NCT07789691

Brief Summary

This study looks at whether Reformer Pilates can help children and adolescents with visual impairment improve their balance, walking patterns, and muscle strength. Participants are between 10 and 17 years old. They are randomly placed into one of two groups: an exercise group or a control group. Those in the exercise group take part in 12 supervised Reformer Pilates sessions over 6 weeks, meeting twice a week. Those in the control group keep up with their usual daily activities and do not join the exercise program during this time. Before and after the 6-week period, researchers measure each participant's balance, walking patterns, and muscle strength. They then compare how much each group changed.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
75

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
4mo left

Started Feb 2025

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress83%
Feb 2025Dec 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 14, 2025

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 24, 2026

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 27, 2026

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2026

Expected
25 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 25, 2026

Last Updated

August 27, 2026

Status Verified

August 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

August 24, 2026

Last Update Submit

August 24, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Pilates (Equipment-Based Pilates)Vestibular ExerciseBalance PerformanceGait BiomechanicsMuscle StrengthChildrenAdolescents

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (18)

  • Static Balance Performance: Center of Pressure Sway Area

    Center of Pressure Sway Area: Static balance performance is assessed using the TekScan pressure platform. Center of pressure (COP) sway area is measured during standardized quiet standing and expressed in square centimeters (cm²) and Higher values indicate greater postural sway.

    Baseline and post-intervention at Week 6

  • Static Balance Performance: Center of Pressure Path Length

    Center of pressure path length is measured using the TekScan pressure platform during quiet standing, representing the total displacement distance of the center of pressure, expressed in centimeters (cm).

    Baseline and post-intervention at Week 6

  • Static Balance Performance: Antero-posterior Center of Pressure Excursion

    Anteroposterior center of pressure excursion is measured using the TekScan pressure platform during quiet standing, representing postural sway in the forward-backward direction, expressed in centimeters (cm).

    Baseline and post-intervention at Week 6

  • Static Balance Performance: Mediolateral Center of Pressure Excursion

    Medio-lateral center of pressure excursion is measured using the TekScan pressure platform during quiet standing, representing postural sway in the side-to-side direction, expressed in centimeters (cm).

    Baseline and post-intervention at Week 6

  • Gait - Spatiotemporal:Walking Speed

    Walking speed is assessed using the STT-WS inertial measurement unit system during the walking test and it is expressed in meters per second (m/s).

    Baseline and post-intervention at Week 6

  • Gait - Spatiotemporal: Gait Cadence

    Gait cadence is assessed using the STT-WS system and it represents the average number of steps taken per minute during walking.

    Baseline and post-intervention at Week 6

  • Gait - Spatiotemporal: Step Length and Stride Length During Gait

    Step length and stride length are assessed using the STT-WS inertial measurement unit system during walking, expressed in meters (m). Step length represents the average distance between consecutive foot contacts of opposite feet and stride length represents the average distance between successive contacts of the same foot.

    Baseline and post-intervention at Week 6

  • Pelvic Symmetry

    Pelvic symmetry during gait is assessed using the STT-WS system and it is expressed as a percentage (%).

    Baseline and post-intervention at Week 6

  • Gait: Stance and Swing Phase Duration

    During Gait Stance and swing phase durations are assessed bilaterally using the STT-WS system. Stance phase represents the portion of the gait cycle during which the foot is in contact with the ground, and swing phase represents the portion during which the foot is not in contact with the ground. Values are recorded separately for the right and left limbs, expressed in seconds and as a percentage of the gait cycle.

    Baseline and post-intervention at Week 6

  • Gait: Double Support Duration During Gait

    Double support duration is assessed bilaterally using the STT-WS system and represents the portion of the gait cycle during which both feet are concurrently in contact with the ground. Values are recorded separately for the right and left limbs, expressed as a percentage of the gait cycle.

    Baseline and post-intervention at Week 6

  • Gait Kinematics: Hip Flexion-Extension Angle During Gait

    Hip flexion and extension angles during the gait cycle are assessed bilaterally using the STT-WS inertial measurement unit system and expressed in degrees (º). Maximum hip flexion angle and minimum hip extension angle are recorded separately for the right and left limbs.

    Baseline and post-intervention at Week 6

  • Gait Kinematics: Hip Flexion-Extension Range of Motion During Gait

    Hip flexion-extension range of motion during the gait cycle is assessed bilaterally using the STT-WS system and expressed in degrees (º),it is recorded separately for the right and left limbs.

    Baseline and post-intervention at Week 6

  • Gait Kinematics: Knee Flexion-Extension Angle During Gait

    Knee flexion and extension angles during the gait cycle are assessed bilaterally using the STT-WS system and expressed in degrees (º). Maximum knee flexion angle and minimum knee extension angle are recorded separately for the right and left limbs.

    Baseline and post-intervention at Week 6

  • Gait Kinematics: Knee Flexion-Extension Range of Motion During Gait

    Knee flexion-extension range of motion during the gait cycle is assessed bilaterally using the STT-WS system and expressed in degrees (º), recorded separately for the right and left limbs.

    Baseline and post-intervention at Week 6

  • Gait Kinematics: Ankle Dorsiflexion-Plantarflexion Angle During Gait

    Ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion angles during the gait cycle are assessed bilaterally using the STT-WS system and expressed in degrees (º). Maximum dorsiflexion angle and minimum plantarflexion angle are recorded separately for the right and left limbs.

    Baseline and post-intervention at Week 6

  • Gait Kinematics: Ankle Dorsiflexion-Plantarflexion Range of Motion During Gait

    Ankle dorsiflexion-plantarflexion range of motion during the gait cycle is assessed bilaterally using the STT-WS system and expressed in degrees (º), it is recorded separately for the right and left limbs.

    Baseline and post-intervention at Week 6

  • Gait Kinematics: Pelvic Tilt Angle During Gait

    Maximum posterior and anterior pelvic tilt angles during the gait cycle are assessed using the STT-WS inertial measurement unit system and expressed in degrees (º), recorded separately as posterior tilt and anterior tilt values.

    Baseline and post-intervention at Week 6

  • Gait Kinematics: Pelvic Tilt Range of Motion

    Pelvic tilt range of motion during the gait cycle is assessed using the STT-WS system, representing the combined anterior (posterior tilt) and interior (anterior tilt) excursion, expressed in degrees (º).

    Baseline and post-intervention at Week 6

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Muscle Strength: Isometric Knee Extensor Muscle Strength

    Baseline and post-intervention at Week 6

  • Muscle Strength: Isometric Knee Flexor Muscle Strength

    Baseline and post-intervention at Week 6

  • Trunk Muscle Endurance: Trunk Extensor Endurance

    Baseline and post-intervention at Week 6

  • Trunk Extensor Endurance

    Baseline and post-intervention at Week 6

Study Arms (3)

Pilates (Equipment-Based Pilates(Reformer)) Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this arm received a supervised Reformer Pilates exercise program twice weekly for 6 weeks, for a total of 12 sessions

Behavioral: Equipment-Based Pilates Exercise (Reformer)

Vestibular Exercise Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this group receive a supervised vestibular balance exercise program for 6 weeks, consisting of 12 sessions (two sessions per week).

Behavioral: Vestibular Exercise Program

Control Group

NO INTERVENTION

Participants in this arm continued their usual daily activities and did not receive either of the study exercise programs during the study period.

Interventions

Participants in this arm attended a supervised Reformer Pilates program, held twice a week for six weeks (12 sessions in total). Sessions were structured around the Reformer apparatus and followed a progressive format, with exercise difficulty gradually increasing as participants advanced through the program.

Pilates (Equipment-Based Pilates(Reformer)) Group

Participants in this arm attended a supervised vestibular balance exercise program, held twice a week for six weeks (12 sessions in total). Exercises were performed under varying sensory conditions and progressed in difficulty as participants advanced through the program.

Vestibular Exercise Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age10 Years - 17 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Children and adolescents aged 10 to 17 years
  • Diagnosis of visual impairment, classified as degree 2 to 5
  • informed consent provided by a parent or legal guardian

You may not qualify if:

  • Presence of an orthopedic disorder affecting balance, gait, or participation in the exercise program
  • Presence of a neurological disorder affecting balance, gait, or participation in the exercise program
  • Use of medications known to affect balance or gait

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Türkan Sabancı Görme Engelliler Okulu

Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Vision Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Sensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesEye DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Selda Uzun, PhD

    Marmara University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
The two research assistants performing outcome measurements were unaware of participants' intervention/control group allocation; however, the principal investigator's involvement, despite being aware of allocation, rendered the study effectively open-label.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2026

First Posted

August 27, 2026

Study Start

February 14, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 25, 2026

Last Updated

August 27, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will not be made available to other researchers. Because the study population consists of children, data sharing is restricted in line with the permission obtained from the Provincial Directorate of National Education. Study results will only be presented in aggregate form, without any information that could identify individual participants.

Locations