Grow With Grit: A School Nurse-Led SBIRT Pilot for Early Anxiety Detection
GwG
Grow With Grit: A Nurse-Led SBIRT Model for Early Anxiety Detection and School-Based Mental Health Intervention in Rural Youth
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
4
Brief Summary
All enrolled students and their parents or guardians will complete baseline anxiety questionnaires. Students with a positive baseline screen will receive a brief school nurse-delivered coping skill, referral support when indicated, and follow-up assessments at approximately three and six months. Students with a negative screen will not enter the intervention and follow-up phase.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable anxiety
Started Feb 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable anxiety
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 9, 2026
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 17, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
August 17, 2026
August 1, 2026
1.5 years
August 5, 2026
August 10, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Positive Baseline Anxiety Screen Among Students Meeting the Somatic-Frequency Case-Finding Rule
Percentage of enrolled students who met the somatic-frequency case-finding rule, completed both baseline anxiety questionnaires, and had a positive baseline anxiety screen. The somatic-frequency rule is defined as three or more school-nurse visits involving qualifying somatic complaints within the previous six weeks. A positive screen is defined as a total score of 25 or higher on either the 41-item SCARED-Child Version or the 41-item SCARED-Parent Version. The percentage is calculated as the number of students meeting the rule who had a positive baseline screen divided by the number of students meeting the rule who completed both baseline questionnaires, multiplied by 100.
At baseline screening
Completion of Child and Parent Anxiety Screening
Percentage of students with parent or guardian consent and child assent for whom both the 41-item SCARED-Child Version and the 41-item SCARED-Parent Version are completed at baseline. The percentage is calculated as the number of students who complete both baseline questionnaires divided by the total number of students with parent or guardian consent and child assent, multiplied by 100.
At baseline screening following enrollment
Proportion of Students Meeting the Somatic-Frequency Case-Finding Rule
Percentage of enrolled students who met the somatic-frequency case-finding rule when identified as potentially eligible. The rule is defined as three or more school-nurse visits involving qualifying somatic complaints within the previous six weeks. The percentage is calculated as the number of enrolled students who met the somatic-frequency rule divided by the total number of enrolled students, multiplied by 100. Students may meet the somatic-frequency rule, the absenteeism trigger, or both.
During the six weeks preceding identification as potentially eligible
Fidelity to the School Nurse-Delivered Micro-CBT Intervention
Percentage of documented school nurse-delivered micro-CBT encounters in which all required intervention components are documented as completed: brief explanation of the connection between body signals and stress or worry, guided practice of one card-based coping skill, and development or reinforcement of a brief plan for using the skill. The percentage is calculated as the number of encounters in which all required components are documented as completed divided by the total number of documented micro-CBT encounters, multiplied by 100. Missing documentation of a required component will be treated as that component not being documented as completed. Optional body-distress ratings, reflection, and the student's disposition following the encounter are not required for intervention fidelity.
At each documented micro-CBT interaction from baseline through the 6-month follow-up
Completion of Behavioral Health Referrals Among Students with a Positive Baseline Anxiety Screen
Percentage of students with a positive baseline anxiety screen for whom a school-based or community-based behavioral health referral is documented as completed. A positive screen is defined as a total score of 25 or higher on either the 41-item SCARED-Child Version or the 41-item SCARED-Parent Version. The percentage is calculated as the number of students with a positive baseline screen whose referral is documented as completed divided by the total number of students with a positive baseline screen, multiplied by 100. School nurses initiate an MTSS-aligned referral for students with a positive screen. Referral initiation, status, engagement, completion, and barriers are documented through the school's MTSS-aligned tracking process and study case-report form.
From the positive baseline anxiety screen through the 6-month follow-up
Completion of the School Nurse-Delivered Micro-CBT Intervention
Percentage of students with a positive baseline anxiety screen who receive the standardized 3- to 5-minute school nurse-delivered micro-CBT interaction. A positive screen is defined as a total score of 25 or higher on either the 41-item SCARED-Child Version or the 41-item SCARED-Parent Version. The percentage is calculated as the number of students with a positive baseline screen who receive the micro-CBT interaction divided by the total number of students with a positive baseline screen, multiplied by 100. Completion is documented in the Individual Student Tracker and micro-CBT encounter record.
From determination of a positive baseline anxiety screen until completion of the standardized micro-CBT intervention, assessed up to 6 months after baseline
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change From Baseline in Child-Reported SCARED Total Score
Baseline, approximately 3 months after baseline, and approximately 6 months after baseline
Change From Baseline in SCARED-Parent Version Total Score
Baseline, approximately 3 months after baseline, and approximately 6 months after baseline
Somatic-Related School Nurse Visits During Follow-Up
From baseline through 6 months after baseline
Change From Baseline in Percentage of Enrolled School Days Absent
The six-week periods preceding baseline, approximately 3 months after baseline, and approximately 6 months after baseline
Other Outcomes (4)
Change From Baseline in Child-Reported SCARED Panic Disorder or Significant Somatic Symptoms Subscale Score
Baseline, approximately 3 months after baseline, and approximately 6 months after baseline
Immediate Change in Student-Reported Body Distress Following Micro-CBT Skills Practice
Immediately before and after each micro-CBT skills-practice encounter, from baseline through the 6-month follow-up
Proportion of Enrolled Students Meeting the Absenteeism Case-Finding Trigger
During the 6 weeks preceding identification as potentially eligible
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Grow with Grit School Nurse-Led SBIRT
EXPERIMENTALParticipants complete child and parent anxiety screening. Students who screen positive receive a brief school nurse-led coping-skills intervention, referral through the school's existing mental health support pathway, and follow-up assessments at approximately three and six months. Students who screen negative do not continue into the intervention and follow-up phase.
Interventions
After targeted case-finding and enrollment, students and their parents or guardians complete the child and parent versions of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED). Students with a score of 25 or higher on either version receive a standardized three- to five-minute, school nurse-delivered micro-CBT intervention during the same or next clinically appropriate encounter. The nurse provides brief psychoeducation about connections among body signals, thoughts, feelings, and stress; practices a coping skill matched to the student's concern, such as paced breathing, grounding, gentle movement, or cognitive reframing; and develops a brief plan for using the skill and returning to class when appropriate. The nurse also initiates a referral through the school's existing MTSS-aligned mental health pathway. Coping skills may be reinforced during subsequent school nurse encounters. Students who screen negative do not receive the study micro-CBT intervention or enter the
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- GFPS students aged 8-12 years and enrolled at one of the following schools:
- Mountain View Elementary West Elementary Longfellow Elementary Sunnyside Elementary School
- Participants will be identified through a weekly review of school nurse electronic health records (Frontline EHR) and attendance logs, and will include students who have either:
- Absenteeism greater than or equal to 10% of total school days due to the previously defined somatic complaints, within the past 6 weeks.
- English-speaking without an interpreter (both student and guardian).
You may not qualify if:
- Currently receiving ongoing behavioral health services, including psychotherapy, psychiatric medication management, or active behavioral health case management.
- Brief, one-time crisis counseling is not considered ongoing services.
- Questions about eligibility should be directed to the Principal Investigator.
- Presence of a chronic medical diagnosis that fully accounts for the student's repeated somatic visits (e.g., asthma with frequent exacerbations, epilepsy, diabetes, sickle cell disease, or active cancer treatment).
- a. Students with partially explained symptoms who are also suspected to have co-occurring anxiety may be reviewed on a case-by-case basis by the PI/designee.
- Documented cognitive or communication impairments that preclude meaningful completion of the SCARED screening tool or informed assent.
- Examples include moderate to severe intellectual disability or severe receptive/expressive language disorder without feasible accommodations.
- Students with an IEP or 504 plan that includes communication supports may be included if they can complete the tool with reasonable accommodations.
- Students who are wards of the state or in foster care.
- Non-English speaking students or guardians.
- Acute safety concerns at the time of screening (e.g., active suicidal ideation with plan/intent, recent suicide attempt, or other crisis requiring immediate intervention).
- Such students will be triaged to crisis protocols and excluded from study participation at that time.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
West Elementary School
Great Falls, Montana, 59404, United States
Longfellow Elementary
Great Falls, Montana, 59405, United States
Mountain View Elementary School
Great Falls, Montana, 59405, United States
Sunnyside Elementary School
Great Falls, Montana, 59405, United States
Related Publications (2)
Ruth D, Hammersla M, Tanner A. Implementation of a School Nurse-Led Case-Finding and Targeted Anxiety Testing Protocol (SBIRT-Informed) in an Elementary School: A Quality Improvement Initiative. J Sch Nurs. 2026 Jun 15:10598405261455898. doi: 10.1177/10598405261455898. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 42295108BACKGROUNDBirmaher B, Brent DA, Chiappetta L, Bridge J, Monga S, Baugher M. Psychometric properties of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): a replication study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999 Oct;38(10):1230-6. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199910000-00011.
PMID: 10517055BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Donna Sanders R Principal Investigator, DNP-PMH, BSN
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2026
First Posted
August 17, 2026
Study Start
February 9, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
August 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share