Oral Flap Outline and Local Blood Supply After Surgical Removal of Lower Third Molar Teeth
Influence of Two Mucoperiosteal Flap Outlines on Neighbouring-Tooth and Mucosal Microcirculation Following Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Wisdom Teeth: A Laser Doppler Flowmetry Investigation
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Wisdom teeth in the lower jaw are frequently buried in bone and must be taken out surgically. To reach the tooth, the surgeon lifts the gum away from the bone as a flap, and the shape of that flap is left to the surgeon's judgement. Two outlines are in everyday use. The first runs only along the necks of the teeth, so the gum is lifted without any additional cut. The second adds a short downward cut in front, which opens the field more widely but also divides some of the small vessels that run within the gum. Because the tissues around a wound rely on a rich network of tiny vessels while they repair themselves, it is worth knowing whether these two outlines leave the local circulation in a different state. This project measured that circulation directly. A laser probe was placed against the tooth in front of the extraction site and against three points on the cheek-side gum, and the amount of moving blood beneath the probe was recorded. To make sure the probe returned to exactly the same spots at every visit, a thin clear plastic guide with prepared openings was made for each participant from a plaster model of the mouth. Measurements were taken before the operation and again on the third and the seventh day afterwards. Facial swelling and how widely the mouth could be opened were recorded on the same occasions. Participants were assigned to one of the two flap outlines in turn, and every operation was carried out by the same surgeon so that the comparison depended on the flap outline alone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 9, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 9, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 9, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 11, 2026
CompletedAugust 11, 2026
August 1, 2026
1 year
August 5, 2026
August 5, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in mucosal microcirculation adjacent to the operative field
Perfusion in perfusion units (PU) at three buccal mucosal sites recorded by laser Doppler flowmetry through the same stabilising stent, 30 seconds per site. The most anterior site lies in the region traversed by the vertical relieving cut of the three-cornered outline.
Immediately before surgery, and on postoperative days 3 and 7
Change in pulp microcirculation of the tooth adjacent to the extraction site
Perfusion recorded in perfusion units (PU) by laser Doppler flowmetry over the mid-buccal aspect of the neighbouring second molar, with probe position reproduced by an individually made acrylic stent. Each recording lasts 30 seconds. A higher value indicates greater circulation.
Immediately before surgery, and on postoperative days 3 and 7
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in facial swelling
Immediately before surgery, and on postoperative days 3 and 7
Change in maximum mouth opening
Immediately before surgery, and on postoperative days 3 and 7
Duration of the operation
Day of surgery (day 0), intraoperative
Study Arms (2)
Sulcular (envelope) flap
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe mucoperiosteum is raised through an incision confined to the gingival sulcus, carried from the mesial aspect of the first molar back to the distal aspect of the second molar and then along the external oblique ridge. No vertical cut is made.
Three-cornered (trapezoidal) flap
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe same sulcular and posterior incision is used, with the addition of a vertical relieving cut placed anterior to the second molar and kept clear of the interdental papilla.
Interventions
The mucoperiosteum is raised through an incision confined to the gingival sulcus, carried from the mesial aspect of the first molar back to the distal aspect of the second molar and then along the external oblique ridge.
The same sulcular and posterior incision is used, with the addition of a vertical relieving cut placed anterior to the second molar and kept clear of the interdental papilla
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Free of systemic illness and taking no regular medication
- Aged 18 to 40 years
- One fully bone-impacted mandibular wisdom tooth for which surgical removal is indicated
- Ramus relationship of class II or III and depth position A, B or C on the Pell and Gregory scheme
- Angulation falling into one of four categories on Winter's scheme: vertical, mesioangular, horizontal or distoangular
- Neighbouring second molar intact, i.e. without extensive caries, endodontic treatment, a large filling or a crown
- Willing and able to give written consent and to attend both follow-up visits
You may not qualify if:
- Any systemic disorder, or use of medication on a continuing basis
- Tobacco use
- Previous irradiation or chemotherapy involving the head and neck
- Infection within the mouth at the time of surgery, including acute pericoronitis
- Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy
- Menstruation at the time of a scheduled measurement
- Need for more than two anaesthetic cartridges to achieve profound anaesthesia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Gaziantep University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Gaziantep, Gaziantep, 27310, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
Kirk DG, Liston PN, Tong DC, Love RM. Influence of two different flap designs on incidence of pain, swelling, trismus, and alveolar osteitis in the week following third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Jul;104(1):e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.01.032. Epub 2007 May 15.
PMID: 17507264BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Betül Taş Özyurtseven, DDS, PhD, Assoc. Prof. Dr.
University of Gaziantep
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Senior Researcher / Clinician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2026
First Posted
August 11, 2026
Study Start
November 9, 2020
Primary Completion
November 9, 2021
Study Completion
November 9, 2021
Last Updated
August 11, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
available from the corresponding author on reasonable request