Comparison of Paravertebral Versus Epidural Block for Post-thoracotomy Pain Control
Comparison Between Paravertebral Block and Epidural Block for the Management of Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Thoracotomy and One-Lung Ventilation: A Prospective Non-inferiority Study.
2 other identifiers
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a randomized, assessor-blinded, non-inferiority clinical trial comparing continuous thoracic paravertebral block (BPV) versus continuous thoracic epidural block (BPD) for postoperative pain control in adult patients undergoing elective open thoracotomy with one-lung ventilation. The primary outcome is the mean pain intensity at rest assessed by the Numeric Verbal Scale (NVS 0-10) during the first 48 hours after surgery. A total of 80 participants will be randomized 1:1 at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil. The study aims to determine whether BPV provides non-inferior analgesia compared to BPD, with a potential advantage of less hemodynamic interference and better postoperative mobilization.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
Started Sep 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable postoperative-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 10, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 13, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2028
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2028
August 13, 2026
August 1, 2026
1.4 years
August 10, 2026
August 10, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean pain intensity at rest during the first 48 hours after surgery
Mean of the pain scores at rest measured by the Numeric Verbal Scale (NVS 0-10) at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. This composite measure is the primary endpoint for the non-inferiority comparison between continuous thoracic paravertebral block and continuous thoracic epidural block.
6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Pain on movement
6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery
Total opioid consumption in the first 48 hours
0 to 48 hours after surgery
Block-related complications
During the first 48 hours after surgery
Clinically significant pulmonary and cardiovascular complications
Up to 72 hours after surgery
Length of hospital stay
From surgery until hospital discharge (assessed up to 30 days)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Paravertebral Block Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants randomized to the continuous thoracic paravertebral block (BPV) group. At the end of surgery and before chest tube placement, a paravertebral catheter is inserted under direct thoracoscopic vision (without ultrasound) using a Tuohy needle. A bolus of ropivacaine 0.375% (15 mL, fractionated) is administered, followed by continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% at 0.10 mL/kg/h. The target level is T5-T7 (or T5-T9). The catheter remains in place for at least 48 hours postoperatively.
Epidural Block Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants randomized to the continuous thoracic epidural block (BPD) group. At the beginning of surgery, an epidural catheter is inserted at the thoracic level using the loss-of-resistance technique. A bolus of ropivacaine 0.375% (15 mL, fractionated) is administered, followed by continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% at 0.10 mL/kg/h. The target level is T5-T7 (or T5-T9). The catheter remains in place for at least 48 hours postoperatively.
Interventions
Participants randomized to the continuous thoracic paravertebral block (BPV) group. At the end of surgery and before chest tube placement, a paravertebral catheter is inserted under direct thoracoscopic vision (without ultrasound) using a Tuohy needle. A bolus of ropivacaine 0.375% (15 mL, fractionated) is administered, followed by continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% at 0.10 mL/kg/h. The target level is T5-T7 (or T5-T9). The catheter remains in place for at least 48 hours postoperatively.
Participants randomized to the continuous thoracic epidural block (BPD) group. At the beginning of surgery, an epidural catheter is inserted at the thoracic level using the loss-of-resistance technique. A bolus of ropivacaine 0.375% (15 mL, fractionated) is administered, followed by continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% at 0.10 mL/kg/h. The target level is T5-T7 (or T5-T9). The catheter remains in place for at least 48 hours postoperatively.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 18 years or older;
- Elective thoracic surgeries requiring open thoracotomy;
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy or lactation;
- Urgent or emergency surgeries;
- Contraindications to epidural catheter insertion or neuraxial anesthesia;
- Infection at the proposed block site;
- Patient refusal to undergo the study blocks;
- Video-assisted thoracic surgeries;
- Anticipated need for invasive mechanical ventilation in the postoperative period;
- Chronic opioid use (daily use for more than 3 months of ≥10 mg oral morphine equivalent);
- Severe vertebral deformities or previous thoracic spine surgery that prevent safe performance of the blocks;
- Known allergy to local anesthetics, opioids, or study medications;
- Body mass index \> 35 kg/m²;
- Advanced liver or kidney failure (Child-Pugh C or estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 50 mL/min/1.73 m²);
- Severe cognitive impairment that prevents understanding of instructions or pain assessment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA)
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul (RS), 90410-000, Brazil
Related Publications (5)
Perumal-Pillay VA, Suleman F. Selection of essential medicines for South Africa - an analysis of in-depth interviews with national essential medicines list committee members. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 7;17(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1946-9.
PMID: 28061899BACKGROUNDTalmor D, Merkind V, Artru AA, Shapiro O, Geva D, Roytblat L, Shapira Y. Treatments to support blood pressure increases bleeding and/or decreases survival in a rat model of closed head trauma combined with uncontrolled hemorrhage. Anesth Analg. 1999 Oct;89(4):950-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199910000-00024.
PMID: 10512270BACKGROUNDGupta T, Gupta SK, Sahni D. Anatomy of the tentorial segment of the trochlear nerve in reference to its preservation during surgery for skull base lesions. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014 Dec;36(10):967-71. doi: 10.1007/s00276-014-1278-6. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
PMID: 24623122BACKGROUNDWeitzel NS. Anesthesia and airway surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Dec;16(4):181. doi: 10.1177/1089253212465019. No abstract available.
PMID: 23235989BACKGROUNDBard RL, Gillespie BW, Patel H, Nicklas JM. Prognostic ability of resting periodic breathing and ventilatory variation in closely matched patients with heart failure. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2008 Sep-Oct;28(5):318-22. doi: 10.1097/01.HCR.0000336143.02064.0e.
PMID: 18784542BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cristiano F Andrade, MD, PhD
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The study is single-blind (outcomes assessor blinded). Due to the nature of the interventions, patients and the clinicians performing or managing the blocks (thoracic surgeons and anesthesiologists) are not blinded. Outcome assessors who evaluate pain scores, opioid consumption, and complications remain blinded to participant allocation. Randomization is centralized with sealed numbered envelopes to ensure allocation concealment.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 10, 2026
First Posted
August 13, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 31, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2028
Last Updated
August 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data will not be shared with other researchers. Only aggregated and de-identified results will be published. All data will be stored securely and confidentially in accordance with institutional policies and Brazilian data protection laws (LGPD).