Color Stability and Fluorescence Properties of Two Aligner Attachment Composites
Evaluation of Fluorescent Properties and Color Stability of 2 Different Composite Materials Used For Clear Aligner Attachments
1 other identifier
interventional
37
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This split mouth study aims to evaluate whether 2 different composite materials used for making clear aligner attachments change color over time and do they have different fluorescent characteristics when illuminated with ultraviolet light. While bonding the attachments, a coin toss will determine which composite resin will be used for upper right segment. The remaining quadrants will be bonded with alternating composite resin. After bonding extraoral photographs under ultraviolet light with cheek retractors will be taken for fluorescence evaluation. Intraoral scans will be performed immediately after bonding and every two months up to six months for evaluating color change.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 21, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 6, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 6, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 2, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 8, 2026
CompletedSeptember 8, 2026
September 1, 2026
1.2 years
September 2, 2026
September 2, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Within-patient difference between composites in ΔE₀₀(color difference)
Shade codes acquired with scanner software was converted to CIE L\*, a\*, b\* values using the table published by Budde et al(2024). Color change from beginning to 6 months was calculated using CIEDE2000 formula.
From initial treatment to six months
Within-patient difference between materials in fluorescent contrast
Extraoral photographs under ultraviolet light were analysed in Adobe Photoshop 2020 (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). The L\* coordinate was recorded using the colour sampler at the geometric centre of each attachment and at the centre of adjacent unbonded enamel on the same tooth. Fluorescent contrast was defined as ΔL\* = L\*attachment - L\*enamel.
Baseline
Study Arms (2)
Upper Right Segment GC
EXPERIMENTALPatient's upper right segment will be bonded with GC Aligner Connect. Upper left VOCO, lower left GC, lower right VOCO.
Upper Right Segment VOCO
EXPERIMENTALPatient's upper right segment will be bonded with VOCO AlignerFlow LC. Upper left GC, lower left VOCO, lower right GC.
Interventions
Patient's upper right segment will be bonded with GC Aligner Connect. Upper left VOCO, lower left GC, lower right VOCO.
Patient's upper right segment will be bonded with VOCO AlignerFlow LC. Upper left GC, lower left VOCO, lower right GC.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Receiving Invisalign treatment at the Clinic of the Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University
- Mild to moderate crowding
- Exhibiting good oral hygiene
- No active dental caries
- Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study and signing the written informed consent form
- Having no history of any syndrome, systemic disease, or allergy
You may not qualify if:
- Being pregnant or lactating
- Presenting with advanced periodontal disease of a severity that could affect orthodontic treatment
- Having prosthetic restorations within the oral cavity
- Presenting with white spot lesions prior to orthodontic treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Orthodontics
Istanbul, 34854, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Ercin O, Kurnaz M, Kopuz D. Evaluation of the color stability of attachments made with different resin composites. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023 Oct;164(4):e121-e128. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.07.008. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
PMID: 37565944BACKGROUNDBudde N, Arnold C, Wienke A, Schweyen R. Comparison of the Clinical Evaluation of Digital Tooth Shade Determination Using an Intraoral Scanner with Proven Subjective and Objective Methods. J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 6;13(22):6668. doi: 10.3390/jcm13226668.
PMID: 39597813BACKGROUNDAlbertini P, Tauro R, Barbara L, Albertini E, Lombardo L. Fluorescence-aided removal of orthodontic composites: an in vivo comparative study. Prog Orthod. 2022 May 23;23(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40510-022-00411-w.
PMID: 35599253BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hanife Nuray Yılmaz, Associate Professor
Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Orthodontics
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- DDS
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 2, 2026
First Posted
September 8, 2026
Study Start
April 21, 2025
Primary Completion
July 6, 2026
Study Completion
July 6, 2026
Last Updated
September 8, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09