NCT07800741

Brief Summary

Pulmonary atelectasis and loss of lung aeration are common complications following cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and are associated with impaired oxygenation and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Diaphragm dysfunction occurring in the perioperative period may further delay extubation and prolong intensive care unit (ICU) stay. Flow-Controlled Ventilation (FCV) is a novel ventilation modality that provides continuous, flow-based delivery of tidal breaths with a triangular flow profile, potentially offering superior dynamic compliance optimisation compared to conventional Pressure-Controlled Ventilation (PCV).

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
154

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease

Timeline
27mo left

Started Sep 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress1%
Sep 2026Dec 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 30, 2026

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 2, 2026

Completed
28 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 30, 2026

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2028

Expected
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2028

Last Updated

September 2, 2026

Status Verified

August 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

August 30, 2026

Last Update Submit

August 30, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Flow-Controlled VentilationPressure-Controlled VentilationLung UltrasoundDiaphragm UltrasonographyDiaphragm ExcursionDiaphragm Thickening FractionLung-Protective VentilationPoint-of-Care UltrasoundPerioperative Pulmonary ComplicationsCardiopulmonary BypassCardiac Surgery

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Total Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS)

    Lung aeration assessed using a 12-zone bilateral ultrasonography protocol. Each zone scored 0-3 (0 = normal aeration with A-lines; 1 = multiple B-lines; 2 = coalescent B-lines; 3 = consolidation). Total score ranges from 0 to 36; higher scores indicate greater aeration loss

    Preoperatively (T0), within 30 minutes of sternal closure while intubated (T1), and 24 hours postoperatively after extubation (T2)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Diaphragm Thickening Fraction (TFdi)

    Preoperatively (T0), within 30 minutes of sternal closure while intubated (T1), and 24 hours postoperatively after extubation (T2)

  • Diaphragm Excursion

    Preoperatively (T0), within 30 minutes of sternal closure while intubated (T1), and 24 hours postoperatively after extubation (T2)

  • PaO₂/FiO₂ Ratio

    Preoperatively (T0), within 30 minutes of sternal closure while intubated (T1), and 24 hours postoperatively after extubation (T2)

  • Postoperative Pulmonary Complications

    Up to 30 days postoperatively

Study Arms (2)

FCV (Flow-Controlled Ventilation)

EXPERIMENTAL

Intraoperative ventilation with a Flow-Controlled Ventilation device. Target tidal volume: 6-8 mL/kg ideal body weight (IBW). PEEP and peak airway pressure titrated to maximise dynamic compliance. Respiratory rate adjusted to maintain EtCO₂ 35-45 mmHg. FiO₂ targeted to SpO₂ ≥94%.

Procedure: Pressure-Controlled Ventilation (PCV)

PCV (Pressure-Controlled Ventilation)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Intraoperative pressure-controlled ventilation. Inspiratory pressure adjusted to deliver a tidal volume of 6-8 mL/kg IBW. PEEP titrated to maximise dynamic compliance, using the same algorithm as the FCV group. Respiratory rate adjusted to maintain EtCO₂ 35-45 mmHg. FiO₂ targeted to SpO₂ ≥94%.

Procedure: Flow-Controlled Ventilation

Interventions

FCV delivers tidal ventilation via a continuous triangular flow waveform, maintaining constant inspiratory and expiratory flow rates throughout the entire respiratory cycle. PEEP and peak airway pressure are titrated independently, guided by dynamic respiratory system compliance. Tidal volume target is 6-8 mL/kg ideal body weight. This ventilation modality is distinct from pressure-controlled and volume-controlled modes, which generate decelerating inspiratory flow profiles and do not allow simultaneous independent titration of PEEP and peak airway pressure based on compliance.

PCV (Pressure-Controlled Ventilation)

PCV is delivered using a standard anaesthesia workstation in pressure-controlled mode. Inspiratory pressure is set to achieve a tidal volume of 6-8 mL/kg ideal body weight. PEEP is titrated using the same compliance-guided algorithm applied in the FCV arm. Unlike FCV, the inspiratory flow profile is decelerating and PEEP and peak airway pressure are not independently optimised in a compliance-guided manner within the same ventilation mode

FCV (Flow-Controlled Ventilation)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Planned elective isolated on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery
  • ASA Physical Status Classification II-IV
  • Written informed consent obtained
  • Technically adequate acoustic window for lung and diaphragm ultrasonography

You may not qualify if:

  • Emergency surgery
  • Combined surgical procedures (e.g., valve repair/replacement + CABG)
  • Preoperative requirement for invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation
  • Known diaphragm paralysis or neuromuscular disease
  • Severe COPD exacerbation or active pneumonia at time of surgery
  • Body mass index ≥40 kg/m²
  • Inability to obtain standard lung or diaphragm ultrasound images due to pleural effusion, thoracic deformity, or prior thoracic surgery

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kosuyolu Heart Training and Research Hospital

Istanbul, Kartal, 34862, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery DiseasePulmonary AtelectasisRespiratory Insufficiency

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular DiseasesLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesRespiration Disorders

Study Officials

  • Ebru GIRGIN DINC

    Koşuyolu Kartal Heart Training and Research Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Ebru GIRGIN DINC, M.D., DESAIC

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Complete blinding of the anaesthesia care provider is not achievable given the distinct operational characteristics of the FCV device versus a standard ventilator in PCV mode. Accordingly, a single-blind (outcomes assessor-blinded) design is employed. A dedicated assessor, unaware of group assignment, performs all lung and diaphragm ultrasound examinations at each time point (T0, T1, T2) and scores the images offline using coded identifiers. The assessor has no access to the ventilator display, the anaesthesia record, or any clinical documentation that could reveal group allocation. To quantify inter-rater reliability, the first ten subjects are independently scored by two blinded assessors; disagreements exceeding one point per zone are resolved by consensus before proceeding.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This is a single-centre, prospective, randomised, parallel-group controlled trial comparing two intraoperative ventilation strategies - Flow-Controlled Ventilation (FCV) and Pressure-Controlled Ventilation (PCV) - in adults undergoing elective isolated on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. A parallel-group design was selected because the two ventilation modes are mutually exclusive within a single surgical procedure; crossover is not feasible.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
M.D., DESAIC

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 30, 2026

First Posted

September 2, 2026

Study Start

September 30, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2028

Last Updated

September 2, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-08

Locations