Suicide Safety Planning
STAY
Comparing Two Approaches for Assessment and Safety Planning With Adults at Risk for Suicide
2 other identifiers
interventional
176,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn the best way to provide suicide prevention care to adults receiving outpatient mental health care. The study compares two approaches based on the Zero Suicide Framework: Local Care Continuity and Centralized Care Navigation. The main questions the study aims to answer are:
- Does adding support from a centralized telehealth care navigation team reduce suicide attempts compared with providing additional tools and support to local mental health clinicians?
- Does the centralized approach help more patients receive recommended suicide prevention care, including safety planning, and connect with follow-up mental health treatment?
- How do patients experience the two approaches, including their ability to cope with difficult situations and their experiences with their mental health care? Researchers will compare Local Care Continuity, in which suicide prevention care is delivered by patients' local mental health clinicians with additional implementation support, with Centralized Care Navigation, which adds support from a centralized telehealth team of clinicians and care navigators. The researchers expect that Centralized Care Navigation will result in better suicide prevention care, greater connection to follow-up treatment, and fewer suicide attempts than Local Care Continuity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2027
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 20, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 24, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2027
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2030
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2031
August 24, 2026
August 1, 2026
3.3 years
August 20, 2026
August 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Suicide attempt
Suicide attempts will be identified from EHR and claims data using ICD-10 diagnosis codes for intentional self-harm (X60-X84 and Y87.0). Encounter diagnoses for injury or poisoning with modifiers indicating self-harm intent will be classified as suicide attempts. Fatal and non-fatal suicide attempts occurring during the 18-month follow-up period will be included.
From the index outpatient mental health visit through 18 months
Receipt of a safety plan
Receipt of a safety plan will be assessed using text processing of structured and unstructured electronic health record (EHR) documentation. The outcome will indicate whether a patient received a safety plan during the 3-month follow-up period.
From the index outpatient mental health visit through 3 months
Treatment initiation/follow-up
Treatment initiation/follow-up will be assessed using EHR data to determine whether a patient attended a subsequent outpatient mental health visit during the 6-month follow-up period.
From the index outpatient mental health visit through 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Local care continuity
ACTIVE COMPARATORExisting specialty mental health clinicians deliver suicide prevention care, including suicide risk assessment, safety planning, and connection to follow-up care, supported by implementation strategies designed to increase delivery of recommended suicide prevention practices.
Centralized care navigation
EXPERIMENTALA centralized telehealth suicide prevention team works with existing specialty mental health clinicians to provide or facilitate suicide risk assessment, safety planning, and connection to follow-up care. This arm includes the implementation strategies used in Local Care Continuity plus additional support from clinicians and care navigators.
Interventions
Local Care Continuity uses implementation strategies to support existing specialty mental health clinicians in delivering evidence-based suicide prevention care. Implementation strategies include electronic health record tools for suicide risk assessment, safety planning, and follow-up; practice facilitation, including training and troubleshooting; and audit and feedback on delivery of suicide prevention practices. When suicide risk is identified, the local mental health clinician conducts suicide risk assessment, develops a safety plan as clinically indicated, and plans appropriate follow-up care.
Centralized Care Navigation uses the same implementation strategies as Local Care Continuity and adds a centralized telehealth suicide prevention service. The centralized team includes clinicians and non-clinician care navigators who work with local mental health clinicians to provide or facilitate suicide risk assessment and safety planning. When clinically indicated, patients receive a digital safety plan supported by a care navigator. Care navigators provide telehealth follow-up to support safety plan completion and connection to follow-up mental health care and send Caring Contacts from the care team.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or older
- Attending an intake or follow-up outpatient mental health visit at a participating Kaiser Permanente Northern California mental health clinic during the study eligibility period
- Nine months of enrollment in the year prior to index visit, allowing for 1-month gaps
You may not qualify if:
- \) None specified for the overall CE-RCT population
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Kaiser Permanentelead
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institutecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research
Pleasanton, California, 94588, United States
Related Publications (3)
Hsin H, Papini S, Lu Y, Clancy H, Erion M, Lee C, Brochard-Des Roches K, Ju J, Girard K, Koshy M, Awsare S, Sterling SA, Liu VX, Iturralde E. Predicting and Preventing Suicide at Entry to Mental Health Care: A Community-Engaged, Machine Learning Model Implementation. NEJM Catal Innov Care Deliv. 2026 Mar;7(3):CAT250298. doi: 10.1056/CAT.25.0298. Epub 2026 Feb 18.
PMID: 42418608BACKGROUNDAhmedani BK, Penfold RB, Frank C, Richards JE, Stewart C, Boggs JM, Coleman KJ, Sterling S, Yarborough BJH, Clarke G, Schoenbaum M, Aguirre-Miyamoto EM, Barton LJ, Yeh HH, Westphal J, McDonald S, Beck A, Beidas RS, Richardson L, Ryan JM, Buckingham ET 4th, Buttlaire S, Bruschke C, Flores J, Simon GE. Zero Suicide Model Implementation and Suicide Attempt Rates in Outpatient Mental Health Care. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e253721. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.3721.
PMID: 40193074BACKGROUNDAngerhofer Richards J, Cruz M, Stewart C, Lee AK, Ryan TC, Ahmedani BK, Simon GE. Effectiveness of Integrating Suicide Care in Primary Care : Secondary Analysis of a Stepped-Wedge, Cluster Randomized Implementation Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2024 Nov;177(11):1471-1481. doi: 10.7326/M24-0024. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
PMID: 39348695BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Esti M Iturralde, PhD
Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Investigator II
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 20, 2026
First Posted
August 24, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
February 1, 2027
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2030
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 28, 2031
Last Updated
August 24, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-08