Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Pelvic Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation in Stroke Patient
Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Pelvic Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation on Trunk Control, Balance and Functional Mobility in Stroke Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability and commonly results in impaired trunk control, postural instability, balance deficits, and reduced functional mobility due to disrupted sensorimotor integration, impaired proprioceptive processing, and decreased cortical excitability. Trunk control is a key determinant of balance, gait performance, and functional independence, making it a critical target in stroke rehabilitation. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) enhances cortical excitability and promotes neuroplasticity through a top-down mechanism, while Pelvic Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) improves trunk-pelvic control, weight shifting, and sensorimotor integration through a bottom-up proprioceptive facilitation mechanism. Emerging evidence suggests that combining tDCS with Pelvic PNF may improve trunk function and mobility in stroke survivors, supporting the concept of synergistic neuromodulation and motor facilitation. Despite the documented benefits of tDCS and Pelvic PNF individually, the combined application of these interventions remains insufficiently explored, particularly in subacute stroke patients. Most previous studies have focused on gait training, robotic rehabilitation, or other task-oriented interventions, with limited emphasis on trunk-focused pelvic PNF and postural control outcomes. Furthermore, few high-quality randomized controlled trials have evaluated whether simultaneous targeting of central neuroplasticity and peripheral proprioceptive facilitation provides superior improvements in trunk control, balance, and functional mobility. Therefore, this study aims to address this important clinical and methodological gap by investigate the combining effect of Pelvic PNF and tDCS, potentially establishing an evidence-based rehabilitation strategy that optimizes functional recovery after stroke.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke
Started Jul 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 23, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 2, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 9, 2026
CompletedSeptember 9, 2026
September 1, 2026
1 month
September 2, 2026
September 2, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Trunk impairement scale
Trunk impairment scale evaluates static and dynamic trunk balance and trunk coordination. These tasks are design to reflect the patient's ability to activate trunk musculature, which is often impaired after stroke. It evaluates three components: static sitting balance (score range 0-7), dynamic sitting balance (0-10), and trunk coordination (0-6). The total score ranges from 0 to 23, with higher scores indicating better trunk performance.
[Time Frame: baseline, week 6 and week 12]
Berg Balance Scale
The BBS is a 14-item ordinal scale that measures balance performance during functional tasks such as sitting, standing, and weight shifting. Each item is rate on a 5-point scale (0-4), with a maximum total score of 56. Higher scores indicate better balance ability. It has excellent inter-rater reliability, with ICC values of 0.989. Concurrent validity (r = 0.970). Interpretation of 0 to 20 (High Risk): Severe balance impairment; patients typically require a wheelchair for mobility and significant assistance. 21 to 40 (Moderate Risk): Increased fall risk; these individuals typically require walking aids and environmental modifications. 41 to 56 (Low Risk): Good balance function with minimal fall risk.
baseline, week 6 and week 12
Time up and go test
This test measures functional mobility and fall risk by timing the patient as they rise from a chair, walk a short distance, turn around, return, and sit down. The time taken is record in seconds and categorized into normal mobility, low, moderate, or high fall. Reliability ICC for the TUG were 0.998 and 0.992
baseline, week 6 and week 12
Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) for the lower extremity
This scale measure the motor control in stroke patients. FMA consists of 17 items, with a maximum total score of 34 points. Each task is rate on a 3-point ordinal scale. 0: Movement cannot be performed, 1: Movement can be performed partially, 2: Movement can be performed fully. The higher the score, the better your motor recovery. The scores indicate: 0-10: Severe motor impairment, 11-23: Moderate motor impairment, 24-33: Mild motor impairment, 34: Minimal to no impairment (full motor recovery). Reliability, with Intra-class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) values 0.90 to 0.97 high inter-and intra-rater reliability (ICC \> 0.90) for the total FMA-LL score.
baseline, week 6 and week12
Study Arms (3)
Experimental: Pelvic PNF and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Routine Physical therapy
EXPERIMENTALgroup A will receive pelvic propriceptive neuromuscualar facilitation and transcranial direct current stimulation with routine physical therapy. The participants will receive 20 min session of transcranial direct current stimulation with intensity of 2 mA in which anodal tDCS applied over ipsilateral side. Then 20 min session of pelvic PNF will perform with 10 repitition per set for 3 set. pelvic PNF pattern perform as anterior elevation and posterior elevation using rthymic initiation, slow reversal and stabilizing reversal will perform, Then perform routine therapy as ROM, Bridging, trunk flexion and swiss ball perform for 20 minutre.
Experimental: Pelvic Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and Routine Physical Therapy
EXPERIMENTALGroup B will receive pelvic proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation with routine physical therapy. In this group patient receive 20 min session of pelvic PNF with 10 repititions per set for 3 set per session apply moderate manual resistance according to patient tolerance. Patient should be in side lying position then apply PNF pattern as anterior and posterior elevation using rthymic initiation , slow reversal and stabilizing reversal. the routine physical therapy involve 20 repetition with moderate intensity with 3 sessions per week it involve the ROM, bridging, trunk flexion and exercise on swiss ball.
Experimental: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Routine Physical Therapy
EXPERIMENTALGroup C will receive transcranial direct current stimulation and routine physical therapy. The participants will receive 20 min session. tDCS pads will soaked in saline and then apply to patients head. Anodal tDCS apply over ipsilesional side with current of 2mA with 30 second ramp up and down in the begining and end of stimulation. the routine physical therapy involve 20 repetition with moderate intensity with 3 sessions per week it involve the ROM, bridging, trunk flexion and exercise on swiss ball.
Interventions
The PNF treatment will be perform at a dosage of 10 repetitions per set, with 3sets per session, conducted 3 sessions per week over a duration of 12 weeks. Each session lasted 20 minutes, depending on the participant's endurance and response to therapy. The treatment will performed on the affected side, with the hips flexed to 100° and the knees flexed to 45°. For anterior elevation, the therapist's hands will placed just on the subject's anterior iliac spine, and for posterior depression, they will placed on the patient's ischial tuberosity. "Pull up" for anterior elevation, and "push down" and "sit into my hands" for posterior depression. Rhythmic initiation, Slow reversal and stabilizing reversal will used. routine physical therapy involve Sitting posture exercises as controlled forward flexion, trunk rotation to right and left. Supine position exercises as hip roll to both sides, bridging exercise Dynamic sitting exercise on swiss ball as controlled lateral weight shifting.
The patients will sit comfortably on a chair, with their hip and knee joints positioned at 90 degrees and their forearms resting on a table in front of the chair. For the groups receiving tDCS, a wireless rechargeable tDCS device will use. This device use two 5-7 cm-long sponge electrodes that will soak in 0.9% saline. The electrodes will be carefully wrap around the patient's head. The brain remains excited for up to 20 min following tDCS. The tDCS will administered at a intensity of 2 mA, for 20 min, with a 30 sec ramp-up and ramp-down at the beginning and end of stimulation. routine physical therapy involve Sitting posture exercises as controlled forward flexion, trunk rotation to right and left. Supine position exercises as hip roll to both sides, bridging exercise Dynamic sitting exercise on swiss ball as controlled lateral weight shifting for 20 min duration
The patients will sit comfortably on a chair, with their hip and knee joints positioned at 90 degrees and their forearms resting on a table in front of the chair. For the groups receiving tDCS, a wireless rechargeable tDCS device will use. This device use two 5-7 cm-long sponge electrodes that will soak in 0.9% saline. The electrodes will be carefully wrap around the patient's head. The brain remains excited for up to 20 min following tDCS. The tDCS will administered at a intensity of 2 mA, for 20 min, with a 30 sec ramp-up and ramp-down at the beginning and end of stimulation. The PNF will be perform at 10 repetitions per set, with 3sets per session, conducted 3 sessions per week over a duration of 12 weeks. Each session lasted 20 min. Pelvic PNF pattern as anterior elevation and posterior elevation using rthymic initiation and slow reversal. RPT include ROM, trunk flexion, bridging and swiss ball exercises.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Both genders
- Middle Cerebral Artery Ischemic Stroke
- Subacute phase of stroke
- Patients experiencing their first ever stroke
- Brunnstrom stage 3
- Patients is capable to follow commands
You may not qualify if:
- Frequent seizures or epileptic disorder
- Contractures in the spine and lower limb
- Patients with uncontrolled medical conditions e.g. severe musculoskeletal pain, uncontrolled heart disease, uncontrolled hypertension
- Metallic implant
- History of brain tumor, orthopedic, neurosurgical surgery
- Concurrent participation in another clinical trial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dr Salma Physiotherapy Department Psrd Hospital 042-37423455
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan
Related Publications (2)
El-Sherbini AEIEM, Elgayar SL, Elhamrawy MY, Youssef TM. Unlocking trunk potential after stroke: a novel approach combining transcranial direct current stimulation and core stability exercise: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2026 Apr 10;23(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12984-026-01949-0.
PMID: 41964055BACKGROUNDBoob MA, Kovela RK. Effectiveness of Pelvic Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Techniques on Balance and Gait Parameters in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Cureus. 2022 Oct 24;14(10):e30630. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30630. eCollection 2022 Oct.
PMID: 36426303BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
psrd hospital
Pakistan Society for Rehabilitation of Disabled Hospital Lahore
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This study will use assessor blinding design in which outcome assessor will be unaware to group allocation throughout all assessment and will not involve in performing intervention. Blinding of participants and treating therapist is not possible due to nature of the intervention. To minimize potential bias, outcome assessment will be conduct by a blinded assessor using standardized assessment procedures and protocols.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 2, 2026
First Posted
September 9, 2026
Study Start
July 23, 2026
Primary Completion
September 1, 2026
Study Completion
September 1, 2026
Last Updated
September 9, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share