Evaluating Interventions for Intimate Partner Violence Use in Washington State
1 other identifier
interventional
800
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Intimate partner violence (IPV), specifically physical and psychological aggression toward an intimate partner, represents a public health crisis that affects millions of Americans each year. There currently exists very little evidence from randomized controlled trials for the effectiveness of abuser intervention programs designed to prevent and end perpetration of IPV in the general population. This is troubling considering that approximately half a million men and women are court-mandated to these programs each year. The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Strength at Home (SAH) intervention in reducing intimate partner violence (IPV). The overarching aim of this study is to determine whether outcomes achieved through SAH are non-inferior to those achieved through standard IPV interventions offered in the state of Washington (treatment as usual; TAU) among court-involved men who have used IPV. The specific aims are: 1.1: Compare the frequency of physical and psychological IPV, the primary outcomes of interest, across conditions as reported by the male participants and their intimate partners across Time 1 (baseline) and four 3-month follow ups (Times 2-5). It is expected that reductions in physical and psychological IPV perpetration observed in SAH will be non-inferior to those observed in TAU over the course of the year. 1.2: Compare symptoms of PTSD, alexithymia, and alcohol use problems across conditions and assessment time points as reported by the male participants. It is expected that reductions in PTSD symptoms, alexithymia, and alcohol use problems observed in SAH will be non-inferior to those observed in TAU over the course of the year. 1.3: Compare treatment satisfaction across conditions as reported by the male participants across the four 3-month follow ups (Times 2-5). It is expected that treatment satisfaction in SAH will be comparable to or greater than treatment satisfaction in TAU.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 25, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 18, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2027
June 23, 2026
June 1, 2026
2.6 years
July 25, 2024
June 18, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
IPV assessment
The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2), a 20-item instrument, will be used to assess IPV. The Physical Assault (12 items) and Psychological Aggression (8 items) subscales will be administered. Each of the 20 items is scored by the frequency of occurrence of the item with 8 choices 1-7 and 0.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months. 9 months, 12 months
Psychological IPV assessment
The 7-item Restrictive Engulfment subscale of the Multidimensional Measure of Emotional Abuse (MMEA) will be used as an additional measure of psychological IPV. Each item has 7 potential responses from 0=never to 6= more than 20 times. Scores can range from 0 to 42, with higher scores being associated with more psychological IPV.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months. 9 months, 12 months
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) symptoms
The 20-item PTSD Checklist for DSM 5 (PCL-5) will be used to assess PTSD symptoms. It is a self-report measure. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale \[0 to 4\] and summed. Scores range from 0 to 80 with higher scores associated with more PTSD symptoms. A total score of 33 or higher may indicate severe PTSD.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months. 9 months, 12 months
Alcohol use
The 10-item Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) will be used to assess problem drinking behavior over the past six months, with higher scores reflecting greater alcohol misuse.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months. 9 months, 12 months
Alexithymia assessment
The 20-itemToronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) will be used to assess alexithymia. The TAS-20 uses cutoff scoring, with scores of 52-60 indicating possible alexithymia, and scores above 60 indicating alexithymia.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months. 9 months, 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Treatment Satisfaction
3 months, 6 months. 9 months, 12 months
Study Arms (2)
Strength at Home (SAH)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants randomized into this arm with receive a trauma-informed intimate partner violence (IPV) intervention program.
Treatment as Usual (TAU)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants randomized into this arm with receive a standard IPV intervention program in the state of Washington.
Interventions
SAH is a group intervention that incorporates elements from interventions for violence and trauma. It is administered during 20 two-hour weekly sessions. The program uses a social information processing model based on the premise that trauma negatively impacts one's ability to interpret and respond to social situations effectively. It underscores the importance of cognitive behavioral strategies to monitor one's thoughts and responses to interpersonal situations.
Treatment as usual for IPV includes court-mandated interventions that require a minimum of 26 two-hour weekly sessions in Washington State and often extend substantially longer.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men:
- Identify as a man
- Provide consent for the research team to contact his intimate partner(s) for data collection purposes;
- Court-referred for IPV intervention in Washington state
- Women:
- Identify as a woman
- Were or currently are an intimate partner involved in an incident of IPV with a court-referred participant
You may not qualify if:
- demonstrates active psychosis that may interfere with their ability to participate in group
- expresses prominent suicidal or homicidal ideation that requires hospitalization
- does not possess proficiency in spoken English
- periods of incarceration after study enrollment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
BU Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Psychiatry
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Casey Taft, PhD
BU School of Medicine and National Center for PTSD
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 25, 2024
First Posted
July 29, 2024
Study Start
November 18, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Last Updated
June 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share