Flow-Controlled vs. Pressure-Controlled Ventilation in CABG: Effects on Lung Aeration and Diaphragm Function
FCV-PCV-DTI-LU
Comparison of Flow-Controlled Ventilation and Pressure-Controlled Ventilation on Lung Aeration and Diaphragm Function in Patients Undergoing Elective Isolated On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Single-Centre Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
154
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pulmonary atelectasis and loss of lung aeration are common complications following cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and are associated with impaired oxygenation and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Diaphragm dysfunction occurring in the perioperative period may further delay extubation and prolong intensive care unit (ICU) stay. Flow-Controlled Ventilation (FCV) is a novel ventilation modality that provides continuous, flow-based delivery of tidal breaths with a triangular flow profile, potentially offering superior dynamic compliance optimisation compared to conventional Pressure-Controlled Ventilation (PCV).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
Started Sep 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 30, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 2, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 30, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2028
September 2, 2026
August 1, 2026
2 years
August 30, 2026
August 30, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Total Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS)
Lung aeration assessed using a 12-zone bilateral ultrasonography protocol. Each zone scored 0-3 (0 = normal aeration with A-lines; 1 = multiple B-lines; 2 = coalescent B-lines; 3 = consolidation). Total score ranges from 0 to 36; higher scores indicate greater aeration loss
Preoperatively (T0), within 30 minutes of sternal closure while intubated (T1), and 24 hours postoperatively after extubation (T2)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Diaphragm Thickening Fraction (TFdi)
Preoperatively (T0), within 30 minutes of sternal closure while intubated (T1), and 24 hours postoperatively after extubation (T2)
Diaphragm Excursion
Preoperatively (T0), within 30 minutes of sternal closure while intubated (T1), and 24 hours postoperatively after extubation (T2)
PaO₂/FiO₂ Ratio
Preoperatively (T0), within 30 minutes of sternal closure while intubated (T1), and 24 hours postoperatively after extubation (T2)
Postoperative Pulmonary Complications
Up to 30 days postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
FCV (Flow-Controlled Ventilation)
EXPERIMENTALIntraoperative ventilation with a Flow-Controlled Ventilation device. Target tidal volume: 6-8 mL/kg ideal body weight (IBW). PEEP and peak airway pressure titrated to maximise dynamic compliance. Respiratory rate adjusted to maintain EtCO₂ 35-45 mmHg. FiO₂ targeted to SpO₂ ≥94%.
PCV (Pressure-Controlled Ventilation)
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntraoperative pressure-controlled ventilation. Inspiratory pressure adjusted to deliver a tidal volume of 6-8 mL/kg IBW. PEEP titrated to maximise dynamic compliance, using the same algorithm as the FCV group. Respiratory rate adjusted to maintain EtCO₂ 35-45 mmHg. FiO₂ targeted to SpO₂ ≥94%.
Interventions
FCV delivers tidal ventilation via a continuous triangular flow waveform, maintaining constant inspiratory and expiratory flow rates throughout the entire respiratory cycle. PEEP and peak airway pressure are titrated independently, guided by dynamic respiratory system compliance. Tidal volume target is 6-8 mL/kg ideal body weight. This ventilation modality is distinct from pressure-controlled and volume-controlled modes, which generate decelerating inspiratory flow profiles and do not allow simultaneous independent titration of PEEP and peak airway pressure based on compliance.
PCV is delivered using a standard anaesthesia workstation in pressure-controlled mode. Inspiratory pressure is set to achieve a tidal volume of 6-8 mL/kg ideal body weight. PEEP is titrated using the same compliance-guided algorithm applied in the FCV arm. Unlike FCV, the inspiratory flow profile is decelerating and PEEP and peak airway pressure are not independently optimised in a compliance-guided manner within the same ventilation mode
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18 years
- Planned elective isolated on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery
- ASA Physical Status Classification II-IV
- Written informed consent obtained
- Technically adequate acoustic window for lung and diaphragm ultrasonography
You may not qualify if:
- Emergency surgery
- Combined surgical procedures (e.g., valve repair/replacement + CABG)
- Preoperative requirement for invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation
- Known diaphragm paralysis or neuromuscular disease
- Severe COPD exacerbation or active pneumonia at time of surgery
- Body mass index ≥40 kg/m²
- Inability to obtain standard lung or diaphragm ultrasound images due to pleural effusion, thoracic deformity, or prior thoracic surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kosuyolu Heart Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Kartal, 34862, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ebru GIRGIN DINC
Koşuyolu Kartal Heart Training and Research Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Complete blinding of the anaesthesia care provider is not achievable given the distinct operational characteristics of the FCV device versus a standard ventilator in PCV mode. Accordingly, a single-blind (outcomes assessor-blinded) design is employed. A dedicated assessor, unaware of group assignment, performs all lung and diaphragm ultrasound examinations at each time point (T0, T1, T2) and scores the images offline using coded identifiers. The assessor has no access to the ventilator display, the anaesthesia record, or any clinical documentation that could reveal group allocation. To quantify inter-rater reliability, the first ten subjects are independently scored by two blinded assessors; disagreements exceeding one point per zone are resolved by consensus before proceeding.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D., DESAIC
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 30, 2026
First Posted
September 2, 2026
Study Start
September 30, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2028
Last Updated
September 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-08