Personalized Exercise Recommendations for Chronic Pelvic Pain Using Reinforcement Learning
WorkoutCPP
WorkoutCPP: A Pilot Series of N-of-1 Trials Evaluating RL-Generated Adaptive Exercise Recommendations for Pelvic Pain Management
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
WorkoutCPP is a pilot study evaluating the feasibility of a personalized exercise recommendation system for individuals with chronic pelvic pain disorders (CPPDs). The study uses reinforcement learning (RL), a type of artificial intelligence that adapts recommendations over time based on each participant's reported pain levels, symptom burden, and exercise compliance. Participants receive daily exercise recommendations that alternate between standard, non-personalized guidance and personalized, RL-generated recommendations across four 2-week phases, allowing within-person comparison of outcomes under each condition. The primary hypothesis is that an RL-based adaptive recommendation system is feasible to deliver in a CPPD population.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 6, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 3, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 9, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2027
September 9, 2026
September 1, 2026
1.5 years
September 3, 2026
September 3, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Exercise Recommendation Adherence Rate
Exercise recommendation adherence rate is calculated by the proportion of daily exercise recommendations completed over the course of the intervention. A higher exercise adherence rate indicates that participants are completing their given exercise recommendations at higher frequencies.
At 9 weeks at study completion
Participant Retention Rate
Participant retention rate is the proportion of enrolled participants completing study participation until the end of intervention. A higher retention rate indicates that participants complete the 9-week intervention period at higher frequencies.
At 9 weeks at study completion
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Reinforcement Learning Agent Action Entropy Over Time
At 9 weeks at study completion
Study Arms (2)
RL-based personalized phase
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive RL-generated personalized exercise recommendations, which are generated using the list from the initial participant intake form indicating their capacity and resources for carrying out various modalities and intensities of physical activity. The RL agent learns from the participant feedback to update the update the subsequent recommendations.
Standard (Generic) Exercise Arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive standardized, non-personalized exercise recommendations based on the U.S. Physical Activity Guidelines, in 2-week blocks. This comparison will serve as the "active control" arm to which the experimental RL arm will be compared. This type of control condition was selected to provide a more rigorous test of the experimental condition.
Interventions
Participants receive exercise recommendations from a standardized, set list of exercise recommendations that are based on USDHHS physical activity guidelines (Piercy et al., 2020). Recommendations are not personalized based on participant contextual information and do not adapt over the course of the study.
Daily exercise recommendations (using type, intensity, and duration) are generated by a contextual bandit reinforcement learning agent, based on the implementation described in Meier et al. 2023. Recommendations are personalized using each participant's initially generated list of exercises based on their physical ability and resources available, as well as contextual daily factors including pain symptoms, prior exercise compliance, and their feedback to the previous exercise recommendation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Self-reported CPPD (e.g., endometriosis, adenomyosis, fibroids, etc.) based on clinician diagnosis
- Aged 18-55 years.
- Ownership of an iOS or Android smartphone.
- Willingness to self-track daily symptoms, exercise activities, and self-management behaviors using a smartphone research app.
- Willingness to wear an activity tracker for the study duration.
- Willingness to follow exercise recommendations from a smartphone research app, provided no adverse symptoms occur.
- Ability to read and write in English sufficient to understand study materials and communications.
- At least intermittently physically active (e.g., ≥30 minutes of walking twice per week).
You may not qualify if:
- Absolute contraindications to PA (e.g., recent myocardial infarction, complete heart block, acute congestive heart failure, unstable angina, or uncontrolled severe hypertension, BP ≥180/110 mm Hg).
- More than two "Yes" responses on the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q) (16) without physician clearance.
- Major life events expected during the next 10 weeks (e.g., pregnancy, planned surgery, or extended travel likely to interfere with participation).
- Current or planned pregnancy within the next 6 months.
- Having given birth in the past 6 months or currently nursing.
- Inability to wear an activity tracker or use the app for the study duration.
- Complete inactivity (i.e., \<60 minutes of moderate-intensity PA per week).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, 10029, United States
Related Publications (5)
Ensari I, Lipsky-Gorman S, Horan EN, Bakken S, Elhadad N. Associations between physical exercise patterns and pain symptoms in individuals with endometriosis: a cross-sectional mHealth-based investigation. BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 18;12(7):e059280. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059280.
PMID: 35851021BACKGROUNDPiercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM, Carlson SA, Fulton JE, Galuska DA, George SM, Olson RD. The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. JAMA. 2018 Nov 20;320(19):2020-2028. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14854.
PMID: 30418471BACKGROUNDHirten RP, Danieletto M, Landell K, Zweig M, Golden E, Orlov G, Rodrigues J, Alleva E, Ensari I, Bottinger E, Nadkarni GN, Fuchs TJ, Fayad ZA. Development of the ehive Digital Health App: Protocol for a Centralized Research Platform. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 16;12:e49204. doi: 10.2196/49204.
PMID: 37971801BACKGROUNDKrasny-Pacini A, Evans J. Single-case experimental designs to assess intervention effectiveness in rehabilitation: A practical guide. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 May;61(3):164-179. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
PMID: 29253607BACKGROUNDRabbi M, Aung MS, Gay G, Reid MC, Choudhury T. Feasibility and Acceptability of Mobile Phone-Based Auto-Personalized Physical Activity Recommendations for Chronic Pain Self-Management: Pilot Study on Adults. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 26;20(10):e10147. doi: 10.2196/10147.
PMID: 30368433BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ipek Ensari, PhD
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stefan Konigorski, PhD
Department of Computational Precision Nutrition, German Institute of Human Nutrition
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants are blinded to their assigned study phase (active control: generic exercise recommendations vs. experimental: RL-generated adaptive recommendations) and are not informed of the phase sequence or their current assignment at any point during the study. However, participants may be able to infer their assigned phase over time based on the nature of the recommendations received. Study investigators and the data analysis team are not blinded to phase assignment.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 3, 2026
First Posted
September 9, 2026
Study Start
February 6, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2027
Last Updated
September 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared, in order to protect participant privacy and confidentiality, consistent with the IRB guidelines and informed consent form under which participants were enrolled.