Frankincense Versus Sodium Hypochlorite for Root Canal Disinfection
FSHRCD: RCT
Antibacterial Effectiveness of Frankincense-Based Herbal Irrigant Against Endodontic Microflora Using Real-Time PCR - A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This research study is being done to find out if a natural ingredient called frankincense can clean infected root canals as effectively as the standard cleaning solution currently used in dentistry. When a tooth's nerve dies from infection, dentists use a strong cleaning liquid, called sodium hypochlorite, to kill bacteria inside the tooth before filling it. This liquid works well, but it can sometimes irritate the gums or taste unpleasant. Frankincense, a natural substance long used in Oman, has shown early signs in laboratory studies that it may also fight bacteria effectively, with fewer side effects. In this study, patients needing root canal treatment for an infected, dead tooth will be randomly placed into one of two groups. One group will have their tooth cleaned with the standard liquid. The other group will have their tooth cleaned with the frankincense-based liquid. Before and after cleaning, a small, painless sample will be taken from inside the tooth to measure how much bacteria is present, using a lab test called PCR. The results from both groups will then be compared to see which cleaning liquid removes more bacteria. Patients who are between 18 and 50 years old, and who need root canal treatment for a dead/infected tooth, may be able to join. The study involves no extra visits beyond normal root canal treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for early_phase_1
Started Jan 2027
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 31, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 16, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 19, 2027
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 7, 2027
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 7, 2028
September 22, 2026
September 1, 2026
11 months
August 31, 2026
September 17, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Reduction in Total Bacterial Load
The change in total endodontic bacterial load, measured by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) targeting the universal 16S rRNA gene, calculated as log10(pre-irrigation bacterial load) minus log10(post-irrigation bacterial load). Assessed and compared between the frankincense-based irrigant group and the 3% NaOCl group.
1 hour. First sample will be taken pre-intervention/procedural (before chemo-mechanical preparation) and the second sample will be taken immediately after the intervention (after completion of chemo-mechanical preparation) in the same clinical visit.
Percentage Reduction in Total Bacterial Load Between Groups
Comparison of the percentage reduction in total bacterial load (16S rRNA qPCR) between the frankincense-based irrigant group and the 3% NaOCl group. Time Frame: Within a single clinical visit; pre- to post-irrigation
This can be also referred to as Pre-procedural and post-procedural; the procedure being pulp extirpation followed by irrigation, cleaning and shaping of the rootcanals, within a single clinical visit; 1 hour. Pre-intervention & post-intervention samples
Study Arms (2)
3% Sodium Hypochlorite (Control)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants randomized to this arm will receive standard 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) irrigation, the clinic's current standard-of-care irrigant, prepared according to institutional protocol. Approximately 5 mL of irrigant will be delivered per canal, with 30-60 seconds of activation (manual dynamic or sonic agitation), following standardized access, minimal instrumentation, and pre-irrigation microbiological sampling. A post-irrigation sample will be taken via sterile paper point immediately after irrigation.
Frankincense-Based Herbal Irrigant (Intervention)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants randomized to this arm will receive a standardized frankincense-based irrigant (Boswellia sacra-derived extract), formulated at a fixed concentration and pH, with batch sterility and endotoxin testing and stability/compatibility testing completed prior to clinical use. Approximately 5 mL of irrigant will be delivered per canal, with 30-60 seconds of activation (manual dynamic or sonic agitation, final protocol to be fixed prior to trial start), using the same standardized volume, activation method, and contact time as the control arm, following standardized access, minimal instrumentation, and pre-irrigation microbiological sampling. A post-irrigation sample will be taken via sterile paper point immediately after irrigation.
Interventions
Standard-of-care root canal irrigant used as the active comparator. A 3% aqueous sodium hypochlorite solution, prepared per institutional protocol, delivered at approximately 5 mL per canal with 30-60 seconds of activation (manual dynamic or sonic agitation).
Investigational root canal irrigant consisting of a standardized Boswellia sacra (frankincense) extract formulation, adjusted to a fixed concentration and pH, with batch sterility and endotoxin testing and stability/compatibility testing completed prior to clinical use. Delivered at approximately 5 mL per canal with 30-60 seconds of activation (manual dynamic or sonic agitation), matching the control arm's volume, activation method, and contact time so that the irrigant itself is the only planned difference between groups.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-50 years
- Diagnosis of pulpal necrosis (single- or multi-rooted tooth), with or without apical periodontitis
- Tooth suitable for standard endodontic access and microbiological sampling
You may not qualify if:
- Periodontal pockets \>4 mm
- Calcified canals
- Acute apical abscess
- Internal resorption
- Open apex
- Retreatment cases
- Antibiotic/ herbal therapy within the prior 3 months
- Pregnancy
- Systemic comorbidities
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Oman Dental Collegelead
- IMU University, Malaysiacollaborator
- Sultan Qaboos Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Oman dental college
Muscat, 111, Oman
Related Publications (10)
Gutmann JL, Manjarres V. Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on the Microbiological Aspects of Endodontics. Dent J (Basel). 2018 Sep 22;6(4):49. doi: 10.3390/dj6040049.
PMID: 30249009BACKGROUNDPalwankar D, Garg A, Tandan M, Bhasin P, Sachdeva A, Palwankar P. Antimicrobial efficacy of two commercially available herbal products with and without ultrasonic activation in primary endodontic infections: A randomized clinical trial. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Mar;27(3):305-309. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_308_23. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
PMID: 38634027BACKGROUNDDas A, et al. Comparative evaluation of herbal irrigants on root canal microflora: a clinical study. J Conserv Dent. 2024;27(2):120-126.
BACKGROUNDAlmohareb RA, et al. Antibacterial efficacy of frankincense extract against Enterococcus faecalis: an in vitro study. Saudi Dent J. 2025;37(1):45-52.
BACKGROUNDDi Stefano M, et al. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of Boswellia sacra essential oils. Microorganisms. 2020;8(6):984.
BACKGROUNDAbushouk S, Lundy F, Linden G, Abdel Hamid MM, Ibrahim Y, El Karim I. Quantitative Analysis of Candidate Endodontic Pathogens and Their Association with Cause and Symptoms of Apical Periodontitis in a Sudanese Population. Eur Endod J. 2021 Apr;6(1):50-55. doi: 10.14744/eej.2020.52297. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
PMID: 33762533BACKGROUNDZhang D, Shen Y, de la Fuente-Nunez C, Haapasalo M. In vitro evaluation by quantitative real-time PCR and culturing of the effectiveness of disinfection of multispecies biofilms in root canals by two irrigation systems. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Feb;23(2):913-920. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2515-x. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
PMID: 29948281BACKGROUNDSwimberghe RCD, Coenye T, De Moor RJG, Meire MA. Biofilm model systems for root canal disinfection: a literature review. Int Endod J. 2019 May;52(5):604-628. doi: 10.1111/iej.13050. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
PMID: 30488449BACKGROUNDSiqueira JF Jr, Rocas IN. Present status and future directions: Microbiology of endodontic infections. Int Endod J. 2022 May;55 Suppl 3:512-530. doi: 10.1111/iej.13677. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
PMID: 34958494BACKGROUNDCai C, Chen X, Li Y, Jiang Q. Advances in the Role of Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigant in Chemical Preparation of Root Canal Treatment. Biomed Res Int. 2023 Jan 13;2023:8858283. doi: 10.1155/2023/8858283. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 36685672BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Triveni Mohan Nalawade
Oman Dental College
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Laboratory personnel performing qPCR analysis and the data analyst are blinded to group allocation via coded study/sample identifiers. The allocation key is held by an independent study coordinator/statistician not involved in clinical procedures and released only after data lock. Clinicians and participants cannot be blinded due to visible/olfactory differences between irrigants."
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 31, 2026
First Posted
September 16, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
January 19, 2027
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 7, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 7, 2028
Last Updated
September 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data privacy of the patients. Patient data privacy is essential in dentistry to protect sensitive personal and medical information from unauthorized access or misuse. Dental professionals handle records such as medical histories, treatment plans, and personal details, making confidentiality a key responsibility. Information should only be accessed by authorized staff and shared only with patient consent or legal obligation. With digital records, strong security measures are vital, including encryption, secure systems, and controlled access. Regular staff training helps prevent data breaches and accidental disclosure. Legal frameworks such as HIPAA and GDPR ensure that patient information is handled responsibly and securely.Patients also have rights to access, review, and request corrections to their data, promoting transparency and trust. Overall, maintaining data privacy ensures ethical practice and strengthens patient confidence in us.