NCT07777029

Brief Summary

This study aims to evaluate whether subcutaneous methadone provides postoperative analgesia that is non-inferior to that achieved with intrathecal morphine in women undergoing cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia. The primary outcome will be the quality of postoperative recovery, assessed using the QoR-10 score during the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes will include postoperative pain intensity, opioid consumption, incidence of adverse effects, and maternal satisfaction. This trial seeks to determine whether subcutaneous methadone could represent an alternative analgesic strategy within multimodal analgesia protocols for cesarean delivery.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
128

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
6mo left

Started Aug 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress20%
Aug 2026Mar 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 18, 2026

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 20, 2026

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 21, 2026

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2026

Expected
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2027

Last Updated

August 20, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

August 18, 2026

Last Update Submit

August 18, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

cesarean sectionmethadoneintratecal morphinerecoverymaternal satisfaction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Quality of Recovery-10 (QoR-10) score at 24 hours

    cesarean delivery. The QoR-10 is a validated patient-reported outcome measure ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better recovery. The study is designed to assess noninferiority of subcutaneous methadone compared to intrathecal morphine using a predefined noninferiority margin of 8 points.

    24 hours

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Postoperative pain intensity

    Up to 24 hours after surgery

  • Opioid consumption

    Up to 24 hours after surgery

  • adverse effects

    24 hours

Study Arms (2)

Subcutaneous methadone

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients receive subcutaneous methadone for postoperative analgesia following cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen.

Drug: Methadone 0.15 mg/kg

Intrathecal morphine

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients recieve intrathecal preservative-free morphine for postoperative analgesia following cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen.

Drug: morphine

Interventions

Intrathecal morphine administered during neuraxial anesthesia for postoperative analgesia following cesarean delivery.

Intrathecal morphine

Subcutaneous methadone administered for postoperative analgesia following cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia.

Subcutaneous methadone

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Women aged 18-45 years
  • Singleton pregnancy at term (≥37 weeks of gestation)
  • Scheduled for elective cesarean delivery
  • Planned neuraxial spinal anesthesia
  • Ability to understand and complete the QoR-10 questionnaire
  • Provision of written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Emergency cesarean delivery
  • Contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia
  • Known hypersensitivity or allergy to methadone or morphine
  • Chronic opioid use or opioid dependence

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (3)

  • Crowe G, Atterton B, Roofthooft E, Joshi GP, Rawal N, Wu C, Sauter AR, Bonnet MP, Lucas DN, Van de Velde M; PROSPECT Working Group of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy. Pain management after elective caesarean section under neuraxial anaesthesia: an updated systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) recommendations. Anaesthesia. 2026 Jun;81(6):819-839. doi: 10.1111/anae.70141. Epub 2026 Feb 15.

    PMID: 41693258BACKGROUND
  • Guevara J, Sanchez C, Organista-Montano J, Domingue BW, Guo N, Sultan P. Development and validation of a Spanish version of the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 item score (ObsQoR-10-Spanish). BJA Open. 2024 Mar 21;10:100269. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100269. eCollection 2024 Jun.

    PMID: 38560622BACKGROUND
  • Russell T, Mitchell C, Paech MJ, Pavy T. Efficacy and safety of intraoperative intravenous methadone during general anaesthesia for caesarean delivery: a retrospective case-control study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2013 Jan;22(1):47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Dec 7.

    PMID: 23219678BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

MethadoneMorphine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

KetonesOrganic ChemicalsMorphine DerivativesMorphinansOpiate AlkaloidsAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, Bridged-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingPhenanthrenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPolycyclic Compounds

Central Study Contacts

JAVIERA VARGAS, MD, MSc

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A sample size calculation was performed for a non-inferiority study with two parallel groups and 1:1 allocation, using the total Obs-Quality of Recovery-10 score as the primary outcome, analyzed as a continuous variable. The non-inferiority margin was set at 8 points, defined as the maximum clinically acceptable difference to consider the intervention not inferior to the control. The estimation assumed a common standard deviation of 15.2 points, based on preliminary data, a one-sided significance level of 0.025, and 80% statistical power. Under the assumption of no true differences between groups, the calculated sample size was 58 patients per group. Accounting for a 10% rate of loss to follow-up or incomplete data, the final sample size was adjusted to 64 patients per group, for a total of 128 patients.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 18, 2026

First Posted

August 20, 2026

Study Start

August 21, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2027

Last Updated

August 20, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

No individual participant data will be shared. The raw data will not be publicly available due to participant privacy and ethical constraints.