Bone Models Printed With 3D Printer
Investigation of the Effect of Resin Color on Anatomical Accuracy of Bone Models Printed With 3D Printer
1 other identifier
observational
106
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aimed to compare 3D-printed bone models produced using different infill densities and resin colors in terms of weight, anatomical accuracy, level of detail, texture quality, and similarity to real anatomical bone, and to determine the effects of infill density and resin color on perceived anatomical realism.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Oct 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 28, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 1, 2026
CompletedSeptember 1, 2026
March 1, 2026
2 months
August 28, 2026
August 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual Analog Scale
The scale is 10 cm. A value of 0 indicates that the model is not similar to the real thing, while a value of 10 indicates that it is identical to the original model.
once
Study Arms (1)
single group
Participants were asked to examine the structures of real bone models and 3D models printed in different colors in a laboratory setting, and to compare and evaluate the 3D models printed in different colors with the originals. The evaluation was done using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) consisting of 4 questions about the weight, anatomical accuracy, level of detail, and texture quality of the model. Participants were asked to mark their results on a 10 cm straight line. A VAS score of 0 indicated that the model did not resemble real bone, while a score of 10 indicated that it was identical to the original model.
Eligibility Criteria
healthy population
You may qualify if:
- Willingness to participate and provide written informed consent
- Undergraduate students who have taken anatomy courses
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals with a history of traumatic injury to the upper extremity within the last three months
- Sensory deficit in one hand, or scar tissue on the fingertips
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bolu BAant İzzet Baysal University
Bolu, Bolu, 14030, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Kurul R, Inal B, Diramali M, Ozer H, Erdogan KE. Evaluating the educational impact of tomography-based high-resolution 3D-printed distal radius fracture models. BMC Med Educ. 2025 Dec 24;25(1):1706. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-08164-w.
PMID: 41444874BACKGROUNDKurul R, Özdemir D, Erdoğan KE. Can high resolution 3D resin printed models be used in anatomy education? A randomized controlled trial. Anatomy. 2022;16(3):179-84.
BACKGROUNDTulcan A, Vasilescu MD, Tulcan L. Comparative Study of the Influence of Bio-Resin Color on the Dimension, Flatness and Straightness of the Part in the 3D Printing Process. Polymers (Basel). 2021 Apr 27;13(9):1412. doi: 10.3390/polym13091412.
PMID: 33925497BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 28, 2026
First Posted
September 1, 2026
Study Start
October 15, 2025
Primary Completion
November 30, 2025
Study Completion
November 30, 2025
Last Updated
September 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03