Two Different Videolaryngoscopes Were Used İn The Pediatric Patient Group

NCT07837882 | Recruiting

• 1 other identifier: GOKAEK 2026/6/11
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 60
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Modern alternatives to traditional laryngoscopes utilize fiber optic or digital technology to project images from the tip of the laryngoscope onto an eyepiece or monitor for improved visualization by the practitioner. Videolaryngoscopes have become an integral part of routine clinical practice and training programs, and a preferred option after failed DL (directional visualization). This study will compare two different videolaryngoscopes in pediatric participants.

Conditions

Pediatric; Intubation

Keywords

Pediatric; videolaryngoscope; PEDİAC Score

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• intubation time

  The time elapsed from the passage of the laryngoscope blade through the teeth to the detection of end-tidal CO₂.

  2 minutes after induction

Secondary Outcomes (3)

• PeDiAC Score

  1 hour

• Cormack-Lehane glottic view scale

  1 hour

• Successful intubation attempt

  1 hour

Study Arms (2)

group E

In this group, intubation will be performed using an Endolarenx brand videolaryngoscope.

Device: In this group, intubation will be performed using a Endolarenx brand videolaryngoscope

Grup B

In this group, intubation will be performed using a Besdata brand videolaryngoscope.

Device: In this group, intubation will be performed using a Besdata brand videolaryngoscope

Interventions

In this group, intubation will be performed using a Endolarenx brand videolaryngoscope DEVICE

In this group, intubation will be performed using a Endolarenx brand videolaryngoscope

group E

In this group, intubation will be performed using a Besdata brand videolaryngoscope DEVICE

In this group, intubation will be performed using a Besdata brand videolaryngoscope

Grup B

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 2 Years - 10 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Child (0-17)
• Sampling Method: Probability Sample

Study Population

pediatric participant

You may qualify if:

• ASA I-II
• years old
• Elective surgery
• Requirement for intubation under general anesthesia
• Expected normal airway

You may not qualify if:

• Difficult airway on preoperative assessment
• Need for rapid serial intubation
• History of previous difficult intubation
• Cervical instability
• Upper respiratory tract infection within the last 4 weeks
• Neuromuscular disease
• History of asthma

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Samsun University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Samsun University

Samsun, Mağaza Seçiniz, 55090, Turkey (Türkiye)

RECRUITING

Study Officials

• Hatice Selcuk Kuşderci

  Samsun University

  STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Hatice Selcuk Kuşderci

CONTACT

+905052159896; drkusderci@hotmail.com

Ebru Kayıkçi

CONTACT

+905343605118; ebrukayikci@hotmail.com

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: COHORT
• Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: September 1, 2026
• First Posted: September 24, 2026
• Study Start: May 1, 2026
• Primary Completion (Estimated): December 30, 2026
• Study Completion (Estimated): December 31, 2026
• Last Updated: September 24, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-05

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

TU (1)