The Clinical Impact of Serratus Anterior VS. Erector Spinae Plane Block on Pain Management of Tube Thoracostomy in Emergency Department Patients.
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In the emergency department, tube thoracostomy is a common critical procedure to manage symptomatic pleural issues such as pneumothorax and pleural effusion.\[1\] This technique employed to remove air or fluid from the pleural cavity, restore negative intrapleural pressure and let the lungs expand again to help normal cardiopulmonary function to be restored again. \[2\] However, the procedure is often associated with significant pain, with approximately 50% of patients reporting pain levels between 9-10 out of 10 during the intervention, and for pain management emergency physicians have traditionally combined local anesthetics with opioids or anxiolytics. Yet, these methods have notable drawbacks: opioids carry risks of addiction and adverse side effects (e.g., nausea/vomiting, respiratory depression, delirium), while procedural sedation is time-intensive, requires monitoring, and carries risks of complications such as apnea and hypotension.\[3\] Local anesthetic infiltration for pain management can also fail to effectively and evenly target the intercostal nerves responsible for chest wall sensation.\[4\] Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks (erector spinae plane and serratus plane blocks) have recently been proposed as targeted alternatives for reliable and extended pain control of tube thoracostomy as each block produces a unique distribution of anesthesia. \[5\] Despite establishing of these techniques for pain control during thoracic surgeries, its application in emergency settings for tube thoracostomy is underexplored enough yet \[6\], a gap explicitly identified in the recent literature.\[4\] Therefore, in this study we evaluate the impact of ESP and SAP block for pain management and overall quality of recovery which practically performed by emergency physicians.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2027
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 11, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 17, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2027
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2029
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2029
September 17, 2026
September 1, 2026
2.6 years
September 11, 2026
September 11, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intraprocedural pain score (NRS 0-10) recorded immediately after tube insertion and pleural fixation.
24 HR
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Total rescue opioid/sedative dose.
24 HR
Time required to perform the block (needle-in to needle-out).
first 24 HR
procedure-related complications (pneumothorax, hematoma, local anesthetic systemic toxicity, block failure).
first 24 HR
Study Arms (2)
SAPB
EXPERIMENTALESPB
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Ultrasound-guided fascial plane block,serratus plane blocks for reliable and extended pain control of tube thoracostomy using 20-30 mL of bupivacaine 0.25%
Ultrasound-guided fascial plane block,Erector spinae plane block for reliable and extended pain control of tube thoracostomy using 20-30 mL of bupivacaine 0.25%.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged ≥18 to =\<60 years presenting to the ED requiring tube thoracostomy.
- hemodynamically stable (systolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg).
- Able to provide informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Tension pneumothorax or hemodynamic instability requiring immediate tube insertion without time for block performance.
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics.
- Infection or cellulitis overlying the intended needle insertion site.
- Chronic opioid use/dependence, or substance use disorder that would confound pain and opioid-consumption outcomes.
- Psychiatric illness, cognitive impairment, intoxication, or severe traumatic brain injury (GCS \< 13) precluding reliable pain-score reporting or informed consent.
- Body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m² (sonoanatomic landmarks less reliable).
- Patients with spinal injury.
- Patinets with fracture rib.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Assiut University hospital
Asyut, Egypt
Related Publications (5)
Lopez E, Sahni R, Cooper M, Shalaby M. Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Procedural Anesthesia for Pigtail Tube Thoracostomy: A Case Series. Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med. 2025 Jan;9(1):5-9. doi: 10.5811/cpcem.21251.
PMID: 39903631BACKGROUNDReeves MT, Lee Y, Shalaby M. Ultrasound-Guided Truncal Blocks for Tube Thoracostomy Analgesia in the Emergency Department. J Emerg Med. 2026 May;84:92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.12.026. Epub 2026 Jan 2.
PMID: 41936304BACKGROUNDRech MA, Griggs C, Lovett S, Motov S. Acute pain management in the Emergency Department: Use of multimodal and non-opioid analgesic treatment strategies. Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Aug;58:57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.05.022. Epub 2022 May 22.
PMID: 35636044BACKGROUNDAnderson D, Chen SA, Godoy LA, Brown LM, Cooke DT. Comprehensive Review of Chest Tube Management: A Review. JAMA Surg. 2022 Mar 1;157(3):269-274. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.7050.
PMID: 35080596BACKGROUNDPark BC, Mallemat H. Special Procedures for Pulmonary Disease in the Emergency Department. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2022 Aug;40(3):583-602. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2022.05.009.
PMID: 35953218BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- arwa salah abdelaziz
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 11, 2026
First Posted
September 17, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2029
Last Updated
September 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
all collected IPD