mayer M, Simunovic N, Duong A, Robinson D, Levy D, Skelly M, Shanmugaraj A, Howells F, Tough M, Thompson P, Metcalfe A, Asplin L, Dube A, Clarkson L, Brown J, Bolsover A, Bradshaw C, Belgrove L, Millan F, Turner S, Verdugo S, Lowe J, Dunne D, McGowan K, Suddens CM, Declercq G, Vuylsteke K, Van Haver M. Association of Ligamentous Laxity, Male Sex, Chronicity, Meniscal Injury, and Posterior Tibial Slope With a High-Grade Preoperative Pivot Shift: A Post Hoc Analysis of the STABILITY Study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Apr 6;9(4):23259671211000038. doi: 10.1177/23259671211000038. eCollection 2021 Apr.
PMID: 33889648BACKGROUNDSonnery-Cottet B, Daggett M, Fayard JM, Ferretti A, Helito CP, Lind M, Monaco E, de Padua VBC, Thaunat M, Wilson A, Zaffagnini S, Zijl J, Claes S. Anterolateral Ligament Expert Group consensus paper on the management of internal rotation and instability of the anterior cruciate ligament - deficient knee. J Orthop Traumatol. 2017 Jun;18(2):91-106. doi: 10.1007/s10195-017-0449-8.
PMID: 28220268BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cheng-Pang Dr. Yang
Cheng Gung memorial hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2024
First Posted
April 2, 2024
Study Start
June 26, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 31, 2026
Last Updated
September 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
1. Protection of participant privacy and confidentiality is paramount in this study involving sensitive medical data and procedures. Sharing identifiable IPD could breach the trust and privacy of these patients undergoing knee surgeries. 2. The informed consent process likely did not explicitly state or obtain approval from participants to share their individual-level data, including medical images, functional assessments, and clinical outcomes, with third parties outside the research team.