Sperm Selection Strategies and Male-Factor Phenotypes in ICSI
ANDRO-ART
Comparative Effectiveness of Conventional ICSI, Hyaluronan-Binding Sperm Selection, and Microfluidic Sperm Selection Across Male-Factor Phenotypes: A Multicentre Retrospective Cohort Study
1 other identifier
observational
12,561
1 country
10
Brief Summary
This retrospective multicentre observational cohort study evaluates clinical and reproductive outcomes associated with different sperm-selection strategies used during intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), including conventional ICSI, hyaluronan-binding sperm selection (PICSI), and microfluidic sperm selection. The study uses routinely collected real-world clinical and laboratory data from fertility treatment cycles performed at multiple centres. Analyses will assess overall comparative effectiveness and whether treatment effects differ according to male-factor phenotypes, including sperm DNA fragmentation. Key outcomes include fertilization, embryo development, pregnancy establishment, pregnancy loss, and cumulative reproductive outcomes at the source-cycle level. The study is observational; treatment allocation was determined by routine clinical practice rather than by a study protocol.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2020
Longer than P75 for all trials
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 2, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 6, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 17, 2026
CompletedSeptember 17, 2026
September 1, 2026
6.7 years
September 6, 2026
September 11, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pregnancy Loss After Clinical Pregnancy
Pregnancy loss following an established clinical pregnancy. The proportion of clinical pregnancies resulting in pregnancy loss will be compared across conventional ICSI, hyaluronan-binding sperm selection (PICSI), and microfluidic sperm selection. Prespecified analyses will assess effect modification by sperm DNA fragmentation, including SDF \>20% versus ≤20%.
Up to 22 completed weeks of gestation
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Clinical Pregnancy
Up to 8 weeks after embryo transfer
Cumulative Clinical Pregnancy per Source ICSI Cycle
From the source ICSI procedure through the last recorded embryo transfer derived from that procedure, up to 5 years
Normal Fertilization Rate
Approximately 16-18 hours after ICSI
Blastocyst Development Rate
From normal fertilization assessment through day 5-7 of embryo culture
Other Outcomes (2)
No Usable Embryo per Initiated ICSI Cycle
From ICSI through completion of embryo culture for the source cycle
Zero 2PN per Initiated ICSI Cycle
Approximately 16-18 hours after ICSI
Study Arms (3)
Conventional ICSI
ICSI source cycles in which spermatozoa were selected using routine conventional laboratory preparation without hyaluronan-binding or microfluidic sperm selection.
PICSI
ICSI source cycles in which spermatozoa were selected using hyaluronan-binding sperm selection (PICSI) as part of routine clinical practice.
Microfluidic Sperm Selection
ICSI source cycles in which spermatozoa were prepared using a microfluidic sperm-selection device (ZyMōt) as part of routine clinical practice.
Interventions
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection performed after routine conventional sperm preparation without hyaluronan-binding sperm selection or microfluidic sperm selection.
Hyaluronan-binding sperm selection used before intracytoplasmic sperm injection as part of routine clinical practice.
Microfluidic sperm selection used before intracytoplasmic sperm injection as part of routine clinical practice.
Eligibility Criteria
The study population comprises adult women undergoing ICSI treatment in routine clinical practice across multiple fertility centres. Eligible source ICSI cycles are retrospectively classified according to the sperm-selection strategy used: conventional ICSI, hyaluronan-binding sperm selection (PICSI), or microfluidic sperm selection. The primary analysis includes an unselected all-comers population, with prespecified phenotype-specific analyses according to male-factor characteristics, including sperm DNA fragmentation.
You may qualify if:
- Adult women undergoing an ICSI source cycle at a participating fertility centre during the study period.
- Source cycles performed using conventional ICSI, hyaluronan-binding sperm selection (PICSI), or microfluidic sperm selection.
- Availability of routinely collected clinical and embryological data sufficient to classify the sperm-selection strategy and evaluate at least one prespecified study outcome.
You may not qualify if:
- Cycles not involving ICSI.
- Records with insufficient or internally inconsistent data preventing reliable identification of the source ICSI cycle or sperm-selection strategy.
- Cycles involving combined hyaluronan-binding and microfluidic sperm selection are excluded from the primary three-group comparative analysis and may be evaluated separately in prespecified sensitivity analyses.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (10)
Bocian Fertility Clinic, Poznań
Poznan, Greater Poland Voivodeship, 60-529, Poland
Bocian Fertility Clinic, Lublin
Lublin, Lublin Voivodeship, 20-819, Poland
Bocian Fertility Clinic, Warsaw Śródmieście
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 00-193, Poland
Bocian Fertility Clinic, Rzeszów
Rzeszów, Podkarpackie Voivodeship, 35-309, Poland
Bocian Fertility Clinic, Białystok
Bialystok, Podlaskie Voivodeship, 15-267, Poland
Bocian Fertility Clinic, Gdańsk
Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship, 80-244, Poland
Bocian Fertility Clinic, Katowice
Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship, 40-081, Poland
Bocian Fertility Clinic, Szczecin
Szczecin, West Pomeranian Voivodeship, 70-225, Poland
Bocian Fertility Clinic, Łódź
Lodz, Łódź Voivodeship, 90-440, Poland
Bocian Fertility Clinic, Kielce
Kielce, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship, 25-435, Poland
Related Publications (3)
Ferreira Aderaldo J, da Silva Maranhao K, Ferreira Lanza DC. Does microfluidic sperm selection improve clinical pregnancy and miscarriage outcomes in assisted reproductive treatments? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2023 Nov 20;18(11):e0292891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292891. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37983267RESULTGisbert Iranzo A, Cano-Extremera M, Hervas I, Falquet Guillem M, Gil Julia M, Navarro-Gomezlechon A, Pacheco-Rendon RM, Garrido N. Sperm Selection Using Microfluidic Techniques Significantly Decreases Sperm DNA Fragmentation (SDF), Enhancing Reproductive Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biology (Basel). 2025 Jun 30;14(7):792. doi: 10.3390/biology14070792.
PMID: 40723352RESULTKirkman-Brown J, Pavitt S, Khalaf Y, Lewis S, Hooper R, Bhattacharya S, Coomarasamy A, Sharma V, Brison D, Forbes G, West R, Pacey A, Brian K, Cutting R, Bolton V, Miller D. Sperm selection for assisted reproduction by prior hyaluronan binding: the HABSelect RCT. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2019 Feb. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537400/
PMID: 30758931RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Przemysław Ciepiela, MD, PhD
Bocian Fertility Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 6, 2026
First Posted
September 17, 2026
Study Start
January 2, 2020
Primary Completion
September 1, 2026
Study Completion
September 1, 2026
Last Updated
September 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared because the study is based on retrospectively collected multicentre clinical data containing sensitive health information. Data sharing is additionally subject to institutional governance, data-protection regulations, and restrictions related to the original clinical databases.