Metacognitive Interpersonal Therapy for Male Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators With Personality Disorders
MIT-MDO-PT
Preliminary Efficacy of the Portuguese Adaptation of Metacognitive Interpersonal Therapy for Male Domestic Offenders (MIT-MDO-PT) in Men Under Judicial Supervision for Intimate Partner Violence With Personality Disorders: A Preregistered Multiple-Baseline Single-Case Experimental Design With Partner-Reported External Validation
4 other identifiers
interventional
7
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the preliminary efficacy of MIT-MDO-PT, the European Portuguese cultural and linguistic adaptation of Metacognitive Interpersonal Therapy for Male Domestic Offenders (MIT-MDO), in adult men under judicial supervision for intimate partner violence (IPV) offences who meet criteria for a personality disorder. MIT-MDO-PT is an individual psychotherapy of 24 weekly 50-minute sessions delivered over approximately six months in four phases (case formulation and metacognitive assessment; mentalization and affect regulation; memory rescripting and shame transformation; consolidation and relapse prevention). The study uses a preregistered nonconcurrent multiple-baseline single-case experimental design across participants (target N = 5-7; enrolment ceiling 7): each participant completes a baseline phase with weekly monitoring (target of five data points), and treatment onsets are fixed a priori and staggered by at least three weeks between participants to provide internal experimental control without randomization. Primary outcomes are self-reported IPV perpetration (Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, CTS2), metacognition (Metacognition Self-Assessment Scale, MSAS) and personality pathology (Personality Inventory for DSM-5, PID-5), assessed at baseline (T0), after sessions 8 (T1), 16 (T2) and 24 (T3) and at 8-10-week follow-up (T4), with weekly monitoring of IPV (CTS2 physical assault and psychological aggression subscales) and psychological distress (CORE-10) throughout baseline and treatment. Where available, partners are assessed independently by a hospital victim-support service at T0 and T3 (Danger Assessment-5, CTS2 partner version, Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory-Short Form). Outcome assessment at T0, T3 and T4 is performed by an assessor independent of the therapist. Objectively recorded violence-related incidents (police or judicial occurrences, breaches notified by the supervising services, hospital safety-protocol activations) are collected as a secondary outcome. Analyses are conducted per participant (reliable change index, percentage of non-overlapping data, non-overlap of all pairs, Tau-U, structured visual analysis), with study-level conclusions based on replication across participants. Treatment fidelity is monitored through structured session notes and blind rating of 20% of sessions. The study is preregistered on the Open Science Framework (osf.io/wqpnc; protocol update v3.1, September 2026) and has a favourable opinion from the Ethics Committee of the University of Beira Interior, subject to the formal authorizations of the referring institutions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2027
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 17, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 29, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2027
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2028
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2028
September 29, 2026
September 1, 2026
1.2 years
September 17, 2026
September 22, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in self-reported intimate partner violence perpetration (CTS2)
Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2), perpetration scales (physical assault, psychological aggression, sexual coercion, injury); European Portuguese version. Metric: reliable change index (RCI, Jacobson \& Truax) between T0 and T3; \|RCI\| \>= 1.96 indicates reliable change; decrease = improvement.
Baseline (T0) and end of treatment (T3, after Session 24, approximately 6 months after treatment onset)
Change in metacognition (MSAS)
Metacognition Self-Assessment Scale (MSAS; Pedone et al., 2017; European Portuguese version: Faustino et al., 2021; 18 items; total score and four factor scores: self-reflexivity, critical distance, mastery, understanding other minds). Metric: RCI between T0 and T3 on the total score (\|RCI\| \>= 1.96; increase = improvement). Factor scores reported descriptively.
Baseline (T0) and end of treatment (T3, after Session 24, approximately 6 months after treatment onset)
Change in personality pathology (PID-5)
Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), adult form, five domain scores (T-scores, Portuguese norms). Metric: RCI between T0 and T3 per domain (\|RCI\| \>= 1.96; decrease = improvement). Facets reported descriptively.
Baseline (T0) and end of treatment (T3, after Session 24, approximately 6 months after treatment onset)
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Weekly intimate partner violence monitoring series (CTS2 subscales)
Weekly from start of baseline (target of five weekly points) through Session 24 (approximately 7-8 months per participant)
Weekly psychological distress (CORE-10)
Weekly from start of baseline (3-5 weeks) through Session 24 (approximately 7-8 months per participant)
Maintenance of gains at follow-up (CTS2, MSAS, PID-5)
Baseline (T0) and follow-up (T4, 8-10 weeks after Session 24)
Change in global psychological distress (CORE-OM)
Baseline (T0), 8 weeks (T1), 16 weeks (T2), 24 weeks (T3, end of treatment) and 32-34 weeks (T4, follow-up) after treatment onset
Change in interpersonal problems (IIP-32)
Baseline (T0), 16 weeks (T2), 24 weeks (T3, end of treatment) and 32-34 weeks (T4, follow-up) after treatment onset
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (9)
Working alliance (WAI-SR)
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 after treatment onset (Sessions 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24)
Empathy (IRI)
Baseline (T0), 8 weeks (T1), 16 weeks (T2), 24 weeks (T3, end of treatment) and 32-34 weeks (T4, follow-up) after treatment onset
Treatment fidelity index (TFI)
Throughout treatment (24 weekly sessions, approximately 6 months)
- +6 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
MIT-MDO-PT
EXPERIMENTALAdult men under judicial supervision for intimate partner violence with a personality disorder receive 24 individual weekly 50-minute sessions of MIT-MDO-PT after a baseline phase with weekly monitoring (target of five weekly data points; minimum of three only under imminent risk). Treatment onsets are fixed a priori and staggered by at least three weeks between participants (nonconcurrent multiple-baseline design).
Interventions
Manualised individual psychotherapy (24 weekly sessions, 50 minutes, approximately 6 months) adapted to European Portuguese from MIT-MDO. Phase I (Sessions 1-8): shared case formulation and metacognitive assessment; Phase II (Sessions 9-16): mentalization and affect regulation; Phase III (Sessions 17-21): memory rescripting and shame transformation; Phase IV (Sessions 22-24): consolidation and relapse prevention. Delivered by a psychologist trained in MIT (Levels I-III) under weekly clinical supervision by the model developer. Fidelity: structured session notes (100% of sessions) and blind rating of 20% of sessions with the MIT-MDO-PT Session Fidelity Checklist; adherence threshold \>= 80%.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male, aged 18 years or older
- Under judicial supervision (e.g., suspended sentence, provisional suspension of proceedings, or other court-ordered measure) for intimate partner violence offences, referred by the Directorate-General for Reintegration and Prison Services (DGRSP) or by the Hospital Beatriz Ângelo victim-support service
- Personality disorder confirmed by the SCID-5-PD (at least one diagnosis) AND elevation of at least one PID-5 domain (T-score \>= 60, Portuguese norms)
- Current or recent intimate partner violence perpetration
- Voluntary informed consent, given independently of the judicial mandate
- Fluency in Portuguese
- Ability to commit to the 24-session weekly protocol
You may not qualify if:
- Psychopathy, operationalised as antisocial personality disorder confirmed by the SCID-5-PD together with a total score of 70 or above on the Self-Report Psychopathy Scale - Short Form (SRP-SF, European Portuguese version), administered at screening only to candidates meeting antisocial personality disorder criteria; clinical indicators from the screening interview and the referral file (generalised instrumental violence, absence of remorse and of affective bonding) are recorded as supporting information
- Active psychosis or severe cognitive impairment
- Imminent risk of harm to the victim requiring immediate protective intervention
- Substance dependence requiring concurrent intensive treatment
- Concurrent psychotherapy (ongoing pharmacotherapy is permitted)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centre for the Rehabilitation of Domestic Violence Perpetrators (CRAVDA), Loures Municipality
Loures, Lisbon District, Portugal
Related Publications (2)
Misso D, Schweitzer RD, Dimaggio G. Metacognition and mentalization in intimate partner violence perpetrators: Theoretical and clinical implications. J Psychother Integr. 2019;29(4):359-375. doi:10.1037/int0000111
BACKGROUNDPasetto A, Misso D, Velotti P, Dimaggio G. Metacognitive interpersonal therapy for male domestic offenders (MIT-MDO) with personality disorders: A proof-of-concept case series. Psychol Psychother. 2026 Jun;99(2):463-483. doi: 10.1111/papt.70036. Epub 2026 Jan 5.
PMID: 41490723BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hugo C Vicente, MSc
University of Beira Interior
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Single-group, open-label design. Outcome assessment at baseline (T0), end of treatment (T3, including the SCID-5-PD) and follow-up (T4) is performed by the same assessor, independent of the therapist and not involved in treatment delivery. The weekly monitoring series is self-completed by the participant on a secure platform before each session, without the therapist present. T1 and T2 assessments are unblinded. Treatment fidelity is rated by an independent rater blind to outcome data on 20% of sessions.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, Doctoral Programme in Clinical and Health Psychology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 17, 2026
First Posted
September 29, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2028
Last Updated
September 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data and code will become available within 12 months after study completion (anticipated by December 2028) and will remain available indefinitely on OSF.
- Access Criteria
- Open access to de-identified quantitative data and code via OSF. Any request for additional variables will be assessed by the Principal Investigator and the UBI Ethics Committee, in accordance with GDPR and Portuguese law; data-use agreements may be required.
De-identified participant-level data (weekly repeated measures and pre/post questionnaire scores) and the analysis code will be deposited on the Open Science Framework (OSF) project page at study completion, subject to ethical and legal constraints (judicially supervised participants; approval by the UBI Ethics Committee). Partner-reported data will be shared only in aggregate or fully de-identified form to protect victim safety. Session recordings and clinical notes will not be shared.