Ultra-Processed Foods, DASH Diet, and Well-Being in Severe Mental Illness
Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and DASH Diet Quality in Severe Mental Illness: Associations With Psychological and Inflammatory Outcomes
1 other identifier
observational
105
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aimed to investigate the associations of ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption and DASH diet adherence with psychological well-being, emotional eating, and inflammatory markers in individuals with severe mental illness (SMI). This cross-sectional study included clinically stable individuals aged 18-65 years who had been diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder according to the diagnostic criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) or the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10). Participants were selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected face-to-face using a Sociodemographic Information Form, the Screening Questionnaire of Highly Processed Food Consumption (SQ-HPF), the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Quality (DASH-Q), the Psychological Well-Being Scale, and the Emotional Eating Scale. Anthropometric measurements and routine biochemical data, including fasting glucose, C-reactive protein (CRP), and complete blood count parameters, were recorded.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Apr 2026
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 7, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 28, 2026
CompletedSeptember 28, 2026
September 1, 2026
4 months
September 7, 2026
September 24, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (14)
Questionnaire Form
Sociodemographic characteristics of the individuals (age, constipation status, presence of comorbidities, gender, smoking and alcohol use) were questioned.
4 months
Body weight (BW)
BW was measured using a calibrated digital scale placed on a flat, tiled surface. The scale was sensitive to 100 grams.
4 months
Height
Height was measured using a stadiometer with the participant's head positioned in the Frankfort plane and feet placed together.
4 months
Body Mass Index (BMI)
BMI was calculated by dividing body weight (in kilograms) by the square of height (in meters): BMI = weight (kg) / height² (m²).
4 months
C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
CRP levels were measured using routine laboratory procedures in outpatient visits.
4 months
Hemoglobin (Hb)
Hemoglobin (Hb) levels were measured using routine laboratory procedures in outpatient visits.
4 months
Neutrophil
Neutrophil levels were measured using routine laboratory procedures in outpatient visits.
4 months
Lymphocyte
Lymphocyte levels were measured using routine laboratory procedures in outpatient visits.
4 months
Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII)
Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII)
4 months
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)
The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a hematological marker of systemic inflammation, was calculated by dividing the absolute neutrophil count by the absolute lymphocyte count.
4 months
The Screening Questionnaire of Highly Processed Food Consumption (SQ-HPF)
The Screening Questionnaire of Highly Processed Food Consumption (SQ-HPF) is a brief dietary assessment tool developed to evaluate the frequency of consumption of highly processed foods. The questionnaire assesses the consumption of various food groups commonly classified as highly processed and provides an overall score reflecting the frequency of highly processed food consumption. sQ-HPF is an 11-item dietary screening tool used to assess highly processed food consumption. Each item is scored as 0 or 1, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 11. Higher scores indicate higher consumption of highly processed foods and therefore a worse outcome. A total score of 6 or higher indicates a high level of highly processed food consumption.
4 months
The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Quality (DASH-Q)
The Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Quality (DASH-Q) is a dietary assessment tool designed to evaluate adherence to the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) dietary pattern. The scale assesses the consumption of key food groups and nutrients emphasized in the DASH diet, with higher scores indicating greater adherence to the DASH dietary pattern. DASH-Q is an 11-item dietary assessment tool designed to evaluate adherence to the DASH dietary pattern. Each item is scored from 0 to 7 according to the number of days the corresponding food group was consumed during the previous 7 days, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 77. Total scores are classified as low (0-32), moderate (33-51), or high (52-77) diet quality. Higher scores indicate greater adherence to the DASH dietary pattern and therefore represent a better outcome.
4 months
Emotional Eating Scale (EES)
The Emotional Eating Scale (EES) is a self-report instrument designed to assess the tendency to eat in response to emotional states. It evaluates eating behavior associated with various emotional states, with higher scores indicating a greater tendency toward emotional eating. EES is a 16-item scale consisting of three subscales: anger, anxiety, and depression. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (no desire to eat) to 5 (an overwhelming urge to eat). There are no reverse-scored items. The total score ranges from 16 to 80, with higher scores indicating a higher level of emotional eating behavior and therefore a worse outcome.
4 months
Psychological Well-being Scale
The Psychological Well-Being Scale is a self-report instrument designed to assess individuals' overall psychological well-being and positive psychological functioning. Higher scores indicate higher levels of psychological well-being.The Psychological Well-Being Scale is an 8-item scale designed to assess individuals' psychological well-being. Each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The total score ranges from 8 to 56, with higher scores indicating greater psychological resources and strengths and a more positive evaluation of oneself in important areas of functioning, therefore representing a better outcome.
4 months
Study Arms (1)
Participants with severe mental illness
This study included 105 adult participants with severe mental illness. No control group was included.
Interventions
No intervention (observational study)
Eligibility Criteria
The study population consisted of adults aged 18-65 years with a psychiatric disorder confirmed according to DSM-5 or ICD-10 diagnostic criteria. Participants were clinically stable and had been receiving treatment for at least 1 month. A total of 105 participants were initially included in the study, while 92 participants were included in the final analyses after excluding those with incomplete data. No control group was included.
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18-65 years
- Having a psychiatric disorder confirmed according to DSM-5 or ICD-10 diagnostic criteria
- Being clinically stable
- Having received treatment for at least 1 month
You may not qualify if:
- Severe cognitive impairment or a diagnosis of dementia
- Experiencing an acute psychiatric crisis
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Having a medical condition that severely restricts dietary intake (e.g., renal failure or ongoing cancer treatment)
- A history of major surgery within the previous 3 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, Faculty of Health Sciences
Bolu, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nurefşan Konyalıgil Öztürk
Abant Izzet Baysal University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assist. Prof. Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 7, 2026
First Posted
September 28, 2026
Study Start
April 1, 2026
Primary Completion
August 1, 2026
Study Completion
August 1, 2026
Last Updated
September 28, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09