Effect of Mechanical Power-based Lung-protective Ventilation During One-lung Ventilation
Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Between Mechanical Power-based Versus Conventional Lung Protective Ventilation During One-lung Ventilation: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
164
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether a mechanical power-based lung-protective ventilation strategy during one-lung ventilation reduces the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in adult patients undergoing lung resection surgery. Mechanical power during pressure-regulated volume control mode is calculated using the formula below. Mechanical power (J/min) = 0.098 x respiratory rate x tidal volume x (inspiratory airway pressure above positive end-expiratory pressure + positive end-expiratory pressure) The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does a mechanical power-based lung-protective ventilation strategy significantly lower the incidence of major postoperative pulmonary complications compared to conventional ventilation?
- How does this strategy impact intraoperative hemodynamic and vital profiles (e.g., blood pressure, cardiac output, vasopressor requirements, and blood oxygen saturation) during one-lung ventilation? Participants will:
- Be randomized to receive either a mechanical power-based lung-protective ventilation strategy or a conventional lung-protective ventilation strategy exclusively during one-lung ventilation.
- Be closely monitored for the occurrence of major postoperative pulmonary complications (atelectasis, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and pulmonary aspiration) and adverse events for 1 month postoperatively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 14, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 19, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 30, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 30, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2027
August 27, 2026
August 1, 2026
1 year
August 14, 2026
August 25, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative pulmonary complication
Composite of respiratory diagnoses that share common pathophysiological mechanisms, including pulmonary collapse and airway contamination: 1. atelectasis detected on computed tomography or chest radiograph, 2. pneumonia using United States Centers for Disease Control criteria, 3. acute respiratory distress syndrome using the Berlin consensus definition, and 4. pulmonary aspiration (clear clinical history AND radiological evidence).
From enrollment to 7 days postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Clavien-Dindo classification
From enrollment to 30 days postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Mechanical power-based lung protective ventilation group
EXPERIMENTALPatients in this group will receive the mechanical power-based lung-protective ventilation strategy during one-lung ventilation.
Conventional ventilation group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this group will receive the conventional lung-protective ventilation strategy during one-lung ventilation.
Interventions
Initial Settings 1\) Tidal Volume: 4-6 mL/kg of predicted body weight 2) Positive End-Expiratory Pressure: Set to the value that minimizes driving pressure 3) Respiratory Rate: Adjusted to maintain an end-tidal carbon dioxide of 35-45 mmHg Protocol 1. If mechanical power exceeds 7 J/min, decrease the respiratory rate by 1 and reduce the tidal volume by 5%, then maintain these settings for 1 minute. 2. If mechanical power remains above 7 J/min after 1 minute, further decrease the respiratory rate by 1 and reduce the tidal volume by an additional 5%, then maintain for 1 minute. 3. If end-tidal carbon dioxide exceeds 50 mmHg, perform arterial blood gas analysis to check arterial pH. 4. If arterial pH drops below 7.2, the intervention will be discontinued, and the patient will be withdrawn from the study and treated with conventional treatment.
Ventilator Settings * Tidal Volume: 4-6 mL/kg of predicted body weight * Positive End-Expiratory Pressure: 5 cmH2O * Respiratory Rate: Adjusted to maintain an end-tidal carbon dioxide of 35-45 mmHg
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
- Elective thoracic surgery requiring lung lobectomy under one-lung ventilation
- Age 18 years or older
- Written informed consent obtained from the patient
You may not qualify if:
- Prior history of thoracic surgery
- Emergency surgery
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Known contraindication to one-lung ventilation
- Inability to provide informed consent or cooperate with the study protocol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 06351, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Anesthesiologist, Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 14, 2026
First Posted
August 19, 2026
Study Start
August 30, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2027
Last Updated
August 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share