Perceptions of High and Low Intensity Speech Intervention in Children With a Cleft Palate
High and Low Intensity Speech Intervention in Children With a Cleft Palate: Perceptions of Children, Their Parents and Speech-language Pathologists
1 other identifier
observational
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A cleft (lip and) palate is the most common congenital abnormality of the face and skull with a significant social impact, affecting speech, hearing, feeding, oral behavior, dentition and satisfaction with appearance. These consequences have a long-term and negative impact on social integration and well-being. The World Health Organization (WHO) highlights the significant financial costs, including morbidity, health care costs, emotional distress and social exclusion for patients, their families and society. The purpose of this study is to compare high- and low-intensity speech intervention in children with a cleft (lip and) palate based on the perceptions of the providers of the intervention (primary care speech-language pathologists) and the recipients of the intervention (children with a cleft (lip and) palate and their parents). Individual semi-structured interviews will be conducted with both intervention providers and recipients to explore perceptions and experiences, as well as acceptability of the two speech intervention intensities. Potential participants will be told that the interview will be recorded. The actual interviews will take place at a location and time that is most convenient for the participants. Each interview will be recorded using a Roland R-05 high-quality audio recorder. After conducting the interviews, all participants will be asked to complete a questionnaire regarding their demographics. In addition, data regarding the type of cleft, time and manner of closure of the cleft, any secondary surgery and otological/audiological data will be collected from the medical records of the children with a cleft (lip and) palate. Based on this qualitative study, possible adjustments to the high-intensity therapy protocol can be made. In doing so, these modifications will be relevant to these key stakeholders. This will also facilitate the implementation and widespread use of high-intensity speech therapy in clinical speech therapy practice.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Mar 2025
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 12, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 24, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
August 24, 2026
August 1, 2026
2.5 years
August 12, 2026
August 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Perceived acceptability of high- and low-intensity speech intervention
Perceptions and experiences of children with cleft palate, their parents/caregivers, and speech-language pathologists regarding the acceptability of high-intensity and low-intensity speech therapy. Acceptability will be explored through semi-structured interviews and examined across the seven constructs of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability: affective attitude, burden, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, perceived effectiveness, and self-efficacy. Qualitative thematic analysis will be used to identify perceptions, experiences, and factors influencing acceptability of the two treatment intensities.
Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Perceived feasibility and burden of high- and low-intensity speech therapy
Day 1
Perceived therapeutic value of high- and low-intensity speech therapy
Day 1
Emotional and motivational experiences of high- and low-intensity speech therapy
Day 1
Treatment preferences and contextual factors influencing acceptability of speech therapy intensity
Day 1
Study Arms (2)
High-intensity speech therapy (HISI)
Participants who received high-intensity speech therapy, consisting of five 30-minute sessions per week during two separate 2-week intervention periods, with a 6-week rest period between intervention periods.
Low-intensity speech therapy (LISI)
Participants who received low-intensity speech therapy, consisting of two 30-minute sessions per week over a 10-week intervention period.
Interventions
High-intensity speech therapy consisted of five 30-minute speech therapy sessions per week over two separate 2-week periods, with a 6-week rest period between the two periods. The intervention comprised a total of 10 hours of speech therapy.
Low-intensity speech therapy consisted of two 30-minute speech therapy sessions per week over a 10-week period. The intervention comprised a total of 10 hours of speech therapy.
Eligibility Criteria
The study population consists of children with cleft palate who participated in the associated randomized clinical trial evaluating high- and low-intensity speech therapy, their parents/caregivers, and the speech-language pathologists who provided the intervention. Participants will be selected from children and families enrolled in the clinical trial and from the speech-language pathologists providing the trial interventions.
You may qualify if:
- Belgian Dutch-speaking children with a cleft palate with or without a cleft lip
- Aged between 4 and 12 years,
- Presence of at least one compensatory speech error in their speech based on the perceptual assessment of one experienced speech-language pathologist
You may not qualify if:
- Children with syndromic clefts
- Oronasal fistula
- Velopharyngeal insufficiency
- Hearing disabilities based on pure tone audiometry (\>25 dB HL)
- Cognitive and/or related learning disabilities or neuromuscular disorders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Ghentlead
- Research Foundation Flanderscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Ghent
Ghent, East-Flanders, 9000, Belgium
Related Publications (6)
Alighieri C, Bettens K, Verbeke J, Van Lierde K. 'Sometimes I feel sad': A qualitative study on children's perceptions with cleft palate speech and language therapy. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Sep-Oct;58(5):1526-1538. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12879. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
PMID: 37072901BACKGROUNDAlighieri C, Bettens K, Verhaeghe S, Van Lierde K. Speech diagnosis and intervention in children with a repaired cleft palate: A qualitative study of Flemish private community speech-language pathologists' practices. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022 Feb;24(1):53-66. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2021.1946153. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
PMID: 34229538BACKGROUNDAlighieri C, Peersman W, Bettens K, Van Herreweghe V, Van Lierde K. Parental perceptions and expectations concerning speech therapy-related cleft care - a qualitative study. J Commun Disord. 2020 Sep-Oct;87:106028. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.106028. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
PMID: 32659479BACKGROUNDAlighieri C, Van Lierde K, Cammu H, Vanoost L, Bettens K. The retrospective acceptability of high intensity versus low intensity speech intervention in children with a cleft palate: A qualitative study from the parents' point of view using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Mar;58(2):326-341. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12788. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
PMID: 36189983BACKGROUNDAlighieri C, Bettens K, Vanoost L, Demuynck K, Verhaeghe S, Van Lierde K. Parents' perceptions on speech therapy delivery models in children with a cleft palate: A mixed methods study. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Dec;151:110958. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110958. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
PMID: 34736010BACKGROUNDAlighieri C, Bettens K, Verhaeghe S, Van Lierde K. From excitement to self-doubt and insecurity: Speech-language pathologists' perceptions and experiences when treating children with a cleft palate. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 Jul;56(4):739-753. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12624. Epub 2021 May 28.
PMID: 34048135BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kristiane Van Lierde, Professor
University Ghent
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 12, 2026
First Posted
August 24, 2026
Study Start
March 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
August 24, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share