NCT07763249

Brief Summary

This is a randomized, assessor-blinded, non-inferiority clinical trial comparing continuous thoracic paravertebral block (BPV) versus continuous thoracic epidural block (BPD) for postoperative pain control in adult patients undergoing elective open thoracotomy with one-lung ventilation. The primary outcome is the mean pain intensity at rest assessed by the Numeric Verbal Scale (NVS 0-10) during the first 48 hours after surgery. A total of 80 participants will be randomized 1:1 at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil. The study aims to determine whether BPV provides non-inferior analgesia compared to BPD, with a potential advantage of less hemodynamic interference and better postoperative mobilization.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable postoperative-pain

Timeline
23mo left

Started Sep 2026

Typical duration for not_applicable postoperative-pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 10, 2026

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 13, 2026

Completed
19 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2026

Expected
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 31, 2028

6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2028

Last Updated

August 13, 2026

Status Verified

August 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

August 10, 2026

Last Update Submit

August 10, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Postoperative PainThoracotomyAcute PainThoracic SurgeryRegional Anesthesia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Mean pain intensity at rest during the first 48 hours after surgery

    Mean of the pain scores at rest measured by the Numeric Verbal Scale (NVS 0-10) at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. This composite measure is the primary endpoint for the non-inferiority comparison between continuous thoracic paravertebral block and continuous thoracic epidural block.

    6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Pain on movement

    6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery

  • Total opioid consumption in the first 48 hours

    0 to 48 hours after surgery

  • Block-related complications

    During the first 48 hours after surgery

  • Clinically significant pulmonary and cardiovascular complications

    Up to 72 hours after surgery

  • Length of hospital stay

    From surgery until hospital discharge (assessed up to 30 days)

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Paravertebral Block Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants randomized to the continuous thoracic paravertebral block (BPV) group. At the end of surgery and before chest tube placement, a paravertebral catheter is inserted under direct thoracoscopic vision (without ultrasound) using a Tuohy needle. A bolus of ropivacaine 0.375% (15 mL, fractionated) is administered, followed by continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% at 0.10 mL/kg/h. The target level is T5-T7 (or T5-T9). The catheter remains in place for at least 48 hours postoperatively.

Procedure: Continuous Thoracic Paravertebral Block

Epidural Block Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants randomized to the continuous thoracic epidural block (BPD) group. At the beginning of surgery, an epidural catheter is inserted at the thoracic level using the loss-of-resistance technique. A bolus of ropivacaine 0.375% (15 mL, fractionated) is administered, followed by continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% at 0.10 mL/kg/h. The target level is T5-T7 (or T5-T9). The catheter remains in place for at least 48 hours postoperatively.

Procedure: Continuous Thoracic Epidural Block

Interventions

Participants randomized to the continuous thoracic paravertebral block (BPV) group. At the end of surgery and before chest tube placement, a paravertebral catheter is inserted under direct thoracoscopic vision (without ultrasound) using a Tuohy needle. A bolus of ropivacaine 0.375% (15 mL, fractionated) is administered, followed by continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% at 0.10 mL/kg/h. The target level is T5-T7 (or T5-T9). The catheter remains in place for at least 48 hours postoperatively.

Paravertebral Block Group

Participants randomized to the continuous thoracic epidural block (BPD) group. At the beginning of surgery, an epidural catheter is inserted at the thoracic level using the loss-of-resistance technique. A bolus of ropivacaine 0.375% (15 mL, fractionated) is administered, followed by continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% at 0.10 mL/kg/h. The target level is T5-T7 (or T5-T9). The catheter remains in place for at least 48 hours postoperatively.

Epidural Block Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged 18 years or older;
  • Elective thoracic surgeries requiring open thoracotomy;
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III.

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnancy or lactation;
  • Urgent or emergency surgeries;
  • Contraindications to epidural catheter insertion or neuraxial anesthesia;
  • Infection at the proposed block site;
  • Patient refusal to undergo the study blocks;
  • Video-assisted thoracic surgeries;
  • Anticipated need for invasive mechanical ventilation in the postoperative period;
  • Chronic opioid use (daily use for more than 3 months of ≥10 mg oral morphine equivalent);
  • Severe vertebral deformities or previous thoracic spine surgery that prevent safe performance of the blocks;
  • Known allergy to local anesthetics, opioids, or study medications;
  • Body mass index \> 35 kg/m²;
  • Advanced liver or kidney failure (Child-Pugh C or estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 50 mL/min/1.73 m²);
  • Severe cognitive impairment that prevents understanding of instructions or pain assessment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA)

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul (RS), 90410-000, Brazil

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Perumal-Pillay VA, Suleman F. Selection of essential medicines for South Africa - an analysis of in-depth interviews with national essential medicines list committee members. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 7;17(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1946-9.

    PMID: 28061899BACKGROUND
  • Talmor D, Merkind V, Artru AA, Shapiro O, Geva D, Roytblat L, Shapira Y. Treatments to support blood pressure increases bleeding and/or decreases survival in a rat model of closed head trauma combined with uncontrolled hemorrhage. Anesth Analg. 1999 Oct;89(4):950-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199910000-00024.

    PMID: 10512270BACKGROUND
  • Gupta T, Gupta SK, Sahni D. Anatomy of the tentorial segment of the trochlear nerve in reference to its preservation during surgery for skull base lesions. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014 Dec;36(10):967-71. doi: 10.1007/s00276-014-1278-6. Epub 2014 Mar 13.

    PMID: 24623122BACKGROUND
  • Weitzel NS. Anesthesia and airway surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Dec;16(4):181. doi: 10.1177/1089253212465019. No abstract available.

    PMID: 23235989BACKGROUND
  • Bard RL, Gillespie BW, Patel H, Nicklas JM. Prognostic ability of resting periodic breathing and ventilatory variation in closely matched patients with heart failure. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2008 Sep-Oct;28(5):318-22. doi: 10.1097/01.HCR.0000336143.02064.0e.

    PMID: 18784542BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, PostoperativeAcute Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Cristiano F Andrade, MD, PhD

    Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Cristiano F Andrade, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Andre P. Schmidt, MD, MSc, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The study is single-blind (outcomes assessor blinded). Due to the nature of the interventions, patients and the clinicians performing or managing the blocks (thoracic surgeons and anesthesiologists) are not blinded. Outcome assessors who evaluate pain scores, opioid consumption, and complications remain blinded to participant allocation. Randomization is centralized with sealed numbered envelopes to ensure allocation concealment.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This is a two-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Participants are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the continuous thoracic paravertebral block group (BPV) or the continuous thoracic epidural block group (BPD). Both groups receive catheter-based regional analgesia using the same initial bolus (ropivacaine 0.375%, 15 mL) and continuous infusion (bupivacaine 0.125% at 0.10 mL/kg/h). The parallel design allows direct head-to-head comparison of the two techniques for non-inferiority in postoperative pain control during the first 48 hours, with blinded outcome assessment.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2026

First Posted

August 13, 2026

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2028

Last Updated

August 13, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will not be shared with other researchers. Only aggregated and de-identified results will be published. All data will be stored securely and confidentially in accordance with institutional policies and Brazilian data protection laws (LGPD).

Locations